Yang Yang1, Yi Du1, Igor A Kaltashov1. 1. Department of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, 240 Thatcher Way, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, United States.
Abstract
The emergence and rapid proliferation of the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) resulted in a global pandemic, with over 6,000,000 cases and nearly 400,000 deaths reported worldwide by the end of May 2020. A rush to find a cure prompted re-evaluation of a range of existing therapeutics vis-à-vis their potential role in treating COVID-19, placing a premium on analytical tools capable of supporting such efforts. Native mass spectrometry (MS) has long been a tool of choice in supporting the mechanistic studies of drug/therapeutic target interactions, but its applications remain limited in the cases that involve systems with a high level of structural heterogeneity. Both SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S-protein), a critical element of the viral entry to the host cell, and ACE2, its docking site on the host cell surface, are extensively glycosylated, making them challenging targets for native MS. However, supplementing native MS with a gas-phase ion manipulation technique (limited charge reduction) allows meaningful information to be obtained on the noncovalent complexes formed by ACE2 and the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the S-protein. Using this technique in combination with molecular modeling also allows the role of heparin in destabilizing the ACE2/RBD association to be studied, providing critical information for understanding the molecular mechanism of its interference with the virus docking to the host cell receptor. Both short (pentasaccharide) and relatively long (eicosasaccharide) heparin oligomers form 1:1 complexes with RBD, indicating the presence of a single binding site. This association alters the protein conformation (to maximize the contiguous patch of the positive charge on the RBD surface), resulting in a notable decrease in its ability to associate with ACE2. The destabilizing effect of heparin is more pronounced in the case of the longer chains due to the electrostatic repulsion between the low-pI ACE2 and the heparin segments not accommodated on the RBD surface. In addition to providing important mechanistic information on attenuation of the ACE2/RBD association by heparin, the study demonstrates the yet untapped potential of native MS coupled to gas-phase ion chemistry as a means of facilitating rational repurposing of the existing medicines for treating COVID-19.
The emergence and rapid proliferation of the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) resulted in a global pandemic, with over 6,000,000 cases and nearly 400,000 deaths reported worldwide by the end of May 2020. A rush to find a cure prompted re-evaluation of a range of existing therapeutics vis-à-vis their potential role in treating COVID-19, placing a premium on analytical tools capable of supporting such efforts. Native mass spectrometry (MS) has long been a tool of choice in supporting the mechanistic studies of drug/therapeutic target interactions, but its applications remain limited in the cases that involve systems with a high level of structural heterogeneity. Both SARS-CoV-2spike protein (S-protein), a critical element of the viral entry to the host cell, and ACE2, its docking site on the host cell surface, are extensively glycosylated, making them challenging targets for native MS. However, supplementing native MS with a gas-phase ion manipulation technique (limited charge reduction) allows meaningful information to be obtained on the noncovalent complexes formed by ACE2 and the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the S-protein. Using this technique in combination with molecular modeling also allows the role of heparin in destabilizing the ACE2/RBD association to be studied, providing critical information for understanding the molecular mechanism of its interference with the virus docking to the host cell receptor. Both short (pentasaccharide) and relatively long (eicosasaccharide) heparin oligomers form 1:1 complexes with RBD, indicating the presence of a single binding site. This association alters the protein conformation (to maximize the contiguous patch of the positive charge on the RBD surface), resulting in a notable decrease in its ability to associate with ACE2. The destabilizing effect of heparin is more pronounced in the case of the longer chains due to the electrostatic repulsion between the low-pI ACE2 and the heparin segments not accommodated on the RBD surface. In addition to providing important mechanistic information on attenuation of the ACE2/RBD association by heparin, the study demonstrates the yet untapped potential of native MS coupled to gas-phase ion chemistry as a means of facilitating rational repurposing of the existing medicines for treating COVID-19.
The emergence of the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) in late 2019[1] resulted in a global pandemic that had left virtually no
country in the world unaffected.[2] The new disease (termed
COVID-19) claimed over 400,000 lives worldwide by the end of May 2020, with
the number of new cases still averaging over 100,000 daily in early June.
This global crisis has resulted in a rush to find effective treatments for
COVID-19, with strategies relying on repurposing of the existing medicines
given high priority.[3] While the initial efforts were
largely empirical,[4,5] the rapid progress in understanding the etiology of
COVID-19 and accumulation of the vast body of knowledge on the SARS-CoV-2
life cycle and its mechanism of infectivity provided an extensive list of
therapeutic targets for rational intervention.[6] One such
high-value target is the viral spike protein (S-protein),[7] which is critical for both docking of the viral particle to its host cell
surface receptor ACE2,[8] and the concomitant fusion with
the cell membrane followed by the delivery of the viral load.[9]One particularly promising avenue for therapeutic intervention that currently
enjoys considerable attention is blocking the ACE2/S-protein interaction
site with either antibodies or small molecules.[10] In
particular, heparin interaction with the S-protein has been shown to induce
conformational changes within the latter[11] and to have
inhibitory effects on the cellular entry by the virus.[12]
Combined with the well-documented anticoagulant and anti-inflammatory[13] properties of heparin (that are highly relevant
vis-à-vis the two hallmarks of COVID-19, the
coagulopathy[14,15] and the cytokine storm[16]), this led to a suggestion that heparin or related
compounds may play multiple roles in both arresting the SARS-CoV-2 infection
and mitigating its consequences.[17,18] In fact, heparin treatment of
COVID-19patients has been adopted by some physicians and is associated with
a better prognosis.[19] At the same time, the use of
heparin raises the specter of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), and
its incidence was found to be particularly high among critical COVID-19patients.[20] Clearly, utilization of heparin or
related compounds as a safe and efficient treatment of coronavirus-related
pathologies will hinge upon the ability to select a subset of structures
that exhibit the desired properties (e.g., the ability to block the
ACE2/S-protein association) while lacking the deleterious effects (e.g., the
ability to create immunogenic ultralarge complexes with platelet factor 4,
the hallmark of HIT,[21] or cause excessive bleeding).
Similar sentiments can be expressed with respect to a wide range of other
medicines that are currently a focus of extensive repurposing
efforts.[3] This work can be greatly facilitated by
analytical methods capable of providing detailed information on the drug
candidates’ interactions with their therapeutic targets and their
ability to disrupt the molecular processes that are critical for the
SARS-CoV-2 lifecycle. Native mass spectrometry (MS) has been steadily
gaining popularity in the field of drug discovery,[22,23] but its
applications are frequently limited to relatively homogeneous systems.
Unfortunately, the large size and the extensive glycosylation of the
proteins involved in the SARS-CoV-2 docking to the host cell surface (14
N-glycans within the ectodomain of ACE2 and at least 18 O- and N-glycans
within the S-protein ectodomain,[24] including three in its
receptor binding domain, RBD) make the straightforward application of native
MS to study ACE2/S-protein association challenging. This problem may be
further exacerbated by the structural heterogeneity of therapeutics that are
evaluated as potential disruptors of the ACE2/S-protein association, such as
heparin and its derivatives.Several approaches have been developed in the past decade as a means of
facilitating native MS analyses of highly heterogeneous systems, which rely
on supplementing MS measurements with nondenaturing front-end separation
techniques,[25] and gas-phase chemistry (e.g.,
limited charge reduction[26]). The latter is particularly
attractive, as it allows native MS to be applied to systems as heterogeneous
as associations of proteins with unfractionated heparin.[27] In this work, we use native MS in tandem with limited charge reduction to
characterize ACE2/RBD complexes and evaluate the influence of
heparin-related compounds (a synthetic pentasaccharidefondaparinux and a
fixed-length eicosasaccharideheparin chains) on the stability of these
complexes. Above and beyond providing important mechanistic details on
attenuation of the ACE2/RBD association by heparin, the study demonstrates
the potential of native MS supplemented by limited charge reduction to
support the COVID-19-related drug repurposing efforts.
Experimental Section
The recombinant forms of humanACE2 (residues 1–740) and RBD (residues
319–541) expressed in baculovirus/insect cells systems were purchased
from Sino Biological (Wayne, PA). RBD expressed in E. coli
was purchased from RayBiotech (Peachtree Corners, GA). All proteins were
extensively dialyzed in 150 mM NH4CH3CO2
prior to MS analyses (ultrafiltration at 2000 rpm with 10 kDa MW cutoff
filters for 60 min repeated three times), although only proteins expressed
in eukaryotic cells could be recovered following purification. Fondaparinux
was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO), and heparineicosasaccharide produced by partial heparin depolymerization (dp20) was
purchased from Iduron (Alderley Edge, UK). All solvents and buffers were of
analytical grade or higher. Native MS measurements were carried out using a
Synapt G2-Si (Waters, Milford, MA) hybrid quadrupole/time-of-flight mass
spectrometer equipped with a nanospray ion source. The following ion source
parameters were used to maintain noncovalent complexes in the gas phase:
capillary voltage, 1.5 kV; sampling cone voltage, 80 V; source offset, 80 V;
trap CE, 4 V; trap DC bias, 3 V; and transfer CE, 0 V. Ion selection for
limited charge reduction was achieved by setting the appropriate quadrupole
selection parameters (LM resolution set at 4.5). Limited charge reduction
was initiated by allowing the m/z-selected
multiply charged ions to interact with 1,3-dicyanobenzene anions for 0.6 ms
after setting the trap wave height as 0.3 V and optimizing the discharge
current. All MS measurements were repeated at least twice to ensure
consistency of the results.Molecular modeling of the RBD/heparin complexes was carried out using a Maestro
(Schrödinger LLC, New York, NY) modeling suite, release 2019-4. The
ACE2/RBD model was prepared using the PDB 6M17 structure[28] as a
template. The pentasaccharide model was extracted from the PDB 4R9W structure, and dp20
model was created by deleting a tetrasaccharide from the nonreducing end of
heparin dp24 (PDB 3IRJ). The RBD/heparinoid complexes were minimized using the
OPLS3 force field. The MD simulations were set up using a neutralized system
(with 6 and 34 Na+ ions used for fondaparinux and dp20,
respectively) and run for 6 ns in explicit water and 150 mM NaCl at 300 K
under an OPLS3 force field.
Results and Discussion
Despite the modest size of the SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD), its
mass spectrum acquired under near-native conditions (Figure
A) is convoluted and difficult to
interpret. Since the main source of structural heterogeneity within this
protein is its extensive glycosylation (two N- and at least one
O-glycans[24]), we also attempted to work with RBD
expressed in E. coli (presumably glycan free). However,
this construct had poor solubility characteristics and appeared to exist as
a large aggregate, most likely due to the aberrant disulfide formation (see
Supporting Information for more details). Therefore, our
efforts were focused on using limited charge reduction[26]
to facilitate the native MS analysis of this glycoprotein expressed in
eukaryotic cells. Selection of a subpopulation of RBD ions at
m/z 3256 (the apex of the most
abundant peak) followed by their reaction with 1,3-dicyanobenzene anions
over a limited period of time results in a reduction of the extent of
multiple charging of RBD ions without fragmentation. As a result, a
well-defined charge ladder is generated that allows both z
and m values of the selected ionic population to be
determined (the cyan trace in Figure A). This procedure allowed the major ionic species
(m/z 2990–4100) to be
assigned as the RBD monomers (average MW 32.7 kDa). Similar analysis of the
minor ionic species (m/z 4200–6500)
led to their assignment as the RBD dimers with an average MW 65.5 kDa (the
blue trace in Figure A). The
latter likely reflects the presence of an unpaired cysteine residue within
the RBD segment (Cys538) capable of forming an intermolecular
disulfide bond.
Figure 1
Mass spectra of the recombinant form of the SARS-CoV-2 S-protein
RBD (10 μM aqueous solution in 150 mM
NH4CH3CO2) in the absence
of heparinoids (A) and in the presence of 15 μM
fondaparinux (B) and 15 μM fixed-length heparin oligomer
dp20 (C). The charge states of the poorly defined peaks in the
original mass spectra were assigned using limited charge
reduction of ionic populations at
m/z 3256 (cyan), 3375
(maroon), 3779 (purple), and 4358 (blue). The inset shows a
zoomed view of the ionic signals at the charge state +10 in all
three mass spectra.
Mass spectra of the recombinant form of the SARS-CoV-2S-proteinRBD (10 μM aqueous solution in 150 mM
NH4CH3CO2) in the absence
of heparinoids (A) and in the presence of 15 μM
fondaparinux (B) and 15 μM fixed-length heparin oligomer
dp20 (C). The charge states of the poorly defined peaks in the
original mass spectra were assigned using limited charge
reduction of ionic populations at
m/z 3256 (cyan), 3375
(maroon), 3779 (purple), and 4358 (blue). The inset shows a
zoomed view of the ionic signals at the charge state +10 in all
three mass spectra.Addition of a structurally homogeneous pentasaccharideheparin mimetic
(fondaparinux) to the RBD solution results in a noticeable shift of the
ionic signal in native MS (Figure B). The magnitude of this shift (1521 Da) correlates with the
ligand mass (1505 Da); importantly, only 1:1 protein/ligand complexes are
observed (in contrast to high-pI proteins, which act as heparin
“sponges” by accommodating multiple polyanionic chains[29]). Similar behavior is observed when a fixed-length
heparin oligomer (eicosasaccharide, or dp20) is added to the RBD solution
(Figure C). The magnitude of
the mass shift (5.6 kDa) corresponds to a dp20 species carrying on average
26 sulfate groups (the sulfation levels in dp20 range from 17 to 28[30]), and only 1:1 RBD/dp20 complexes are observed alongside
the less abundant free protein (inset in Figure ).The absence of the 1:2 protein/heparin oligomer complexes might seem
surprising, as the protein surface contains two distinct basic patches
(R346, R355, K356, and R357) and (R454, R457, K458, K462, and R466) that
were previously suggested to be heparin binding sites.[11]
Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the RBD/fondaparinux complex
indicates that the polyanion association with the protein results in
significant conformational changes on the surface of the latter, giving rise
to a consolidated patch of the positive charge (Figure
). While such conformational
rearrangements provide enthalpic gains for the electrostatically driven
RBD/heparin oligomer interaction, they exert deleterious effects on the
ACE2/RBD binding. Indeed, conformation of the receptor-binding motif (RBM)
of RBD following RBD association with fondaparinux undergoes significant
changes, which affect critical residues in the ACE2/RBD interface[7] (see Supporting Information for more details).
Figure 2
3kT/e electrostatic potential
(ESP) surfaces calculated for RBD associated with ACE2 (left),
fondaparinux (middle), and dp20 (right). The ACE2/RBD structure
(part of PDB 6M17(28)) shows ACE2 in a
ribbon format with an ESP-mapped molecular surface. Both
RBD/heparinoid complexes are representative structures from MD
simulations; the heparinoids are shown in a ball-and-stick
format with ESP-mapped molecular surfaces.
3kT/e electrostatic potential
(ESP) surfaces calculated for RBD associated with ACE2 (left),
fondaparinux (middle), and dp20 (right). The ACE2/RBD structure
(part of PDB 6M17(28)) shows ACE2 in a
ribbon format with an ESP-mapped molecular surface. Both
RBD/heparinoid complexes are representative structures from MD
simulations; the heparinoids are shown in a ball-and-stick
format with ESP-mapped molecular surfaces.To confirm the ability of a short heparin oligomer to disrupt the ACE2/RBD
association, mass spectra of the ACE2/RBD mixture were acquired in the
absence and in the presence of fondaparinux under near-native conditions.
Native MS of ACE2 indicates that this protein is a noncovalent dimer
(ACE22, see Supporting Information for more details), and the
reference ACE2/RBD spectrum (Figure A) features an abundant signal of the
(ACE2·RBD)2 complex in
m/z region 7500–9000 (the
mass and charge assignments for these ions were made using limited charge
reduction in a matter similar to that described earlier for the RBD and its
complexes with heparinoids) alongside the residual unbound RBD that was
present in molar excess in solution. This is consistent with the crystal
structure of the ACE2/RBD complexes, where each monomeric unit within the
(ACE2)2 dimer accommodates a single RBD
molecule.[28,31] No signal of unbound ACE2 could be detected,
consistent with the reported binding strength in the low-nM range[7] (total concentrations of both proteins in solutions used
in MS analyses were in the low-μM range (Figure ). The appearance of the mass spectrum
changes dramatically in the presence of fondaparinux (5-fold molar excess
over RBD), with the ionic signal of ACE2 monomers becoming prominent in the
m/z region 5000–6000 (Figure B). The presence of both
free RBD and ACE2 species alongside their complex suggests a dramatic
decrease in the binding affinity (which can be roughly estimated using the
solution concentrations of both binding partners,[32] i.e.,
in the μM range). The destabilizing effect exerted by the longer
heparinoid is even more significant. Indeed, the presence of dp20 in
solution resulted in the ionic signals of free RBD and the ACE2 monomer
becoming nearly equiabundant with that of their 2:2 complex; the spectrum
also reveals the presence of monomeric ACE2 associated with the RBD dimer
(Figure C).
Figure 3
Mass spectra of RBD/ACE2 solutions (5 and 2.5 μM,
respectively) in 150 mM
NH4CH3CO2 acquired in the
absence of heparinoids (A) and in the presence of fondaparinux
(B) and dp20 (C). The reference mass spectrum of ACE2 is shown
in panel A (red); the blue, pink, and purple reference spectra
in panels A, B, and C, respectively, represent RBD,
RBD/fondaparinux, and RBD/dp20. The well-defined charge ladders
in each panel show the results of the limited charge reduction
measurements that were used to assign the poorly defined ion
peaks in the original mass spectra.
Mass spectra of RBD/ACE2 solutions (5 and 2.5 μM,
respectively) in 150 mM
NH4CH3CO2 acquired in the
absence of heparinoids (A) and in the presence of fondaparinux
(B) and dp20 (C). The reference mass spectrum of ACE2 is shown
in panel A (red); the blue, pink, and purple reference spectra
in panels A, B, and C, respectively, represent RBD,
RBD/fondaparinux, and RBD/dp20. The well-defined charge ladders
in each panel show the results of the limited charge reduction
measurements that were used to assign the poorly defined ion
peaks in the original mass spectra.The importance of the heparin oligomer chain length in modulating its ability
to disrupt the ACE2/RBD interaction is likely to be related to the limited
physical size of the positive patch on the RBD surface that can accommodate
not more than six saccharide units (Figure ). The rest of the polyanionic chain is exposed to the
solvent, resulting in unfavorable interactions with the low-pI ACE2
molecules (due to the electrostatic repulsion). This results in a
synergistic effect, with the longer heparin chain destabilizing the ACE2/RBD
association via both conformational rearrangements within the former (vide
supra) and the long-range electrostatic repulsion of the latter. It should
also be noted that the ionic signal of the (ACE2·RBD)2
complex in the presence of dp20 appears to have a mass shift in excess of 3
kDa compared to the same complex observed in the absence of heparin
oligomers. It is possible that this mass shift reflects the presence of a
lower-sulfate density heparin oligomer chain associated with the ACE2-bound
RBD, with the low number of negative charges present on this
glycosaminoglycan chain being insufficient vis-à-vis inducing
unfavorable electrostatic interaction with the negatively charged ACE2. In
contrast to the long and highly sulfated heparin chains, the shorter
oligomer (fondaparinux) disrupts the ACE2/RBD interaction only via
allosteric conformational changes within the RBM segment within RBD,
exerting a somewhat weaker destabilizing effect. Taken together, the results
of native MS measurements and MD simulations provide important insights into
the mechanism of the ACE2/RBD association disruption by heparin that will be
invaluable for rational selection of the most potent inhibitors of the
SARS-CoV-2 docking to the host cell.
Conclusions
The level of structural heterogeneity displayed by both viral proteins and
their counterparts on the surfaces of the host cells (as well as some of the
proposed therapeutics, such as heparin) may seem overwhelming for the
straightforward “intact-molecule” MS measurements. However,
incorporation of the limited charge reduction in the experimental workflow
allows meaningful information to be obtained on objects as complex as 2:2
ACE2/RBD associations. While native MS cannot provide the level of
structural detail produced in crystallographic studies,[28,31] it allows the
influence of various compounds on the stability of such complexes to be
readily evaluated and mechanistic details to be revealed, thereby enabling a
rational approach to the drug repurposing efforts. While the methodology
presented in this work allows the overall effect of highly heterogeneous
heparin products on the ACE2/RBD association to be determined, complementary
MS-based methods of heparin analysis (such as the recently introduced
foot-printing[30]) will enable elucidation of
specific structural features of heparin that endow it with high RBD affinity
and/or enhanced ability to disrupt the ACE2/RBD associations. Design of
successful therapeutic strategies against a foe as formidable as SARS-CoV-2
will require mobilization of efforts and resources in the entire field of
life sciences, and analytical tools (including MS) will undoubtedly play a
pivotal role in this work.
Authors: Linh Nguyen; Kelli A McCord; Duong T Bui; Kim M Bouwman; Elena N Kitova; Mohamed Elaish; Dhanraj Kumawat; Gour C Daskhan; Ilhan Tomris; Ling Han; Pradeep Chopra; Tzu-Jing Yang; Steven D Willows; Andrew L Mason; Lara K Mahal; Todd L Lowary; Lori J West; Shang-Te Danny Hsu; Tom Hobman; Stephen M Tompkins; Geert-Jan Boons; Robert P de Vries; Matthew S Macauley; John S Klassen Journal: Nat Chem Biol Date: 2021-11-09 Impact factor: 15.040
Authors: Jonathan Douxfils; Julien Favresse; Jean-Michel Dogné; Thomas Lecompte; Sophie Susen; Charlotte Cordonnier; Aurélien Lebreton; Robert Gosselin; Pierre Sié; Gilles Pernod; Yves Gruel; Philippe Nguyen; Caroline Vayne; François Mullier Journal: Thromb Res Date: 2021-05-15 Impact factor: 3.944
Authors: Chuanxiong Nie; Paria Pouyan; Daniel Lauster; Jakob Trimpert; Yannic Kerkhoff; Gergo Peter Szekeres; Matthias Wallert; Stephan Block; Anil Kumar Sahoo; Jens Dernedde; Kevin Pagel; Benedikt B Kaufer; Roland R Netz; Matthias Ballauff; Rainer Haag Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2021-06-09 Impact factor: 16.823
Authors: Ishac Nazy; Stefan D Jevtic; Jane C Moore; Angela Huynh; James W Smith; John G Kelton; Donald M Arnold Journal: J Thromb Haemost Date: 2021-03-14 Impact factor: 16.036