| Literature DB >> 32676824 |
J-L Diehl1,2, N Peron3, R Chocron4,5, B Debuc6, E Guerot3, C Hauw-Berlemont3, B Hermann3, J L Augy3, R Younan3, A Novara3, J Langlais3, L Khider7, N Gendron8,9, G Goudot5, J-F Fagon3, T Mirault4,10, D M Smadja8,9.
Abstract
RATIONALE: COVID-19 ARDS could differ from typical forms of the syndrome.Entities:
Keywords: ARDS; COVID-19; Physiological dead-space; Ventilatory ratio
Year: 2020 PMID: 32676824 PMCID: PMC7364286 DOI: 10.1186/s13613-020-00716-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Intensive Care ISSN: 2110-5820 Impact factor: 6.925
Respiratory and hemodynamic parameters observed early in the course of protective mechanical ventilation in 22 COVID-19 ARDS patients
| Ventilator settings | |
| | 412 [356–425] |
| RR (/min) | 33 [28.5–35] |
| PEEP (cmH2O) | 16 [15–17] |
| FiO2 (%) | 45 [40–58] |
| Respiratory mechanics | |
| | 27 [25–28] |
| PEEPtot (cmH2O) | 16.5 [16–18] |
| DP (cmH2O) | 9.5 [9–11.75] |
| Crs (mL/cmH2O) | 39.5 [33.1–44.7] |
| EELV (mL) | 2100 [1721–2434] |
| Gas exchanges | |
| PaCO2 (mmHg) | 55 [44–62] |
| PaO2/FiO2 | 198 [167–298] |
| DAaO2 (mmHg) | 136 [102–209] |
| ETCO2 (mmHg) | 38 [33–45] |
| VR | 2.9 [2.2–3.4] |
| | 75 [69–80.5] |
| VO2 (mL/min) | 280 [226–327] |
| VCO2 (mL/min) | 210 [175–222] |
| Hemodynamic support | |
| Catecholamine support | 8 (36%) |
V tidal volume, PBW predicted body weight, RR respiratory rate, P plateau pressure, PEEP total PEEP measured during a prolonged expiratory pause, DP driving pressure, Crs respiratory system compliance, EELV end-expiratory lung volume, DAaO alveolo-arterial difference in O2 partial pressures, ECO end-tidal expired CO2, VR ventilatory ratio, V/V physiological dead space, VO O2 total body uptake, VCO CO2 total body production
Fig. 1Correlations between different respiratory parameters. a Correlation between physiological dead space and ventilatory ratio in 22 COVID-19 ARDS patients studied early after intubation and initiation of protective ventilation. b Correlation between CO2 total body production and ventilatory ratio
Published reference values on VD/VT (Enghoff) and VR in non-COVID-19 ARDS patients
| First author | Year of publication | PEEP level (cmH2O) | VR | Comments | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nuckton [ | 2002 | 179 | 8.5 ± 3 | 58 ± 10 | NR | |
| Lucangelo [ | 2008 | 10 | 10 ± 3 | 54 ± 14 | NR | |
| Fengmei [ | 2012 | 12 deceased 11 survived | 6 6 | 64 ± 8 53 ± 4 | NR | Fixed PEEP level |
| Kallet [ | 2014 | 99 | 10 ± 3 | 57 ± 11 | NR | |
| Beitler [ | 2015 | 210 | 10 ± 4 | 60 ± 12 | NR | |
| Sinha [ | 2018 | 520 | 11 ± 4 | 63 ± 12 | 1.9 ± 0.6 | 28 patients with mild ARDS |
| Cogniat [ | 2018 | 14 | 16 | 69 [59-77] | NR | 7 patients with mild ARDS HME (internal volume: 40 mL) |
| Van Meenen [ | 2019 | 41 deceased 49 survived | 15 [11-16] 15 [10-16] | 43 [34-51] 27 [22-36] | NR | |
| Morales-Quintero [ | 2019 | 288 deceased 652 survived | 10 [6-13] 10 [5-12] | NR | 1.8 [1.5-2.3] 1.6 [1.4-2] | |
| Ospina Tascon [ | 2020 | 42 | 12 [10-15] | 54 [45-61] | NR | |
| Present study | 22 | 16 [15-17] | 75 [69-80.5] | 2.9 [2.2-3.4] | COVID-19 patients |
V/V physiological dead space, VR ventilatory ratio, HME heat and moisture exchange filter