Literature DB >> 32681415

Bigger Necks Are Not Enough: An Examination of Neck Circumference in Incoming College Athletes.

Carrie Esopenko1, Nicola de Souza2, Fiona Conway3, Sabrina M Todaro4, Kyle Brostrand5,6, Jason Womack6,7, Robert Monaco8, Jennifer F Buckman4.   

Abstract

Neck circumference is quick and simple to measure and thus an attractive proxy of neck strength, a putative mechanism underlying risk of sport-related concussion (SRC). Research, however, is limited on the relationship of neck circumference to SRC. Our study examined differences in neck circumference based on sex, concussion history, concussions experienced subsequent to college entry, and participation in sports with high versus low risk for contact. Neck circumference was measured in incoming NCAA Division I athletes (N = 324) from a large northeastern university during athlete pre-participation physicals. Sex, sport team, and self-reported concussion history were obtained from retrospective pre-participation questionnaires and medical chart review. Concussion diagnoses during college were collected subsequent to neck measurements from medical chart review. Proportional neck circumference (normalized by body mass index) was computed. Each sport was categorized as involving high or low risk of contact (as a proxy of risk for injury). Sex differences in neck circumference and proportional neck circumference were assessed. Differences in neck circumference and proportional neck circumference were also characterized by contact risk and SRC history (with biological sex included as a covariate). Differences in neck circumference and proportional neck circumference were explored among those who did versus did not experience subsequent SRC diagnosis. Males had significantly larger neck circumference and proportional neck circumference than females. Neck circumference and proportional neck circumference were not related to SRC history or subsequent SRC. Neck circumference is a quick and simple measure; however, even when considered in proportion to body mass, it was unrelated to SRC. Future studies are needed to assess whether this is due to a lack of relationship between the neck and injury or limitations in circumference as a proxy measure of cervical spine characteristics and biomechanics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Athletes; Concussion; Neck circumference; Sex differences

Year:  2020        PMID: 32681415      PMCID: PMC7486230          DOI: 10.1007/s10935-020-00600-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prim Prev        ISSN: 0278-095X


  15 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanics of sport concussion: quest for the elusive injury threshold.

Authors:  Kevin M Guskiewicz; Jason P Mihalik
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.230

2.  Gender differences in head-neck segment dynamic stabilization during head acceleration.

Authors:  Ryan T Tierney; Michael R Sitler; C Buz Swanik; Kathleen A Swanik; Michael Higgins; Joseph Torg
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  The role of age and sex in symptoms, neurocognitive performance, and postural stability in athletes after concussion.

Authors:  Tracey Covassin; R J Elbin; William Harris; Tonya Parker; Anthony Kontos
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Sex-Based Differences in Cognitive Deficits and Symptom Reporting Among Acutely Concussed Adolescent Lacrosse and Soccer Players.

Authors:  Natalie K Sandel; Philip Schatz; Kenneth B Goldberg; Mary Lazar
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Sex and age differences in head acceleration during purposeful soccer heading.

Authors:  Jaclyn B Caccese; Thomas A Buckley; Ryan T Tierney; William C Rose; Joseph J Glutting; Thomas W Kaminski
Journal:  Res Sports Med       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 4.674

6.  The Potential Role of the Cervical Spine in Sports-Related Concussion: Clinical Perspectives and Considerations for Risk Reduction.

Authors:  Michael Streifer; Allison M Brown; Tara Porfido; Ellen Zambo Anderson; Jennifer F Buckman; Carrie Esopenko
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 4.751

7.  Neck strength: a protective factor reducing risk for concussion in high school sports.

Authors:  Christy L Collins; Erica N Fletcher; Sarah K Fields; Lisa Kluchurosky; Mary Kay Rohrkemper; R Dawn Comstock; Robert C Cantu
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2014-10

Review 8.  Medical conditions affecting sports participation.

Authors:  Stephen G Rice
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Sex differences in head acceleration during heading while wearing soccer headgear.

Authors:  Ryan T Tierney; Michael Higgins; Shane V Caswell; Jessica Brady; Krista McHardy; Jeffrey B Driban; Kurosh Darvish
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 10.  Predictors of clinical recovery from concussion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Grant L Iverson; Andrew J Gardner; Douglas P Terry; Jennie L Ponsford; Allen K Sills; Donna K Broshek; Gary S Solomon
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 13.800

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.