| Literature DB >> 32682412 |
Sarah L Garvey1, Maziyar M Khansari2,3, Xuejuan Jiang2, Rohit Varma4, Mahnaz Shahidi5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a microvascular complication of diabetes and a leading cause of blindness in working-age adults. The likelihood of visual impairment associated with DR is two-fold higher in the African-American (AA) compared to non-Hispanic white. Although alterations in retinal vessel oxygenation and morphology have been reported in DR, there is limited knowledge about these vascular changes in AA subjects. The purpose of the current study was to investigate alterations in retinal vascular oxygen saturation (SO2), vessel diameter (D) and tortuosity at severity stages of DR in AA subjects.Entities:
Keywords: African American; Diabetic retinopathy; Image analysis; Oxygenation; Tortuosity
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32682412 PMCID: PMC7368779 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-020-01566-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ophthalmol ISSN: 1471-2415 Impact factor: 2.209
Fig. 1Example of a retinal image at 532 nm in a non-diabetic subject. (a) Oxygen saturation measurements in retinal arteries and veins are displayed in pseudo color. Color bar represents hemoglobin oxygen saturation in units of percent. (b) Retinal vessel centerlines (red lines) used for tortuosity measurements are overlaid on the retinal image
Subjects’ demographics. ND, NDR, and NPDR stand for non-diabetic, diabetic without diabetic retinopathy, and moderate/severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy, respectively. MAP is mean arterial pressure, HbA1C is glycosylated hemoglobin, and IOP is intraocular pressure
| 57 ± 13 | 64 ± 12 | 57 ± 13 | 0.21 | |
| 97 ± 14 | 95 ± 11 | 95 ± 17 | 0.87 | |
| 5.6 ± 0.4 | 7.4 ± 1.4 | 8.5 ± 2.0 | < 0.001 | |
| 13.9 ± 2.9 | 16.0 ± 4.1 | 15.3 ± 2.6 | 0.11 | |
| 23.6 ± 0.9 | 23.5 ± 0.9 | 23.3 ± 0.3 | 0.52 | |
| 7.5 ± 5.4 | 10.4 ± 9.4 | 0.35 |
Fig. 2Mean and standard deviation of retinal arterial and venous SO2. There was no significant difference in SO2A among ND, NDR, and NPDR groups, while SO2V was higher in NPDR compared to ND and NDR groups
Fig. 3Mean and standard deviation of retinal arterial and venous D. There was no significant difference in DA among ND, NDR, and NPDR groups, while DV was higher in NPDR compared to ND and NDR groups
Fig. 4Mean and standard deviation of retinal arterial and venous maximum VTI. Maximum VTIA was higher in NDR and NPDR compared to ND, whereas there was no significant difference in maximum VTIV among groups