Literature DB >> 32680914

Preprint Servers in Kidney Disease Research: A Rapid Review.

Caitlyn Vlasschaert1, Cameron Giles1, Swapnil Hiremath2, Matthew B Lanktree3.   

Abstract

Preprint servers, such as arXiv and bioRxiv, have disrupted the scientific communication landscape by providing rapid access to research before peer review. medRxiv was launched as a free online repository for preprints in the medical, clinical, and related health sciences in 2019. In this review, we present the uptake of preprint server use in nephrology and discuss specific considerations regarding preprint server use in medicine. Distribution of kidney-related research on preprint servers is rising at an exponential rate. Survey of nephrology journals identified that 15 of 17 (88%) are publishing original research accepted submissions that have been uploaded to preprint servers. After reviewing 52 clinically impactful trials in nephrology discussed in the online Nephrology Journal Club (NephJC), an average lag of 300 days was found between study completion and publication, indicating an opportunity for faster research dissemination. Rapid review of papers discussing benefits and risks of preprint server use from the researcher, publisher, or end user perspective identified 53 papers that met criteria. Potential benefits of biomedical preprint servers included rapid dissemination, improved transparency of the peer review process, greater visibility and recognition, and collaboration. However, these benefits come at the risk of rapid spread of results not yet subjected to the rigors of peer review. Preprint servers shift the burden of critical appraisal to the reader. Media may be especially at risk due to their focus on "late-breaking" information. Preprint servers have played an even larger role when late-breaking research results are of special interest, such as during the global coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Coronavirus disease 2019 has brought both the benefits and risks of preprint servers to the forefront. Given the prominent online presence of the nephrology community, it is poised to lead the medicine community in appropriate use of preprint servers.
Copyright © 2021 by the American Society of Nephrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Preprint; education; kidney disease; peer review; social media

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32680914      PMCID: PMC8011003          DOI: 10.2215/CJN.03800320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1555-9041            Impact factor:   8.237


  42 in total

1.  Preprints: recall Nature's nasty past.

Authors:  Matthew Cobb
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  BioRxiv preprint server gets cash boost from Chan Zuckerberg Initiative.

Authors:  Ewen Callaway
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Preprints could promote confusion and distortion.

Authors:  Tom Sheldon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY. Preprints for the life sciences.

Authors:  Jeremy M Berg; Needhi Bhalla; Philip E Bourne; Martin Chalfie; David G Drubin; James S Fraser; Carol W Greider; Michael Hendricks; Chonnettia Jones; Robert Kiley; Susan King; Marc W Kirschner; Harlan M Krumholz; Ruth Lehmann; Maria Leptin; Bernd Pulverer; Brooke Rosenzweig; John E Spiro; Michael Stebbins; Carly Strasser; Sowmya Swaminathan; Paul Turner; Ronald D Vale; K VijayRaghavan; Cynthia Wolberger
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Preprints: a Timely Counterbalance for Big Data-Driven Research.

Authors:  Amol A Verma; Allan S Detsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Medical Preprints-A Debate Worth Having.

Authors:  David M Maslove
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Introducing preLights: preprint highlights, selected by the biological community.

Authors:  Katherine Brown; Olivier Pourquié
Journal:  Development       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  Preprints and Scholarly Communication: Adoption, Practices, Drivers and Barriers.

Authors:  Andrea Chiarelli; Rob Johnson; Stephen Pinfield; Emma Richens
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-06-26

Review 9.  The Social Media Revolution in Nephrology Education.

Authors:  Gates B Colbert; Joel Topf; Kenar D Jhaveri; Tom Oates; Michelle N Rheault; Silvi Shah; Swapnil Hiremath; Matthew A Sparks
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2018-02-17

Review 10.  Technical and social issues influencing the adoption of preprints in the life sciences.

Authors:  Naomi C Penfold; Jessica K Polka
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The Impact of COVID-19 on Patients With ADPKD.

Authors:  Meherzad Kutky; Erin Cross; Darin J Treleaven; Ahsan Alam; Matthew B Lanktree
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2021-11-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.