| Literature DB >> 31945149 |
David J Straus1, Monika Długosz-Danecka2, Sergey Alekseev3, Árpád Illés4, Marco Picardi5, Ewa Lech-Maranda6, Tatyana Feldman7, Piotr Smolewski8, Kerry J Savage9,10, Nancy L Bartlett11, Jan Walewski12, Radhakrishnan Ramchandren13, Pier Luigi Zinzani14, Martin Hutchings15, Joseph M Connors9,10, John Radford16,17, Javier Munoz18, Won Seog Kim19, Ranjana Advani20, Stephen M Ansell21, Anas Younes1, Harry Miao22, Rachael Liu22, Keenan Fenton23, Andres Forero-Torres23, Andrea Gallamini24.
Abstract
The phase 3 ECHELON-1 study demonstrated that brentuximab vedotin (A) with doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (AVD; A+AVD) exhibited superior modified progression-free survival (PFS) vs doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) for frontline treatment of patients with stage III/IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Maturing positron emission tomography (PET)-adapted trial data highlight potential limitations of PET-adapted approaches, including toxicities with dose intensification and higher-than-expected relapse rates in PET scan after cycle 2 (PET2)-negative (PET2-) patients. We present an update of the ECHELON-1 study, including an exploratory analysis of 3-year PFS per investigator. A total of 1334 patients with stage III or IV cHL were randomized 1:1 to receive 6 cycles of A+AVD (n = 664) or ABVD (n = 670). Interim PET2 was required. At median follow-up of 37 months, 3-year PFS rates were 83.1% with A+AVD and 76.0% with ABVD; 3-year PFS rates in PET2- patients aged <60 years were 87.2% vs 81.0%, respectively. A beneficial trend in PET2+ patients aged <60 years on A+AVD was also observed, with a 3-year PFS rate of 69.2% vs 54.7% with ABVD. The benefit of A+AVD in the intent-to-treat population appeared independent of disease stage and prognostic risk factors. Upon continued follow-up, 78% of patients with peripheral neuropathy on A+AVD had either complete resolution or improvement compared with 83% on ABVD. These data highlight that A+AVD provides a durable efficacy benefit compared with ABVD for frontline stage III/IV cHL, consistent across key subgroups regardless of patient status at PET2, without need for treatment intensification or bleomycin exposure. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01712490 (EudraCT no. 2011-005450-60).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31945149 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2019003127
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood ISSN: 0006-4971 Impact factor: 22.113