Literature DB >> 32677540

Positive information facilitates response inhibition in older adults only when emotion is task-relevant.

Samantha E Williams1, Eric J Lenze2, Jill D Waring1.   

Abstract

Emotional information is integral to everyday life and impacts a variety of cognitive abilities including response inhibition, a critical skill for maintaining appropriate and flexible behaviour. However, reported effects of emotion on response inhibition are inconsistent in younger adults, and very limited in older adults. Effects of aging are especially relevant because emotion regulation improves with aging despite declining inhibitory control over neutral information. Across three studies, we assessed the impact of emotional facial expressions on response inhibition in younger and older adults while manipulating attention to task stimuli. Emotional faces (versus neutral faces) altered response inhibition only when task instructions required explicit attention to emotional attributes of the faces. When directly comparing fear faces to happy faces, both age groups had better response inhibition to happy faces. Age further influenced differences across conditions, in that happy faces enhanced response inhibition relative to neutral faces in older adults but not younger adults. Thus, emotional response inhibition for task-relevant (but not task-irrelevant) positive information is enhanced in late life compared to early adulthood. The present work extends the nascent literature on emotional response inhibition in aging, and proffers a framework to reconcile the mixed literature on this topic in younger adults.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emotion; aging; executive function; response inhibition; stop-signal task

Year:  2020        PMID: 32677540      PMCID: PMC7677201          DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2020.1793303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Emot        ISSN: 0269-9931


  46 in total

1.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  Attentional capture by emotional faces is contingent on attentional control settings.

Authors:  Daniel Barratt; Claus Bundesen
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2012-03-15

3.  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

Review 4.  Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Attentional allocation to task-irrelevant fearful faces is not automatic: experimental evidence for the conditional hypothesis of emotional selection.

Authors:  Quentin Victeur; Pascal Huguet; Laetitia Silvert
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2019-05-25

6.  Meta-analysis of the age-related positivity effect: age differences in preferences for positive over negative information.

Authors:  Andrew E Reed; Larry Chan; Joseph A Mikels
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2014-03

Review 7.  Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Putting the brakes on the brakes: negative emotion disrupts cognitive control network functioning and alters subsequent stopping ability.

Authors:  Tara K Patterson; Agatha Lenartowicz; Elliot T Berkman; Danni Ji; Russell A Poldrack; Barbara J Knowlton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Inhibitory control and trait aggression: neural and behavioral insights using the emotional stop signal task.

Authors:  Christina M Pawliczek; Birgit Derntl; Thilo Kellermann; Nils Kohn; Ruben C Gur; Ute Habel
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  A consensus guide to capturing the ability to inhibit actions and impulsive behaviors in the stop-signal task.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Adam R Aron; Guido Ph Band; Christian Beste; Patrick G Bissett; Adam T Brockett; Joshua W Brown; Samuel R Chamberlain; Christopher D Chambers; Hans Colonius; Lorenza S Colzato; Brian D Corneil; James P Coxon; Annie Dupuis; Dawn M Eagle; Hugh Garavan; Ian Greenhouse; Andrew Heathcote; René J Huster; Sara Jahfari; J Leon Kenemans; Inge Leunissen; Chiang-Shan R Li; Gordon D Logan; Dora Matzke; Sharon Morein-Zamir; Aditya Murthy; Martin Paré; Russell A Poldrack; K Richard Ridderinkhof; Trevor W Robbins; Matthew Roesch; Katya Rubia; Russell J Schachar; Jeffrey D Schall; Ann-Kathrin Stock; Nicole C Swann; Katharine N Thakkar; Maurits W van der Molen; Luc Vermeylen; Matthijs Vink; Jan R Wessel; Robert Whelan; Bram B Zandbelt; C Nico Boehler
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  4 in total

1.  A multimodal psychological, physiological and behavioural dataset for human emotions in driving tasks.

Authors:  Wenbo Li; Ruichen Tan; Yang Xing; Guofa Li; Shen Li; Guanzhong Zeng; Peizhi Wang; Bingbing Zhang; Xinyu Su; Dawei Pi; Gang Guo; Dongpu Cao
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 8.501

2.  Irrelevant positive emotional information facilitates response inhibition only under a high perceptual load.

Authors:  Shubham Pandey; Rashmi Gupta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Irrelevant angry faces impair response inhibition, and the go and stop processes share attentional resources.

Authors:  Shubham Pandey; Rashmi Gupta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Stopping in (e)motion: Reactive action inhibition when facing valence-independent emotional stimuli.

Authors:  Simone Battaglia; Pasquale Cardellicchio; Chiara Di Fazio; Claudio Nazzi; Alessio Fracasso; Sara Borgomaneri
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.617

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.