| Literature DB >> 32685208 |
Naphatsanan Duansak1, Pritsana Piyabhan1, Umarat Srisawat1, Jarinyaporn Naowaboot2, Nusiri Lerdvuthisopon3, Geert Schmid-Schönbein4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inflammation and hypertension are primary mechanisms involving in obesity-associated adverse effects of a high-fat diet. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of rice bran extract (RBE) on arterial blood pressure, hepatic steatosis, inflammation, and oxidative stress in high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obese mice.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32685208 PMCID: PMC7341425 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8374287
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nutr Metab ISSN: 2090-0724
Sequences of primers used for the RT-PCR analysis.
| Genes | Primer sequences | Product length (bp) |
|---|---|---|
| eNOS3 | Forward: 5′-TGTCACTATGGCAACCAGCGT-3′ | 148 |
| Reverse: 5′-GCGCAATGTGAGTCCGAAAA-3′ | ||
|
| ||
| GAPDH | Forward: 5′-ACCCCAGCAAGGACACTGAGCAAG-3′ | 92 |
| Reverse: 5′-TGGGGGTCTGGGATGGAAATTGTG-3′ | ||
Effect of RBE on food intake, body weight, and tissue weight.
| CON | HFD | HFD-RBE 220 | HFD-RBE 1100 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Food intake (g/day/mouse) | 3.1 ± 0.1 | 3.6 ± 0.1 | 3.7 ± 0.2 | 3.8 ± 0.5 |
| Final body weight (g) | 37.5 ± 0.8 | 45.9 ± 0.8 | 40.5 ± 0.4 | 38.9 ± 0.6 |
| White adipose tissue weight (g) | 0.29 ± 0.11 | 0.74 ± 0.11 | 0.53 ± 0.27 | 0.48 ± .023# |
Values are mean ± SEM. P < 0.05 when compared to the control; #P < 0.05 when compared to the HFD group. CON: normal mice on control diet; HFD: HFD-induced obese mice; HFD + RBE: HFD-induced obese mice + RBE 220 and 1100 mg/kg (n = 6 rats/group).
Effects of RBE on blood pressure.
| Control | HFD | HFD-RBE 220 | HFD-RBE 1100 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Systolic (mmHg) | 127 ± 10 | 199 ± 20 | 182 ± 12 | 183 ± 11 |
| Diastolic (mmHg) | 85 ± 7 | 169 ± 15 | 131 ± 25 | 116 ± 20 |
Values are mean ± SEM. P < 0.05 when compared to the normal; #P < 0.05 when compared to the HFD group (n = 6 rats/group).
Figure 1Effect of RBE on liver TNF-α (a), serum TNF-α (b), and liver TBARS (c). P < 0.05 when compared to the normal control group; #P < 0.05 when compared to the HFD group.
Figure 2Effect of RBE administration for 8 weeks on lipid accumulation in the liver of HFD-induced obese mice. Liver tissue was stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Length bar = 50 μm. (a) The RBE treatment decreased lipid accumulation in the liver. Hepatocytes of obese mice were filled with macrovesicular fat deposits while microvesicular fat deposits were found to a lesser extent in obese mice treated with RBE. Arrowheads indicate lipid droplets. Effect of RBE on liver weight (b), total cholesterol (c), and triglyceride (d) in high-fat diet-induced obese mice. P < 0.05 when compared to the normal control group.
Figure 3Effect of RBE on (a) hepatic NF-κB and on (b) myocardium NF-κB. P < 0.05 compared to CON; #P < 0.05 compared to the HFD group. Scale = 50 μm.
Figure 4Immunohistochemical images of myocardial (a) COX-2 and (b) MMP-9 (scale bar = 100 μm) with digital measurements (bar graphs). P < 0.05 compared to CON; #P < 0.05 compared to the HFD group.
Figure 5mRNA expression of eNOS in the aorta. Results are expressed as fold change over mice fed a control diet (CON). P < 0.05 compared to the normal control group. #P < 0.05 compared to the HFD group.