Literature DB >> 32679103

Genome Size Affects Fitness in the Eukaryotic Alga Dunaliella tertiolecta.

Martino E Malerba1, Giulia Ghedini2, Dustin J Marshall3.   

Abstract

Genome size is tightly coupled to morphology, ecology, and evolution among species [1-5], with one of the best-known patterns being the relationship between cell size and genome size [6, 7]. Classic theories, such as the "selfish DNA hypothesis," posit that accumulating redundant DNA has fitness costs but that larger cells can tolerate larger genomes, leading to a positive relationship between cell size and genome size [8, 9]. Yet the evidence for fitness costs associated with relatively larger genomes remains circumstantial. Here, we estimated the relationships between genome size, cell size, energy fluxes, and fitness across 72 independent lineages in a eukaryotic phytoplankton. Lineages with relatively smaller genomes had higher fitness, in terms of both maximum growth rate and total biovolume reached at carrying capacity, but paradoxically, they also had lower energy fluxes than lineages with relative larger genomes. We then explored the evolutionary trajectories of absolute genome size over 100 generations and across a 10-fold change in cell size. Despite consistent directional selection across all lineages, genome size decreased by 11% in lineages with absolutely larger genomes but showed little evolution in lineages with absolutely smaller genomes, implying a lower absolute limit in genome size. Our results suggest that the positive relationship between cell size and genome size in nature may be the product of conflicting evolutionary pressures, on the one hand, to minimize redundant DNA and maximize performance-as theory predicts-but also to maintain a minimum level of essential function. VIDEO ABSTRACT.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C-value enigma; evolutionary lag; genome reduction; genome streamlining; junk DNA hypothesis; large genome constraint hypothesis; nucleoskeletal theory; nucleotypic theory; optimal DNA theory; selfish DNA hypothesis

Year:  2020        PMID: 32679103     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.06.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  4 in total

1.  Impact of Genome Reduction in Microsporidia.

Authors:  Nathan Jespersen; Leonardo Monrroy; Jonas Barandun
Journal:  Exp Suppl       Date:  2022

2.  Long-term experimental evolution decouples size and production costs in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Dustin J Marshall; Martino Malerba; Thomas Lines; Aysha L Sezmis; Chowdhury M Hasan; Richard E Lenski; Michael J McDonald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 3.  Regulation of organelle size and organization during development.

Authors:  Pan Chen; Daniel L Levy
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 7.499

4.  Genome Size Covaries More Positively with Propagule Size than Adult Size: New Insights into an Old Problem.

Authors:  Douglas S Glazier
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.