Literature DB >> 32684056

Patient preferences for first-line treatment of classical Hodgkin lymphoma: a US survey and discrete choice experiment.

Niloufer Khan1, Joseph Feliciano2, Kerstin Müller3, Mary He3, Rei Tao3, Ellen Korol3, Mehul Dalal4, Mayvis Rebeira2, Matthew Matasar1,5.   

Abstract

A cross-sectional online survey, including a discrete choice experiment (DCE), was used to investigate first-line treatment preferences in patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) in the United States; 141 patients (median age 35.0 years) participated. In the DCE, risk of progression at 2 years (progression free survival) had the highest relative importance to patients (31.3%) when considering first-line treatments, followed by 2-year overall survival (OS; 26.9%), on-treatment pulmonary toxicity (23.3%), and on-treatment peripheral neuropathy (18.5%). Marginal rate of substitution analyses demonstrated that a 0.44% and 0.09% increase in 2-year OS was required for patients to accept a 1% increase in the risk of disease progression at 2 years and peripheral neuropathy, respectively. A 2.6% increase in 2-year OS was needed to accept a 7% rather than a 2% risk of pulmonary toxicity. In summary, patients with cHL rated survival attributes as more important than drug-related toxicity when considering first-line treatments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hodgkin; discrete choice experiment; first-line treatment; patient preference

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32684056      PMCID: PMC9175565          DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1783443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma        ISSN: 1026-8022


  29 in total

Review 1.  State-of-the-art issues in Hodgkin's lymphoma survivorship.

Authors:  Shrujal S Baxi; Matthew J Matasar
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Preferences of patients and physicians concerning treatment options for relapsed follicular lymphoma: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  M Shafey; S M Lupichuk; T Do; C Owen; D A Stewart
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Second Cancer Risk Up to 40 Years after Treatment for Hodgkin's Lymphoma.

Authors:  Michael Schaapveld; Berthe M P Aleman; Anna M van Eggermond; Cécile P M Janus; Augustinus D G Krol; Richard W M van der Maazen; Judith Roesink; John M M Raemaekers; Jan Paul de Boer; Josée M Zijlstra; Gustaaf W van Imhoff; Eefke J Petersen; Philip M P Poortmans; Max Beijert; Marnix L Lybeert; Ina Mulder; Otto Visser; Marieke W J Louwman; Inge M Krul; Pieternella J Lugtenburg; Flora E van Leeuwen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force.

Authors:  John F P Bridges; A Brett Hauber; Deborah Marshall; Andrew Lloyd; Lisa A Prosser; Dean A Regier; F Reed Johnson; Josephine Mauskopf
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 5.725

5.  Discrete choice experiment to estimate breast cancer patients' preferences and willingness to pay for prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factors.

Authors:  Phaedra Johnson; Tim Bancroft; Richard Barron; Jason Legg; Xiaoyan Li; Holly Watson; Arash Naeim; Angela Watkins; Deborah A Marshall
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 5.725

6.  Escalated-dose BEACOPP in the treatment of patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: 10 years of follow-up of the GHSG HD9 study.

Authors:  Andreas Engert; Volker Diehl; Jeremy Franklin; Andreas Lohri; Bernd Dörken; Wolf-Dieter Ludwig; Peter Koch; Mathias Hänel; Michael Pfreundschuh; Martin Wilhelm; Lorenz Trümper; Walter-Erich Aulitzky; Martin Bentz; Mathias Rummel; Orhan Sezer; Hans-Konrad Müller-Hermelink; Dirk Hasenclever; Markus Löffler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Hodgkin lymphoma: 2018 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management.

Authors:  Stephen M Ansell
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 10.047

8.  Brentuximab vedotin with chemotherapy for stage III/IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma: 3-year update of the ECHELON-1 study.

Authors:  David J Straus; Monika Długosz-Danecka; Sergey Alekseev; Árpád Illés; Marco Picardi; Ewa Lech-Maranda; Tatyana Feldman; Piotr Smolewski; Kerry J Savage; Nancy L Bartlett; Jan Walewski; Radhakrishnan Ramchandren; Pier Luigi Zinzani; Martin Hutchings; Joseph M Connors; John Radford; Javier Munoz; Won Seog Kim; Ranjana Advani; Stephen M Ansell; Anas Younes; Harry Miao; Rachael Liu; Keenan Fenton; Andres Forero-Torres; Andrea Gallamini
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Patients' preferences: a discrete-choice experiment for treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Axel C Mühlbacher; Susanne Bethge
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-08-19

10.  How do women trade-off benefits and risks in chemotherapy treatment decisions based on gene expression profiling for early-stage breast cancer? A discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Deborah A Marshall; Ken Deal; Yvonne Bombard; Natasha Leighl; Karen V MacDonald; Maureen Trudeau
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Patient Preferences for Treatment Outcomes in Oncology with a Focus on the Older Patient-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Petronella A L Nelleke Seghers; Anke Wiersma; Suzanne Festen; Mariken E Stegmann; Pierre Soubeyran; Siri Rostoft; Shane O'Hanlon; Johanneke E A Portielje; Marije E Hamaker
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 6.639

2.  Application of Discrete Choice Experiment in Health Care: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Yue Wang; Zhangyi Wang; Zhao Wang; Xuechun Li; Xiaoli Pang; Shuling Wang
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-06-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.