Shashi Malladi1, David Miranda-Nieves2,3,4, Lian Leng1, Stephanie J Grainger3, Constantine Tarabanis3, Alexander P Nesmith4, Revanth Kosaraju3, Carolyn A Haller3, Kevin Kit Parker4, Elliot L Chaikof2,3,4, Axel Günther1,5. 1. Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S3G8, Canada. 2. Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States. 3. Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States. 4. Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering of Harvard University, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, United States. 5. Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G9, Canada.
Abstract
The multiscale organization of protein-based fibrillar materials is a hallmark of many organs, but the recapitulation of hierarchal structures down to fibrillar scales, which is a requirement for withstanding physiological loading forces, has been challenging. We present a microfluidic strategy for the continuous, large-scale formation of strong, handleable, free-standing, multicentimeter-wide collagen sheets of unprecedented thinness through the application of hydrodynamic focusing with the simultaneous imposition of strain. Sheets as thin as 1.9 μm displayed tensile strengths of 0.5-2.7 MPa, Young's moduli of 3-36 MPa, and modulated the diffusion of molecules as a function of collagen nanoscale structure. Smooth muscle cells cultured on engineered sheets oriented in the direction of aligned collagen fibrils and generated coordinated vasomotor responses. The described biofabrication approach enables rapid formation of ultrathin collagen sheets that withstand physiologically relevant loads for applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, as well as in organ-on-chip and biohybrid devices.
The multiscale organization of protein-based fibrillar materials is a hallmark of many organs, but the recapitulation of hierarchal structures down to fibrillar scales, which is a requirement for withstanding physiological loading forces, has been challenging. We present a microfluidic strategy for the continuous, large-scale formation of strong, handleable, free-standing, multicentimeter-wide collagen sheets of unprecedented thinness through the application of hydrodynamic focusing with the simultaneous imposition of strain. Sheets as thin as 1.9 μm displayed tensile strengths of 0.5-2.7 MPa, Young's moduli of 3-36 MPa, and modulated the diffusion of molecules as a function of collagen nanoscale structure. Smooth muscle cells cultured on engineered sheets oriented in the direction of aligned collagen fibrils and generated coordinated vasomotor responses. The described biofabrication approach enables rapid formation of ultrathin collagen sheets that withstand physiologically relevant loads for applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, as well as in organ-on-chip and biohybrid devices.
The hierarchical organization of protein-based fibrillar materials
is tissue specific and plays an important role in organ function.
Collagen, the most abundant extracellular matrix (ECM) protein, accounts
for up to 30% of the total protein mass in mammals, and its hierarchical
organization in tissues is well studied.[1−3] Fibril-forming collagens
are composed of right-handed triple helices that self-assemble through
an entropy-driven process, known as fibrillogenesis, into fibrils,
and, subsequently, combine to form collagen fibrils with diameters
that range from 10 to 300 nm and a D-periodic banding pattern with
a characteristic length scale of 54–67 nm.[2] The higher order organization of collagen fibrils varies
between tissues and is closely linked to functional tissue characteristics.
For example, in tendons, collagen fibrils, with a diameter distribution
of 60 to 175 nm, are grouped into hierarchically organized and highly
compacted fiber bundles that allow for the transmission of forces
between bone and muscle tissue.[4,5] In the corneal stroma,
unidirectionally aligned narrow fibrils with diameters of 31–34
nm stack to form 2-μm thin, transparent lamellae,[6,7] and within the wall of blood vessels, collagen fibrils with diameters
of 30–100 nm are arranged into circumferentially aligned fibers
with characteristic pitch angles of 18.8–58.9° for human
aorta[2] that result in increased ultimate
tensile strength of the vascular wall and tolerance to physiological
blood pressures.[8,9] See Table S1 for a summary of the mechanical and nanostructural properties
of selected native tissues.Efforts aimed at recapitulating
tissue-specific multiscale organization
of collagen remain limited. While 3D printing strategies have attempted
to mimic collagen distribution at length scales between tens of microns
and several centimeters,[10−12] to date, these approaches lack
local control over fibril alignment and fibril packing density. As
a result, these synthetic constructs are, in many cases, mechanically
inferior to native tissues and often yield thick and loose structures.[13,14] Furthermore, strategies directed at inducing collagen fibril alignment
have been largely limited to either shear-induced orientation of collagen
within microfibers through wet spinning[15−19] or other approaches,[20,21] or induced
alignment within substrate-supported thin films by shear stress[22] or application of magnetic fields.[23] Free-standing collagen sheets have been produced
by casting,[24,25] electrophoretic deposition,[26] or plastic compression;[27,28] affording films of disordered fibril structure, typically tens to
hundreds of microns in thickness. The approach reported herein is
the first strategy that affords the continuous formation of ultrathin,
floating, highly aligned, dense collagen sheets at relevant length-scales
and macroscale properties, which permit these sheets to be easily
handled and manipulated.
Materials
and Methods
Isolation and Purification of Monomeric Collagen
Acid-soluble, monomeric rat-tail tendon collagen (MRTC) was obtained
from Sprague–Dawley rat tails following Silver and Trelstad.[29] Frozen rat tails (Pel-Freez Biologicals, Rogers,
AK) were thawed at room temperature and tendon was extracted with
a wire stripper, immersed in HCl (10 mM, pH 2; 150 mL per tail) and
stirred for 4 h at room temperature. Soluble collagen was separated
by centrifugation at 30,000g and 4 °C for 30
min followed by sequential filtration through 20, 0.45, and 0.2 μm
membranes. Addition of concentrated NaCl in HCl (pH 2) to a net salt
concentration of 0.7 M, followed by 1 h stirring and 1 h centrifugation
at 30,000g and 4 °C, precipitated the collagen.
After overnight redissolution in HCl (10 mM) the material was dialyzed
against phosphate buffer (20 mM) for at least 4 h at room temperature.
Subsequent dialysis was performed against phosphate buffer (20 mM)
at 4 °C for at least 8 h, and against HCl (10 mM) at 4 °C
overnight. The resulting MRTC solution was frozen and lyophilized.
Preparation of Collagen Solution, Flow Focusing
Buffer (FFB), and Fibrillogenesis Promoting Buffer (FPB)
A collagen solution (5 mg/mL) was prepared by dissolving the lyophilized
Type I monomeric collagen in deionized water (pH 2) containing blue
food dye (Club House, Canada) for visualization. The solution was
stirred continuously at 4 °C for 24 h to obtain an acidic collagen
solution. The rapid gelation of collagen solution was induced by the
addition of the buffering salts and polyethylene glycol (PEG), a molecular
crowding and gelation triggering agent, to deionized water. The flow
focusing buffer (FFB) comprised a neutralization buffer, which contained
PEG (10 wt %, MW 35 kDa, Sigma-Aldrich), monobasic sodium phosphate
(4.14 mg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich), dibasic sodium phosphate (12.1 mg/mL,
Sigma-Aldrich), TES (6.86 mg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich), and sodium chloride
(7.89 mg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich). The pH of the solution was adjusted to
8.[15] Following formation, collagen sheets
were incubated in phosphate buffer to induce fibrillogenesis. The
fibrillogenesis promoting buffer (FPB) was prepared in deionized water
and consisted of sodium chloride (7.89 mg/mL), dibasic sodium phosphate
(4.26 mg/mL), and Tris (10 mM), and the pH was adjusted to 7.4.[17]
Microfluidic Device Fabrication
The
microfluidic devices were fabricated using multilayer soft lithography
similar to a previously described process.[30] Briefly, two bifurcated microchannel networks were designed using
computer-aided design software (AutoCAD, Autodesk, Mill Valley, CA,
U.S.A.) for the distribution of the acidic collagen solution (red
color, Figure S1) and the FFB solution
(green color, Figure S1). The two corresponding
hard masks were prepared using a desktop mask writer (Heidelberg uPG
501, Heidelberg Instruments, Heidelberg, Germany). The negative resist
SU8–2050 (MicroChem, Newton, MA, U.S.A.) was spin coated in
two subsequent steps onto a single-sided polished silicon wafer (3″,
Wafer World, West Palm Beach, FL, U.S.A.). Briefly, a 75 μm-thick
layer of resist was spin coated and prebaked for 6 min at 65 °C
and for 15 min at 95 °C. Another 75 μm-thick layer was
spun, baked 10 min at 65 °C, and for 35 min at 95 °C. Microchannel
features were patterned by exposing the photomasks using a mask aligner
(OAI model 30, UV power: 18.8 mW/cm2) for 13.3 s. The exposed
substrate was post baked for 1 min at 65 °C and for 20 min at
95 °C and then developed in SU8 developer (MicroChem) for 12
min. The three feature layers were first molded individually in polydimethylsiloxane
(PDMS; Sylgard 184, Dow Corning, Midland, MI, USA) from the respective
masters to define bifurcated microchannel networks with a uniform
depth of 150 μm, and then vertically bonded on top of each other.
The top and the bottom layers were identical, and served to distribute
the buffer solution. The middle layer served to distribute the acidic
collagen solution. The top layer was molded to be 3 mm thick and completely
cured in an oven at 80 °C for 20 min. For the preparation of
the middle layer, PDMS was spun to a thickness of 500 μm, partially
cured, bonded to the top layer, and then completely cured.[31] The inlet hole to the second layer was defined
using a 1.5 mm diameter biopsy punch (World Precision Instruments,
Sarasota, FL, U.S.A.). The same process was repeated for the third
layer. A through hole of 1.5 mm diameter was then punched through
the first and third layers together. The three-layered device assembly
was then sealed using blank thick layer (3 mm) using handheld Corona
Treater (model BD-20, Electro-Technic Products, Chicago, IL, U.S.A.).
The multilayered device was cured at 80 °C overnight, and PEEK
tubing (1/16″ O.D. and 0.04″ I.D., Idex, Oak Harbor,
WA, U.S.A.) was connected to the inlets using epoxy glue (Lepage Speed
Set epoxy; Henkel Canada, Mississauga, ON, Canada). The device was
cut at the outlet at a distance of 1 mm from the channel exit to expose
the channels.
Aligned Collagen Sheet
Formation
The formation of collagen sheets consisted of the
co-extrusion of
an acidic type I collagen and FFB solutions through a microfluidic
device. First, the extrusion reservoir was filled with FFB such that
the volume reached the center of the mandrel cross-sectional area.
Then, rat tail type I collagen, pre-dissolved in deionized water (pH
2) at a concentration of 5 mg/mL, and FFB were injected into a three-layered
microfluidic device (described above) at a flow rate of 400 μL/min
and 4000 μL/min, respectively, using Tygon PVC clear tubing
(1/16″ ID, 1/8″ OD, McMaster Carr, CA, U.S.A.), disposable
plastic syringes, and two infusion pumps (model PHD 2000, Harvard
Apparatus, Holliston, MA, U.S.A.). At the device outlet, the emerging
collagen sheet was first manually guided through the bottom half of
the constriction bracket and placed over the computer-controlled mandrel,
followed by closure of the constriction bracket and initiation of
mandrel rotation. Tweezers were used to maintain a floating sheet
by preventing wrapping around the mandrel and tangling. Once the desired
sheet length was achieved the rotating mandrel was stopped, and the
sheet was manually cut from the segment extruded during startup. The
resulting ultrathin collagen sheet was incubated in the FFB-filled
reservoir for 30 min after extrusion, at which point it was washed
3× with deionized water and transferred to fibrillogenesis promoting
buffer (FPB) for a 48 h incubation at 37 °C. Approximately, 500
μL was required to prime the system, that is, to generate a
collagen sheet and position it over the mandrel. Once set up, 1 mL
of acidic collagen solution resulted in a 70 cm long sheet.Quantification of extruded sheet properties was conducted as a function
of the dimensionless velocitywhereis the total bulk velocity of the solutions
passing through the flow constriction, V is the velocity of the rotating mandrel, Q is the total flow rate of the FFB solution,
4000 μL/min, Q is the flow rate
of the collagen solution, 400 μL/min, W = 35 mm is the width of the exit section
of the microfluidic device, and H = 1 mm is the height of the geometric constriction.
Sheet Thickness and Width Measurement
Collagen sheets
were incubated for 1 h at room temperature in fluorescein
isothiocyanate-dextran solution and washed thrice with deionized water.
Samples were spread on coverslips (No. 1, thickness = 0.13 mm, width
and length = 22 mm, Fisherfinest Premium superslip) and imaged using
either a Zeiss 710 or Nikon A1 inverted confocal laser scanning microscope
with a 40× oil immersion objective (NA = 1.30, depth of field
= 0.25 μm, and field of view = 250 μm × 250 μm)
in the FITC channel (excitation: 490 nm, emission: 520 nm). Sheet
thickness was determined by obtaining Z-stack image slices with a
step size of 0.1 μm with analysis using a custom ImageJ macro.
The selection of confocal pinhole and z-step size was determined based
on values optimal for the objective selected. The collagen sheet thickness
was calculated by averaging the thickness at every z-point across
the stack, which was calculated by subtracting the threshold value
from the maximum intensity. Confocal images with x–y tiling and 10% overlap were analyzed in
ImageJ to determine sheet width.
FTIR
Measurement
To confirm the absence
of residual polyethylene glycol (PEG) within the collagen sheet or
any chemical cross-linking induced by FFB, the sheets were characterized
using a Fourier-transform Infrared (FTIR) spectrometer (model Vertex
70, Bruker Corp., Billerica, MA, U.S.A.). The sheets were pulverized
and placed on the surface of a diamond ATR crystal (MIRacle, Pike
Technologies, Madison, WI, U.S.A.) to obtain the end group peaks as
a function of the wavenumber. The spectra of FFB and collagen solution
were determined as baselines.
Strain
Conditioning of Collagen Sheets
After extrusion, collagen
sheets were incubated in FFB for 30 min
and subsequently strain conditioned on a custom-made setup (Figure S4). The setup included two clamps, one
fixed and a moveable clamp with a slider on opposing ends to secure
the sheet firmly. The moveable clamp allowed the application of the
desired strain rates. The setup also consisted of a reservoir that
allowed collagen sheets to remain hydrated and submerged in fibrillogenesis
promoting buffer (FPB) during the incubation period (48 h). Sheets
were supported on an elastic polymer strip (Mold Star 30, Smooth-On,
Macungie, PA, U.S.A.) that was molded within an acrylic frame and
was 150 mm long, 20 mm wide, and 1.5 mm thick. Plasma treatment of
the molded elastomeric support substrate for 90 s rendered the surface
hydrophilic and allowed collagen sheets to readily spread. Mounting
the sheet on the strain conditioning setup took around 10 min. After
strain conditioning for 48 h at 37 °C, the collagen sheets were
washed with deionized water, dried, and rehydrated prior to tensile
testing.
Mechanical Testing
The axial and
transverse tensile properties of rehydrated collagen sheets were measured
using a Dynamic Mechanical Thermal Analyzer V (DMTA V, Rheometric
Scientific, Piscataway, NJ, U.S.A.), with a 15 N load cell in the
inverted orientation to facilitate hydrated measurements.[18] Briefly, collagen sheets were cut into rectangular
pieces (10 mm × 20 mm) in the x and y directions, and immersed in PBS at 37 °C for 15 min.
Before testing, samples were preconditioned by 15 cycles up to 66%
of the average maximum failure strain. Testing consisted of straining
at 4 mm/min until fracture. The elastic modulus, ultimate tensile
strength, and strain-to-failure were determined from the stress–strain
curve and the sheet dimensions (i.e., length, width, and thickness).
Results were validated using a custom instrument as described by Tremblay
et al.[32] Briefly, as described by Hakimi
et al.,[33] samples were attached to custom
C-shaped clamps, mounted on manual translation stages (MT1B, Thorlabs,
Newton, U.S.A.), and pulled at speed of 0.01 mm/s by a linear voice
coil motor (LVCM-051-05-01, MotiCont, Van Nuys, CA, U.S.A.). A motion
controller (DMC-4143, Galil, Rocklin, CA, U.S.A.) operated by a custom
LabVIEW software program (National Instruments, Austin, U.S.A.) controlled
the displacement of the voice coil motors. A load cell (model 31 Low,
Honeywell, Charlotte, USA) was used to measure the force experienced
at a given displacement, which was transferred to the motion controller
using a DAQ card (USB-1208LS, Measurement Computing, Contoocook, NH,
U.S.A.) and an amplifier (model UV-10, Honeywell, Columbus, OH, U.S.A.).
Transmission Electron Microscopy
Dry collagen
sheets were washed thrice in cacodylate buffer (0.1
M) at pH 7.4 and fixed in glutaraldehyde (2.5%) and paraformaldehyde
(2%) in cacodylate buffer (0.1 M) at pH 7.4 for 90 min. The samples
were then washed again three times in cacodylate buffer (0.1 M) at
pH 7.4 and with deionized water. Samples were then fixed with osmium
tetraoxide (1%) in cacodylate buffer (0.1 M) at pH 7.4 for 1 h. En bloc staining was done using uranyl acetate (2%) in deionized
water for 1 h. Samples were again washed in deionized water, dehydrated
in a series of ethanol solutions (25–100%), and then embedded
in Quetol/Spurr resin at 30% overnight, 67% for 8 h, 100% overnight,
and polymerized in an oven at 60 °C for 48 h. Post-staining was
done with uranyl acetate (5%) for 15 min, followed by Reynolds lead
citrate for 15 min. Throughout the aforementioned processing steps,
the sheet was sandwiched between two rectangular, centrally slotted
PEEK pieces to ensure that a well-defined sheet orientation (flat,
without wrinkles or folds) was maintained. The resin-embedded sheet
within the central slot was cut out with a scalpel and 60–80
nm thin sections were cut with a microtome (model Leica Ultracut RMC
MT-6000, Leica Mikrosysteme, Vienna, Austria). Sectioned samples were
imaged using a transmission electron microscope (voltage 120 kV, TEM
model Tecnai 20, FEI, Hilsboro, OR, U.S.A.).
Fibril
Diameter, Density, Spacing, and Angular
Alignment Quantification
Individual fibril diameters were
obtained from TEM images for different V* values
using Nikon’s NIS Elements Advanced Research (AR) Software
(Version 4.13, Nikon Instruments, Melville, NY, U.S.A.). Each data
point represents an average value of five images and at least 15 fibrils
per image. Collagen fibril density was calculated by dividing the
sum of collagen fibril area in a TEM image by the total image area.
An autocorrelation function was calculated for the intensity distributions
in the TEM images using “autocorr and acf” functions
in Matlab (Mathworks, Econometrics Toolbox, Natick, MA, U.S.A.). The
peak-to-peak distance between two adjacent peaks from the resulting
plots was calculated to determine the fibril-to-fibril spacing. Lastly,
the TEM images were converted to binary images, a fast Fourier transform
(FFT) algorithm was applied to an oval profile, and “radial
sum” analysis was conducted over 180 points in ImageJ. The
data was shifted by 90° to obtain a central frequency peak for
plotting the percentage of aligned fibrils as frequency (%) as a function
of the angle of alignment. Full-Width-at-Half-Maximum (FWHM) was calculated
from the difference between angles of alignment at which the frequency
of alignment was half.
Fluorescence Recovery
After Photobleaching
(FRAP) Assay
Directionally dependent diffusivity, D, was measured within aligned collagen sheets by Fluorescence
Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP). Briefly, collagen sheets were
incubated in Rhodamine 6G (R6G, 10 mM, Mw = 479.01 g/mol, Sigma-Aldrich) and fluorescein dextran (FITC, 15
μM, Mw = 150 000 g/mol, Sigma-Aldrich)
solutions prepared in glycerol/water buffer. Stained collagen sheets
were transferred and spread uniformly on 100 μm-thick coverslips
(Ted Pella Inc.) and inspected on an inverted confocal microscope
(Nikon Ti Eclipse) with a Nikon APO LWD 40×/1.15 NA WI water
immersion objective (Figure S5A). Each
sample was imaged at low laser power (1%), followed by an intense
laser pulse (100% 5.4 mW power) for 5 s to bleach a small circular
(5 μm diameter) and a 7 μm × 1.5 μm rectangular
region of interest, ROI (Figure S5B). The
time-dependent fluorescence signal was observed in the FITC (560 nm)
and TRITC (595 nm) channels, respectively, and normalized to the intensity
of the unbleached regions surrounding the ROIs. Steric interactions
between dye molecules lead to a difference in diffusivity through
the collagen matrix and the free solution,[34] necessitating the measurement of the free diffusion, D0, of the dyes. The ratio of diffusivity within a sheet
to that in free solution (D/ D0) is shown in Figure S5C. There
were N = 4 replicates for each experimental condition.
Water Permeability Assay
The permeability
coefficient of water through an aligned collagen sheet was measured
using a pressure-driven filtration setup. The setup consisted of a
vacuum filtration assembly (funnel capacity 15 mm, membrane diameter
25 mm, neck diameter 27 mm, Sigma-Aldrich), a vacuum-regulating valve
(McMaster Carr, Elmhurst, IL, U.S.A.), and a pressure gauge to actively
control and monitor the pressure difference applied across the sheet.
Briefly, collagen sheets were cut into 12 mm diameter circular pieces
using a carbon dioxide laser (laser power setting: 2% of 40 W, speed
setting: 50%; model 8000, Epilog Mini Laser, Mississauga, ON, Canada).
The circular sheet was placed on the filtration assembly membrane,
and the area unoccupied by the sheet was sealed with a gasket material
(Sticky Silicone Gel, McMaster Carr) to ensure water only permeated
across the sheet. The permeability coefficient was evaluated based
on the time required for 15 mL of water to permeate across a sheet,
according to equation[35]where Q, δ,
μ,
ΔP, and A represent the volumetric
flow rate, the aligned collagen sheet thickness, the viscosity of
water, the pressure difference across the sheet, and the filtration
area, respectively. There were N = 5 replicates for
each experimental condition.
Cell
Culture
All primary cells were
purchased from Lonza (Walkersville, MD), and cultured at 37 °C
and 5% CO2. Human aortic smooth muscle cells (vSMCs) were
cultured in medium consisting of high-glucose Dulbecco’s modified
Eagle’s medium (DMEM) with serum (20%), insulin (0.13 U/mL),
basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF; 10 ng/mL), epidermal growth
factor (EGF; 0.5 ng/mL), penicillin G (10,000 U/mL), copper sulfate
(3 ng/mL), l-proline (50 ng/mL), l-alanine (40 ng/mL),
and glycine (50 ng/mL) and used prior to passage 9. Human aortic endothelial
cells (HAECs) were cultured in fully supplemented EGM-2 (Lonza, Walkersville,
MD) and used prior to passage 9.
Cell
Alignment Quantification
Collagen
sheets were sterilized in ethanol solution (70%) containing an antibiotic/antimycotic
solution (1%) for 30 min and then rinsed with three washes of PBS
pH 7.4. vSMCs were trypsinized and seeded at a concentration of 40,000
cells/cm2. Cells were allowed to adhere for 4 h and additional
media was then added to the tissue culture well. After appropriate
culture times, samples were stained with calcein AM (2 μM) and
ethidium homodimer (4 μM) and imaged with a Leica SP5 X inverted
confocal microscope (Wetzlar, Germany). Alignment was quantified using
a fast Fourier transform function in ImageJ on an intensity threshold
based binarized image, utilizing the radial summing profile in 5°
increments. These data were then plotted and FWHM calculated. Cell
shape index (CSI), a dimensionless measurement of cell morphologywas quantified using the open source CellProfiler
image analysis software (https://cellprofiler.org) to determine the area (A) and the perimeter (P) of each cell, CSI was calculated as previously described.[36]
Immunofluorescent Staining
Collagen
sheets were sterilized and human aortic endothelial cells (HAECs)
were trypsinized and seeded at density of 100,000 cells/cm2 in fully supplemented EGM-2 onto collagen sheets or into individual
wells of 6-well plates and allowed to adhere for 48 h. Medium was
then replaced with fully supplemented EGM-2 without serum for 24 h
to achieve a quiescent phenotype. Positive control samples were treated
with TNF-α (100 ng/mL in EGM-2) for 4 h prior to fixation and
staining. Samples were fixed in buffered formalin (10%) for 20 min
at 4 °C, then washed three times with PBS pH 7.4 for 5 min each.
Permeabilization was completed with a 5 min incubation in Triton X-100
(0.3%) in PBS and samples were then washed three times with Triton
X-100 (0.1%) in PBS (PBS-T) for 5 min each. Non-specific binding was
blocked for 30 min at room temperature with a solution of Triton X-100
(0.1%) in PBS containing BSA (2%, Abdil) and then washed three times
with PBS-T for 5 min each. Primary antibodies were utilized at 1:50
dilutions (ICAM-1, VCAM-1 (Abcam)). Samples were also stained for
F-actin (1:40 from a 6.6 μM stock solution, Life Technologies)
for 1 h following standard protocol. Samples were mounted with Prolong
Antifade containing DAPI (Life Technologies) and stored at 4 °C
until imaging on a Leica SP5 X inverted confocal microscope (Wetzlar,
Germany).
RT-PCR Analysis
HAECs were seeded
onto collagen sheets or individual wells of 6-well plates, as described
above. Following exposure to TNF-α, cells were washed three
times with PBS, and RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen).[37,38] RNA quantification was performed using a NanoDrop ND-1000 Spectrophotometer
(Thermo Fisher Scientific) and reverse transcription was performed
using 0.5 μg of total RNA per sample with the High Capacity
cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems) using the GeneAmp
PCR System 9600 (PerkinElmer). qPCR was performed using the ViiA 7
Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and accompanying software.
TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) and TaqMan probes
were used for ICAM1 (Hs00164932_m1) and VCAM1 (Hs01003372_m1), as
markers of activation, and RPLPO (Hs00420895_gH), as a housekeeping
gene. Cycle threshold (Ct) raw data values were analyzed using the
delta–delta Ct method to determine whether there were changes
in markers of endothelial cell activation between groups.
Thin Film Contractility Assay
vSMC
contractility was measured on aligned (V* = 4.5)
and weakly aligned (V* = 0.6) collagen sheets using
a thin film-based contractility assay. Briefly, elastic cantilevers
were fabricated by manually dissecting collagen sheets into rectangular
cantilevers that were 7 mm long (x - direction) and
3 mm wide (y - direction). One end of the cantilever
was fixed using PDMS prior to seeding with vSMC (40,000 cells/cm2). Samples were cultured in fully supplemented media at 37
°C for 48 h, followed by 24 h of culture in serum-free media.
During the contractility assay, samples were incubated in Tyrode’s
solution (137 mM NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 1.2 mM MgCl2, 20 mM
HEPES, pH 7.4) at 37 °C. After peeling, the cantilevers were
exposed to a vasoconstrictor (endothelin-1, 100 nM) at t = 5 min, followed by a rho-kinase inhibitor (HA-1077, 100 μM)
at t = 20 min. The deflection of the free edge of
the cantilever was tracked using a stereoscope coupled to a National
Instrument LabVIEW board. A MATLAB code and ImageJ were used to analyze
recorded videos and reduce background noise. Active stress, basal
tone, and residual stress were calculated using a previously published
model.[39,40] By knowing the Young’s modulus, thickness,
and length of the collagen cantilevers, as well as the measured deflection,
the tension can be calculated throughout the experiment. In particular,
active stress and basal tone are defined by the difference in tension
prior to treatment (t = 0) and after endothelin-1
and HA-1077 exposure, respectively. Residual stress is equal to the
tension maintained on the cantilever after HA-1077 treatment.
Statistics
Mean and standard deviation
were obtained for all measurements with a minimum of at least n = 8 for each condition. Comparisons were made using ANOVA
for multiple comparisons, with Tukey post hoc analysis for parametric
data, and Kruskal–Wallis for nonparametric data. Values of p < 0.05 were marked with *, p <
0.01 with **, p < 0.001 with ***, and p < 0.0001 with ****.
Results
and Discussion
Approach for Aligned Collagen
Sheet Formation
Here, we report a microfluidic strategy for
the rapid and continuous
formation of multidimensional collagen structures. Figure A illustrates our strategy
for preparing ultrathin, handleable collagen sheets with precise control
over collagen alignment and compaction. A microfluidic device distributes
a collagen solution uniformly in the lateral direction to form, at
its exit, a multicentimeter-wide collagen layer that is hydrodynamically
focused while passing through a downstream constriction. A floating
collagen sheet with tunable dimensions and anisotropic tensile and
transport properties is obtained by the combined effects of fibrillogenesis
and macromolecular crowding, and the strain applied by passing over
a rotating mandrel.
Figure 1
Schematic of a biofabrication approach for continuous
formation
of ultrathin collagen sheets. Collagen (red) and buffer solutions
(green) are delivered to a three-layered microfluidic device. A collagen
sheet emerges at the device exit, hydrodynamically focused between
buffer solutions, and guided through a geometric constriction. An
emerging collagen sheet undergoes fibrillogenesis and further strained
by passing over a rotating mandrel (velocity V). Continued incubation, washing and drying
results in the production of multicentimeter-wide, meter-long, ultrathin
collagen sheets. (A) Enlarged view of hydrodynamic focusing of a collagen
solution by a geometric flow constriction (L = 2 mm, L = 7.6 mm, H =
1 mm) with pH-induced fibril formation. Fibril alignment within the
collagen sheet is due to both shear forces induced by solution flow
through the geometric constriction, as well as strain imposed on the
generated sheet by a downstream (L = 55 mm) mandrel (diameter D = 12.7 mm).
(B) Schematic illustration of a three-layered microfluidic device
containing hierarchical microchannel networks of width W = 35 mm at the exit. Scale bars (A
and B) 10 mm.
Schematic of a biofabrication approach for continuous
formation
of ultrathin collagen sheets. Collagen (red) and buffer solutions
(green) are delivered to a three-layered microfluidic device. A collagen
sheet emerges at the device exit, hydrodynamically focused between
buffer solutions, and guided through a geometric constriction. An
emerging collagen sheet undergoes fibrillogenesis and further strained
by passing over a rotating mandrel (velocity V). Continued incubation, washing and drying
results in the production of multicentimeter-wide, meter-long, ultrathin
collagen sheets. (A) Enlarged view of hydrodynamic focusing of a collagen
solution by a geometric flow constriction (L = 2 mm, L = 7.6 mm, H =
1 mm) with pH-induced fibril formation. Fibril alignment within the
collagen sheet is due to both shear forces induced by solution flow
through the geometric constriction, as well as strain imposed on the
generated sheet by a downstream (L = 55 mm) mandrel (diameter D = 12.7 mm).
(B) Schematic illustration of a three-layered microfluidic device
containing hierarchical microchannel networks of width W = 35 mm at the exit. Scale bars (A
and B) 10 mm.Briefly, an acidic type I collagen
(pH 2) solution is delivered
at flow rate QC to the center layer of
a three-layered microfluidic device [see ref (30) or Figure S1 for the microfluidic channel pattern]. A flow focusing
buffer (FFB, pH 8) solution is supplied at flow rate QB to the device top and bottom layers (Figure B). A centimeter-wide collagen
layer leaves the device and is hydrodynamically focused[41] between the two buffer solutions at a shear
rate on the order of 101 s–1 while passing
through a downstream constriction. See Figure S2 for a schematic and photograph of the microfluidic fabrication
system.As the collagen solution approaches its isoelectric
point (pH 7.4),[42] the reduced electrostatic
repulsion between
the positively charged collagen molecules and dominant hydrophobic
interactions favor nucleation and growth of fibrils via pH-triggered
fibrillogenesis with self-assembly of collagen molecules into anisotropic
fibrils. In addition, polyethylene glycol (PEG), a molecular crowding
agent and key component in the FFB solution, creates a hypertonic
environment, which causes the expulsion of water from the collagen
layer, resulting in fibrillar compaction[16] with the generation of a free-floating collagen sheet. The sheet
is strained by a rotating mandrel over which it passes, inducing fibril
alignment along the extrusion direction, x. In some
cases, referred to as “strain conditioning”, we applied
strain after sheet formation. To complete collagen fibril growth,
as-produced sheets were incubated at 37 °C for 48 h in a buffer
system to further promote fibrillogenesis,[15] and subsequently washed and dried to increase compaction. The combined
effects of pH induced fibrillogenesis, shear, strain, macromolecular
crowding, and evaporation produces ultrathin, aligned collagen sheets.
Dimensions and Tensile Properties of Ultrathin
Collagen Sheets
Figure A shows a photograph of the extruded collagen sheet.
Collagen sheets of varying thickness and width were obtained by altering
the mandrel velocity (2.3–23 mm/s) at fixed flow rates of Q = 400 μL/min and Q = 4000 μL/min. The mean thickness, δ, of fully
hydrated collagen sheets decreased from 5.2 ± 0.9 μm to
1.9 ± 0.3 μm as V* increased from 0.1
to 10 (Figure B).
The capacity to generate ultrathin, yet handleable collagen sheets
will facilitate structural mimicry of important tissues, such as cornea
and blood vessels, and provides the flexibility of including intervening
layers of additional extracellular matrix components, such as proteoglycans
and growth factors or elastin, in the fabrication of cell populated
multilayer structures, while minimizing the total thickness of the
structure. Similarly, with increasing V*, sheet width
decreased from that at the exit section of the microfluidic device, W = 35.0 mm to 12.0 ±
0.2 mm (V* 10) (Figure C). After washing, Fourier-transform infrared
(FTIR) spectroscopy confirmed the absence of a peak at 1100 cm–1, indicative of the complete removal of PEG in the
prepared collagen sheets (Figure S3). Sheets
exhibited anisotropic tensile properties in the extrusion direction, x, and the lateral direction, y. Sheet
elastic moduli E of
2.9–35.9 MPa and E of 1.5–10.0 MPa (Figure D), were associated with ultimate tensile strengths UTS of 0.5–2.7 MPa and UTS of 0.2–1.4 MPa (Figure E) and increased
with increasing V*. Strain-to-failure in the extrusion
direction, 27.7–12.0%, and the lateral direction, 28.1–13.1%,
(Figure F), decreased
with increasing V*. We attribute the increase in E and UTS to increased fibril compaction
and alignment. Strain conditioning of collagen sheets by 15% further
increased tensile properties for those sheets produced at high V* (see Figure S4 for experimental
setup). Sheets produced at V* = 10 and subsequently
subjected to 15% strain, displayed E = 44 MPa (Figure G), UTS = 5.3 MPa (Figure H), and a strain-to-failure in the alignment direction of 9.1% (Figure I). We attribute
the augmentation of mechanical properties to a further increase in
fibril alignment during continuous straining. Collagen sheets were
produced using a 5 mg/mL collagen solution. While not systematically
evaluated, sheet nanoscale structure and mechanical behavior would
likely be influenced by solution concentration. Using lower concentrations
is expected to extend the gelation time scale and affect the consistency
of extrusion and uniformity of the obtained sheets. Extruding at higher
concentration is expected to shorten the gelation time scale and increase
the elastic modulus and UTS values of the aligned
collagen sheets and reduce the strain-to-failure.[43]
Figure 2
Macro and microscale properties of ultrathin collagen sheets. (A)
Photograph of a collagen sheet produced at V* = 4.5.
Sheet thickness (B) and width (C), as well as elastic modulus (D),
ultimate tensile strength (E), and strain-to-failure (F), in axial, x, and transverse, y, directions for collagen
sheets produced as a function of varying V*. Tensile
properties, including E (G), UTS (H), and
strain-to-failure (I), were measured
for collagen sheets in the axial, x, direction with or without further
(15%) strain conditioning. Scale bar (A) 10 mm. N = 8 for all measurements; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.
Macro and microscale properties of ultrathin collagen sheets. (A)
Photograph of a collagen sheet produced at V* = 4.5.
Sheet thickness (B) and width (C), as well as elastic modulus (D),
ultimate tensile strength (E), and strain-to-failure (F), in axial, x, and transverse, y, directions for collagen
sheets produced as a function of varying V*. Tensile
properties, including E (G), UTS (H), and
strain-to-failure (I), were measured
for collagen sheets in the axial, x, direction with or without further
(15%) strain conditioning. Scale bar (A) 10 mm. N = 8 for all measurements; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.
Strain
Increases Fibril Alignment and Compaction
and Inhibits Molecular Transport
Electron microscopy was
used to evaluate the nanoscale properties of the fabricated sheets. Figure A shows transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) images obtained in the (y–z) and the (x–z) planes, for V* = 0.6, 4.5, and 10. The
increase in fibrillar alignment and compaction is evident from these
images. TEM images obtained in the (x–z) plane and the related autocorrelation function evaluated
in the x-direction, as an ensemble average over all z positions (Figure B), confirmed the presence of a periodic 67 nm D-banding pattern
typical of mature collagen fibrils. As shown in Figure C, fibrils were produced with an average
diameter of 35.1 ± 6.5 nm and was comparable to that reported
in the literature.[15,18] The fibril packing density increased
from 141 ± 46 to 470 ± 61 fibrils/μm2 for V* = 0.6 and 10, respectively (Figure D). Autocorrelating the TEM images in the
(x–z) plane along the z direction, as an ensemble average over all x positions (Figure E), provided a measure of the center-to-center interfibrillar spacing.
Spacing decreased from 92.6 ± 4.5 to 36.3 ± 5.8 nm for V* = 0.6 and 10, respectively (Figure F). Fast Fourier transform (FFT) of TEM images
in the (x–z) plane, reveals
an increase in fibril alignment in the x direction
with increasing V* (Figure . Approximately 70% of fibrils were aligned
within 10° of one another and 40% of fibrils within 5°.
Figure 3
Nanostructure
and molecular features of collagen sheets. (A) TEM
images of collagen sheets produced at V* = 0.6, 4.5,
and 10 in (y–z) and (x–z) planes. (B) Autocorrelation
of TEM images for sheets produced at V* 10 in (x–z) plane revealed collagen fibril
D-periodic banding of ∼67 nm. (C) Collagen fibril diameter
was constant, while (D) fibril packing density increased with V*. (E) Representative autocorrelation function of TEM images
in (x–z) plane to determine
center-to-center fibril spacing for a collagen sheet produced at V* = 10. (F) Fibril spacing decreased from 93 to 36 nm with
increasing V*. (G) Fibril alignment was obtained
from the spectral analysis of TEM images in the (x–z) plane of sheets generated at V* = 0.6, 4.5, and 10. (H) Representative fluorescence recovery
curves for a 5 μm diameter circular bleached region determined
in the (x-y) plane to assess in-plane
diffusion of R6G (ο) and FITC (•) within collagen sheets
(V* = 10). Experimental data were fitted to a model
(dashed line) for determining diffusion times and coefficients. (I)
Measured in-plane diffusivity, D/D. (J) Measured
permeability coefficient for water transport through collagen sheets
at a 3.4 kPa pressure difference. Scale bar (A) 500 nm. N = 8 for all measurements; *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
Nanostructure
and molecular features of collagen sheets. (A) TEM
images of collagen sheets produced at V* = 0.6, 4.5,
and 10 in (y–z) and (x–z) planes. (B) Autocorrelation
of TEM images for sheets produced at V* 10 in (x–z) plane revealed collagen fibril
D-periodic banding of ∼67 nm. (C) Collagen fibril diameter
was constant, while (D) fibril packing density increased with V*. (E) Representative autocorrelation function of TEM images
in (x–z) plane to determine
center-to-center fibril spacing for a collagen sheet produced at V* = 10. (F) Fibril spacing decreased from 93 to 36 nm with
increasing V*. (G) Fibril alignment was obtained
from the spectral analysis of TEM images in the (x–z) plane of sheets generated at V* = 0.6, 4.5, and 10. (H) Representative fluorescence recovery
curves for a 5 μm diameter circular bleached region determined
in the (x-y) plane to assess in-plane
diffusion of R6G (ο) and FITC (•) within collagen sheets
(V* = 10). Experimental data were fitted to a model
(dashed line) for determining diffusion times and coefficients. (I)
Measured in-plane diffusivity, D/D. (J) Measured
permeability coefficient for water transport through collagen sheets
at a 3.4 kPa pressure difference. Scale bar (A) 500 nm. N = 8 for all measurements; *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.Molecular transport across aligned collagen sheets
was evaluated
using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP). Measurements
conducted in the (x–y) plane
for a sheet produced at V* = 10 revealed the directional
dependence of molecular transport as a function of solute molecular
size. Figure H illustrates
fluorescence recovery curves for Rhodamine (R6G, MW 479
g/mol, hydrodynamic diameter 1.2 nm) and FITC-dextran (MW 150 000 g/mol, hydrodynamic diameter 13.8 nm) within a sheet
prepared at V* = 10, which were in agreement with
a stochastic model developed by Axelrod et al.[44] Diffusivity was calculated using the relation D = ω2/4τD where
ω is the radius of the Gaussian bleaching profile and τD is a characteristic diffusion time.
For a circular bleached region, τD was 80 and 932 s for R6G and FITC-dextran, respectively, consistent
with a fluorescence recovery that was 11.7 times faster for R6G than
for FITC-dextran. We attribute this difference to size-exclusion of
FITC-dextran molecules, due to their hydrodynamic diameter being comparable
to the average gap between neighboring fibrils of 1.2 nm, and 11.5-fold
larger than the hydrodynamic diameter of R6G. The effect of anisotropic
fibril alignment on molecular transport was evaluated in the (x–y) plane within a rectangular
bleached region (see Figure S5 for details). Figure I summarizes the
ratio of the diffusion coefficients determined in axial and transverse
directions, D/D, as a function of V*. FITC-dextran molecules diffuse preferentially along
the x-direction. This effect became more pronounced
with increasing V*, due to an increase in molecular
alignment and compaction. At V* = 10, the size exclusion
effect was evident for FITC-dextran, while the smaller R6G molecules
isotropically diffused in the x and the y directions, regardless of V*.Figure J demonstrates the permeability
of water across collagen sheets prepared at varying V*. A decrease in interfibril spacing was associated with a non-significant
reduction in water permeability with measured permeability coefficients
of 10–16 m2; comparable to reports for
type I collagen scaffolds.[45]
Collagen Fibril Alignment Induces Cellular
Alignment and Coordinated Tissue Responses
Human aortic endothelial
cells (ECs) were cultured on collagen sheets for 72 h to evaluate
the effect of fibrillar alignment and compaction on EC morphology
and related cell behavior (Figure A). We investigated collagen sheets extruded at V* = 0.6, 4.5, and 10 in order to investigate cellular properties
at a wide range of alignment (unaligned, semialigned, and highly aligned).
However, no significant differences in cell organization or orientation
were observed. Nonetheless, ECs exhibited a more rounded morphology,
as determined by a cell shape index (CSI) of 0.39 ± 0.07, when
cultured on sheets with limited fibril alignment (V* = 0.6), as compared to those cells grown on highly anisotropic (V* = 10) collagen sheets with an observed CSI of 0.19 ±
0.06 (Figure B). Minimal
expression of inflammatory cell surface markers, ICAM-1 and VCAM-1,
was observed (Figure C), and comparable to cells grown under quiescent culture conditions
on tissue culture plastic. RT-PCR further confirmed that collagen
fibril alignment did not influence expression of ICAM-1 or VCAM-1,
whereas exposure to TNF-α induced a 300- and 3000-fold increase
in gene expression, respectively (Figure D,E).
Figure 4
Collagen fibril alignment influences endothelial
cell morphology
without promoting cellular activation. (A) Human aortic ECs were cultured
on collagen sheets produced at V* = 0.6, 4.5, and
10 over 24 and 72 h. (B) Quantification of EC alignment cultured on
collagen sheets produced at V* = 0.6, 4.5, and 10
by FFT image analysis and corresponding fwhm and cell shape indices
(CSI). (C) Immunofluorescent staining of F-actin and pro-inflammatory
markers, ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 (TCP = tissue culture plastic). RT-PCR
of (D) ICAM-1 and (E) VCAM-1 expression (mean ± SEM). Scale bars
(A) 50 μm and (C) 50 μm. N = 8 for all
measurements; ****p < 0.0001.
Collagen fibril alignment influences endothelial
cell morphology
without promoting cellular activation. (A) Human aortic ECs were cultured
on collagen sheets produced at V* = 0.6, 4.5, and
10 over 24 and 72 h. (B) Quantification of EC alignment cultured on
collagen sheets produced at V* = 0.6, 4.5, and 10
by FFT image analysis and corresponding fwhm and cell shape indices
(CSI). (C) Immunofluorescent staining of F-actin and pro-inflammatory
markers, ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 (TCP = tissue culture plastic). RT-PCR
of (D) ICAM-1 and (E) VCAM-1 expression (mean ± SEM). Scale bars
(A) 50 μm and (C) 50 μm. N = 8 for all
measurements; ****p < 0.0001.As anticipated, collagen fibril alignment had a significant impact
on vascular smooth muscle cell (vSMC) organization. vSMCs cultured
on minimally aligned (V* 0.6) collagen sheets displayed
little measurable alignment, while a high degree of vSMC orientation
was observed on sheets fabricated at V* = 4.5 and
10 in the direction of aligned collagen fibrils (Figure A). When quantified, the full
width at half-maximum for FFT generated plots varied from 72 ±
8° to 49 ± 4° for V* = 0.6 and 10,
respectively. The associated CSI did not vary significantly between
conditions (Figure B). vSMC alignment in the direction of fibril orientation had a corresponding
effect on coordinated contractile responses, which was evaluated using
an approach similar to that described for synthetic cantilevers.[39,40] vSMC-seeded collagen cantilevers were exposed at t = 5 min to a vasoconstrictor, endothelin-1 (100 nM), followed by
a rho-kinase inhibitor (HA-1077, 100 μM) at t = 20 min. Representative images of endothelin-1 induced vasoconstriction
and HA-1077 induced vasorelaxation are shown in Figure C. Quantification of the stress generated
by cell seeded cantilevers revealed that coordinated vasoconstrictive
and vasorelaxation responses were only observed when vSMCs were cultured
on sheets composed of highly aligned collagen fibrils with associated
induction of vSMC alignment (Figure D). Higher absolute values of contractile stress and
residual stress were characteristic of coherently aligned cell-sheet
structures (Figure E). Cell-seeded cantilevers prepared from highly aligned (V* = 10) collagen sheets exhibited a level of contractility
that surpassed the limits of the employed assay, and thus were not
included.
Figure 5
Collagen fibril alignment influences smooth muscle cell orientation
and contractile responses. (A) Human aortic vSMCs cultured on collagen
sheets produced at V* = 0.6, 4.5, and 10 over 24
and 72 h. (B) Quantification of alignment of vSMCs cultured on collagen
sheets produced at V* 0.6, 4.5, and 10 by FFT image
analysis and corresponding FWHM and cell shape indices (CSI). (C)
Vasomotor responses of vSMCs on collagen sheets produced at V* 0.6 (i) and 4.5 (ii) with associated average time traces
of generated stress (D). Samples were stimulated with endothelin 1
(100 nM) at 5 min and HA-1077 (100 μM) at 20 min with measurement
of (E) active stress and basal tone, respectively. Scale bars (A)
50 μm and (C) 1 mm. N = 8 for all measurements;
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Collagen fibril alignment influences smooth muscle cell orientation
and contractile responses. (A) Human aortic vSMCs cultured on collagen
sheets produced at V* = 0.6, 4.5, and 10 over 24
and 72 h. (B) Quantification of alignment of vSMCs cultured on collagen
sheets produced at V* 0.6, 4.5, and 10 by FFT image
analysis and corresponding FWHM and cell shape indices (CSI). (C)
Vasomotor responses of vSMCs on collagen sheets produced at V* 0.6 (i) and 4.5 (ii) with associated average time traces
of generated stress (D). Samples were stimulated with endothelin 1
(100 nM) at 5 min and HA-1077 (100 μM) at 20 min with measurement
of (E) active stress and basal tone, respectively. Scale bars (A)
50 μm and (C) 1 mm. N = 8 for all measurements;
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Conclusions
We have
developed a new biofabrication strategy for the continuous
formation of ultrathin, multicentimeter wide collagen sheets (width-to-thickness
ratio up to 5000) of extended lengths (>230 mm) with tunable degrees
of fibril compaction and orientation. The combination of hydrodynamic
focusing, strain-induced pulling, osmotic gradient induction, and
evaporative drying formed anisotropic aligned collagen sheets with
the extent of fibril alignment and density consistent throughout the
entire structure. This approach provides an unprecedented ability
to rapidly fabricate sheets composed of collagen, presumably with
other ECM proteins as desired, that are strong yet ultrathin. Sheets
produced in this manner are at least 10–20 fold thinner than
prior approaches used to fabricate free-standing collagen sheets and
can be readily applied for direct use or in the structural mimicry
of native tissues. Significantly, the described microfluidic scheme
affords extracellular matrix-based sheets that are 20-fold thinner
than those produced by the decellularization of cell sheets that have
been produced over a culture period of 6 or more weeks.[46,47] Large aspect-ratio collagen sheets with dimensions that ranged from
1.9–5 μm in thickness and 12–24 mm in width were
continuously produced. The degree of alignment and compaction of the
collagen fibrils was controlled, with up to 40% of fibrils aligned
within 5° of one another. As a result, highly aligned collagen
sheets achieved mechanical properties comparable with many tissues
in the body, with elastic moduli of 3–36 MPa, ultimate tensile
strengths of 0.5–2.5 MPa, and strain-to-failure of 12–28%.
In addition, the presence of D-periodic banding of ∼ 67 nm
typical of native collagen fibrils was consistently observed. Cell
behavior was responsive to induced fibril organization, with endothelial
cells exhibiting characteristic morphological changes and vascular
smooth muscle cells displaying preferential alignment in the direction
of collagen fibrils with coordinated vasomotor responses. We believe
that the scalable and free-standing production of handleable, anisotropically
aligned ultrathin collagen sheets of biologically relevant composition,
architecture, dimensions, and mechanical properties will greatly facilitate
the engineering of a variety of load bearing and cell containing multilamellar
structures composed of fibrillar collagen and other ECM proteins,
such as tendons, fascia, cornea, esophagus, intestine, bladder, ureter,
urethra, myocardium, heart and venous valves, and blood vessels.
Authors: Navid Hakimi; Richard Cheng; Lian Leng; Mohammad Sotoudehfar; Phoenix Qing Ba; Nazihah Bakhtyar; Saeid Amini-Nik; Marc G Jeschke; Axel Günther Journal: Lab Chip Date: 2018-05-15 Impact factor: 6.799
Authors: A Lee; A R Hudson; D J Shiwarski; J W Tashman; T J Hinton; S Yerneni; J M Bliley; P G Campbell; A W Feinberg Journal: Science Date: 2019-08-02 Impact factor: 47.728