Literature DB >> 32141042

Preprints: a Timely Counterbalance for Big Data-Driven Research.

Amol A Verma1,2,3, Allan S Detsky4,5.   

Abstract

Big data promises to spark new discoveries but may also distort clinical research. Large datasets that permit numerous analyses could increase the number of spurious findings and threaten the reproducibility and validity of clinical research. The publication of unreproducible research is incentivized by a scientific culture that rewards novelty over rigor. Introducing preprint publication to clinical research could change the culture. The first clinical preprint platform, medRxiv, allows researchers to publish working papers in advance of peer-review to more easily share preliminary findings. Preprint publishing aims to be fast and frictionless, which fundamentally changes the incentive structure of academic publishing. Preprints offer a relatively weak reward (a preprint publication) for substantially less effort than peer-review publication. By reducing barriers to publication, preprints may help encourage scientists to publish null findings, which could mitigate publication bias. By enabling scientists to share preliminary work and publish evolving versions of manuscripts, preprints may also facilitate "workshopping" of ideas and detailed methodological review. This would better reflect the iterative nature of observational research than peer-reviewed publications, which immutably document the "final" results of a study. Preprint platforms are a timely innovation that may buffer the undesired effects of big data on clinical research.

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32141042      PMCID: PMC7351908          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-05746-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  6 in total

1.  New preprint server for medical research.

Authors:  Claire Rawlinson; Theodora Bloom
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-06-05

2.  The inevitable application of big data to health care.

Authors:  Travis B Murdoch; Allan S Detsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The Rush to Publication: An Editorial and Scientific Mistake.

Authors:  Howard Bauchner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Medical Preprints-A Debate Worth Having.

Authors:  David M Maslove
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Reproducibility of clinical research in critical care: a scoping review.

Authors:  Daniel J Niven; T Jared McCormick; Sharon E Straus; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Lianne Jeffs; Tavish R M Barnes; Henry T Stelfox
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 8.775

6.  Why most published research findings are false.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 11.613

  6 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Preprint Servers in Kidney Disease Research: A Rapid Review.

Authors:  Caitlyn Vlasschaert; Cameron Giles; Swapnil Hiremath; Matthew B Lanktree
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 8.237

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.