Literature DB >> 32676996

Designing Discrete Choice Experiments Using a Patient-Oriented Approach.

Magda Aguiar1, Mark Harrison2,3,4, Sarah Munro3,5, Tiasha Burch6, K Julia Kaal2,7, Marie Hudson8, Nick Bansback3,4,7, Tracey-Lea Laba9.   

Abstract

Patient-oriented research is a process whereby patients or caregivers are included as research partners so that research focusses on topics that are priorities and lead to findings that translate into practice. Using a case study of preferences for stem cell transplant in scleroderma, we report on a patient-oriented research approach to developing a discrete choice experiment. Our patient-oriented research application followed the four guiding principles in Canada's Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research: inclusiveness, support, mutual respect and co-build. In this case study, patient partners were involved at different levels of engagement to match individual availability, skillset and roles in the team. They advised, to different degrees, on all aspects of the study from design to analyses. Using a patient-oriented research approach led to the inclusion of attributes that would likely have been excluded (e.g. support from a multidisciplinary team), and realistic framing of patient-relevant and sometimes sensitive attributes (e.g. mortality and cost). Meeting locations and times were adjusted to accommodate all-team circumstances. Institutional constraints on the reimbursement for patient partners influenced the timing and extent of involvement. We found that adopting a patient-oriented research approach to discrete choice experiment design injected unique knowledge and expertise into the team, improved the representativeness of the sample recruited, minimised researcher biases, and ensured appropriate attribute selection and descriptions. The patient-oriented research approach highlighted some constraints of discrete choice experiment designs and, while not a solution, might ensure the methodological trade-offs remain patient relevant. Institutional challenges must be addressed to progress patient-oriented health economics research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32676996     DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00431-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient        ISSN: 1178-1653            Impact factor:   3.883


  3 in total

1.  Patient-provider communication about medication cost in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  K Julia Kaal; Nick Bansback; Marie Hudson; Aslam Anis; Cheryl Koehn; Mark Harrison
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Tokenism in patient engagement.

Authors:  David L Hahn; Amanda E Hoffmann; Maret Felzien; Joseph W LeMaster; Jinping Xu; Lyle J Fagnan
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.267

3.  Designing Discrete Choice Experiments Using a Patient-Oriented Approach.

Authors:  Magda Aguiar; Mark Harrison; Sarah Munro; Tiasha Burch; K Julia Kaal; Marie Hudson; Nick Bansback; Tracey-Lea Laba
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 3.883

  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  Attributes Used for Cancer Screening Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rebekah Hall; Antonieta Medina-Lara; Willie Hamilton; Anne E Spencer
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Patient Commentary: Added Value and Validity to Research Outcomes Through Thoughtful Multifaceted Patient-Oriented Research.

Authors:  Tiasha Burch
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Designing Discrete Choice Experiments Using a Patient-Oriented Approach.

Authors:  Magda Aguiar; Mark Harrison; Sarah Munro; Tiasha Burch; K Julia Kaal; Marie Hudson; Nick Bansback; Tracey-Lea Laba
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 3.883

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.