BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of spectral computed tomography (CT) mono-energy imaging combined with metal artifact reduction software (MARs) for metal implant artifact reduction using a phantom. METHODS: A quantitative standard phantom with 9 cylinders was used to simulate the attenuation of the different tissues of the human body around the metal implant. Groups A and B were divided according to conventional CT scan mode and spectral CT scan mode. Three sets of reconstructed images, including 120 kVp-like + MARs images, mono-energy images (MonoE), and MonoE + MARs images, were generated after spectral CT scanning. High-attenuation artifacts and low-attenuation artifacts were observed around the coil in the images of groups A and B. The CT values (Hounsfield unit) and standard deviation (SD) values of the artifacts were measured, and the artifact index and hardening artifact removal rate were calculated. RESULTS: Compared to conventional poly-energy CT images, for high-attenuation and low-attenuation artifacts, the artifact indices of 120 kVp-like + MARs, MonoE, and MonoE + MARs images were all reduced significantly. The hardening artifact removal rates of the high-attenuation and low-attenuation artifacts of 120 kVp-like + MARs images were 82% and 92%, respectively. The hardening artifact removal rate of the high-attenuation and low-attenuation artifacts of MonoE and MonoE + MARs images increased with the mono-energy level. CONCLUSIONS: Spectral CT using the 120 kVp-like + MARs, 110-140 keV MonoE, and MonoE + MARs reconstruction methods can reduce metal implant artifacts in varying degrees. MonoE + MARs reconstruction was the best method for reducing metal artifacts. 2020 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of spectral computed tomography (CT) mono-energy imaging combined with metal artifact reduction software (MARs) for metal implant artifact reduction using a phantom. METHODS: A quantitative standard phantom with 9 cylinders was used to simulate the attenuation of the different tissues of the human body around the metal implant. Groups A and B were divided according to conventional CT scan mode and spectral CT scan mode. Three sets of reconstructed images, including 120 kVp-like + MARs images, mono-energy images (MonoE), and MonoE + MARs images, were generated after spectral CT scanning. High-attenuation artifacts and low-attenuation artifacts were observed around the coil in the images of groups A and B. The CT values (Hounsfield unit) and standard deviation (SD) values of the artifacts were measured, and the artifact index and hardening artifact removal rate were calculated. RESULTS: Compared to conventional poly-energy CT images, for high-attenuation and low-attenuation artifacts, the artifact indices of 120 kVp-like + MARs, MonoE, and MonoE + MARs images were all reduced significantly. The hardening artifact removal rates of the high-attenuation and low-attenuation artifacts of 120 kVp-like + MARs images were 82% and 92%, respectively. The hardening artifact removal rate of the high-attenuation and low-attenuation artifacts of MonoE and MonoE + MARs images increased with the mono-energy level. CONCLUSIONS: Spectral CT using the 120 kVp-like + MARs, 110-140 keV MonoE, and MonoE + MARs reconstruction methods can reduce metal implant artifacts in varying degrees. MonoE + MARs reconstruction was the best method for reducing metal artifacts. 2020 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Entities:
Keywords:
Special CT; metal artifact reduction software (MARs); metal implant artifacts; mono-energy imaging
Authors: Jessie Y Huang; James R Kerns; Jessica L Nute; Xinming Liu; Peter A Balter; Francesco C Stingo; David S Followill; Dragan Mirkovic; Rebecca M Howell; Stephen F Kry Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2015-01-14 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Nils Große Hokamp; V Neuhaus; N Abdullayev; K Laukamp; S Lennartz; A Mpotsaris; J Borggrefe Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Fabian Bamberg; Alexander Dierks; Konstantin Nikolaou; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker; Thorsten R C Johnson Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-01-20 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Benjamin Moulin; Olivier Chevallier; Gilles Abdulmalak; Maxime Luu; Marianne Latournerie; Anne Minello; Sophie Gehin; Jean-Pierre Cercueil; Marco Midulla; Romaric Loffroy Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2018-03