| Literature DB >> 32685480 |
Yanwu Chen1, Bin Wu2, Cheng Zhang1, Zhiqi Fan1,3, Ying Chen1, Bingmu Xin1,2, Qiong Xie2.
Abstract
During a spaceflight, astronauts need to live in a spacecraft on orbit for a long time, and the relationship between humans and microorganisms in the closed environment of space is not the same as on the ground. The dynamic study of microorganisms in confined space shows that with the extension of the isolation time, harmful bacteria gradually accumulate. Monitoring and controlling microbial pollution in a confined environment system are very important for crew health and the sustainable operation of a space life support system. Culture-based assays have been used traditionally to assess the microbial loads in a spacecraft, and uncultured-based techniques are already under way according to the NASA global exploration roadmap. High-throughput sequencing technology has been used generally to study the communities of the environment and human on the ground and shows its broad prospects applied onboard. We here review the recent application of high-throughput sequencing on space microbiology and analyze its feasibility and potential as an on-orbit detection technology.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32685480 PMCID: PMC7327617 DOI: 10.1155/2020/4094191
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Comparison of cultural methods and noncultural methods.
| Object | Methods | Advantages | Limitations | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cultural methods | Air | The air sampler package | Ability to monitor microbial populations on orbit | Long analysis period, the existence of unculturable microorganisms, risk of recontamination |
| Noncultural methods | Air, surface, and water | The fluorescence analyzer; LOCAD-PTS | Fast | Unable to identify microbial species |
| Microfluidic PCR | High accuracy, fast | Able to identify known species, unable to identify unknown species | ||
| High-throughput sequencing | Fast, high throughput, and high accuracy | Lack of sequencers on orbit, generally analyzed on the ground |
Figure 1LOCAD-PTS microbial rapid detection installation.
Comparison of three generation sequencing technologies.
| Principle of sequencing | Technical platform | Read length | Advantages | Limitations | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The first generation | Chain termination method | Sanger | 1000 bp | High accuracy, long read lengths | Low throughput, high cost, and low efficiency |
| The second generation | Pyrosequencing, sequencing by synthesis, sequencing by ligation | Roche/454, Illumina/Solexa, ABI/SOLiD | 150-300 bp | High throughput, high accuracy, and low cost | Short read lengths, resulting in difficulties in repetitive/homopolymer regions, subsequence data analysis and genome assembly |
| The third generation | Sequencing by synthesis (DNA polymerase), electronic signal sequencing (exonuclease) | PacBio SMRT, nanopore | 2-10 kb | Longest average read length, no amplification of sequencing fragments, portable | Low accuracy, dependence on DNA polymerase or exonuclease activity |
Figure 2Nanopore DNA sequencing using electronic signals as detection methods. The diameter of the nanoscale is very small, and only a single DNA molecule is allowed to pass through. When a single strand of DNA passes through, it blocks the flow of ions and changes the current intensity across the nanopore. Because the charge properties of the four bases of ATCG are different, the type of base passed is identified according to the change property [25–28].