Literature DB >> 32686118

Synthesis of diagnostic quality cancer pathology images by generative adversarial networks.

Adrian B Levine1, Jason Peng1,2, David Farnell1, Mitchell Nursey1,2, Yiping Wang1,2, Julia R Naso1, Hezhen Ren1, Hossein Farahani1,2, Colin Chen1,2, Derek Chiu1, Aline Talhouk3, Brandon Sheffield4, Maziar Riazy1, Philip P Ip5, Carlos Parra-Herran6, Anne Mills7, Naveena Singh8, Basile Tessier-Cloutier1, Taylor Salisbury1, Jonathan Lee1, Tim Salcudean9, Steven Jm Jones10, David G Huntsman1, C Blake Gilks1, Stephen Yip1, Ali Bashashati1,2,9.   

Abstract

Deep learning-based computer vision methods have recently made remarkable breakthroughs in the analysis and classification of cancer pathology images. However, there has been relatively little investigation of the utility of deep neural networks to synthesize medical images. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of generative adversarial networks to synthesize high-resolution pathology images of 10 histological types of cancer, including five cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas and the five major histological subtypes of ovarian carcinoma. The quality of these images was assessed using a comprehensive survey of board-certified pathologists (n = 9) and pathology trainees (n = 6). Our results show that the real and synthetic images are classified by histotype with comparable accuracies and the synthetic images are visually indistinguishable from real images. Furthermore, we trained deep convolutional neural networks to diagnose the different cancer types and determined that the synthetic images perform as well as additional real images when used to supplement a small training set. These findings have important applications in proficiency testing of medical practitioners and quality assurance in clinical laboratories. Furthermore, training of computer-aided diagnostic systems can benefit from synthetic images where labeled datasets are limited (e.g. rare cancers). We have created a publicly available website where clinicians and researchers can attempt questions from the image survey (http://gan.aimlab.ca/).
© 2020 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. © 2020 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial intelligence; cancer; deep learning; education; pathology; quality assurance

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32686118     DOI: 10.1002/path.5509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  5 in total

1.  Artificial intelligence for automating the measurement of histologic image biomarkers.

Authors:  Toby C Cornish
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 2.  Artificial Intelligence in Pathology: From Prototype to Product.

Authors:  André Homeyer; Johannes Lotz; Lars Ole Schwen; Nick Weiss; Daniel Romberg; Henning Höfener; Norman Zerbe; Peter Hufnagl
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2021-03-22

3.  Automated Detection of Portal Fields and Central Veins in Whole-Slide Images of Liver Tissue.

Authors:  Daniel Budelmann; Hendrik Laue; Nick Weiss; Uta Dahmen; Lorenza A D'Alessandro; Ina Biermayer; Ursula Klingmüller; Ahmed Ghallab; Reham Hassan; Brigitte Begher-Tibbe; Jan G Hengstler; Lars Ole Schwen
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2022-01-20

Review 4.  Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Microsatellite Instability Based on Tumor Histomorphology: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Park; Eun Young Kim; Claudio Luchini; Albino Eccher; Kalthoum Tizaoui; Jae Il Shin; Beom Jin Lim
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Medical domain knowledge in domain-agnostic generative AI.

Authors:  Jakob Nikolas Kather; Narmin Ghaffari Laleh; Sebastian Foersch; Daniel Truhn
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2022-07-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.