Literature DB >> 32675156

What's in a name: How do junior doctors address their consultants?

Alice Graham1, Ben Messer2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Evidence has suggested that when senior doctors are less approachable, junior staff are less likely to raise safety issues. There are limited existing data on whether the name by which junior doctors address their seniors reflects approachability and if this varies between grade and specialties.
METHODS: An online survey was conducted in a large teaching hospital. Respondents were asked about their use of first names when addressing consultants and whether they felt this reflected their perceptions of the consultants' approachability.
RESULTS: Four-hundred and twenty-three responses were received from a cohort of approximately 800 junior doctors. Of these, 410 were included in this analysis. Respondents came from 57 different subspecialties and all years of training. Overall, junior doctors addressed 43% of consultants by their first name; 71% of junior doctors perceived these consultants to be more approachable. There were significant differences in the results between grades and specialty of junior doctor.
CONCLUSION: Throughout all specialties, the majority of junior doctors consider the consultants that they address informally to be more approachable. © Royal College of Physicians 2020. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Medical education; junior doctors; trainee satisfaction; training; wellbeing

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32675156      PMCID: PMC7385755          DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2019-0301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)        ISSN: 1470-2118            Impact factor:   2.659


  8 in total

1.  Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: cross sectional surveys.

Authors:  J B Sexton; E J Thomas; R L Helmreich
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-18

2.  Hierarchies: the Berlin Wall of patient safety.

Authors:  M M Walton
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-08

3.  A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population.

Authors:  Alex B Haynes; Thomas G Weiser; William R Berry; Stuart R Lipsitz; Abdel-Hadi S Breizat; E Patchen Dellinger; Teodoro Herbosa; Sudhir Joseph; Pascience L Kibatala; Marie Carmela M Lapitan; Alan F Merry; Krishna Moorthy; Richard K Reznick; Bryce Taylor; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Counterheroism, common knowledge, and ergonomics: concepts from aviation that could improve patient safety.

Authors:  Geraint H Lewis; Rhema Vaithianathan; Peter M Hockey; Guy Hirst; James P Bagian
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Mad as a hatter? Evaluating doctors' recall of names in theatres and attitudes towards adopting #theatrecapchallenge.

Authors:  Z A Burton; F Guerreiro; M Turner; R Hackett
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  On first name terms.

Authors:  Oliver Ellis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-03-06

7.  Key High-efficiency Practices of Emergency Department Providers: A Mixed-methods Study.

Authors:  Morgan R Bobb; Azeemuddin Ahmed; Paul Van Heukelom; Rachel Tranter; Karisa K Harland; Brady M Firth; Randy Fry; Katherine Schneider; Kathryn K Dierks; Sarah L Miller; Nicholas M Mohr
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  Aviation and healthcare: a comparative review with implications for patient safety.

Authors:  Narinder Kapur; Anam Parand; Tayana Soukup; Tom Reader; Nick Sevdalis
Journal:  JRSM Open       Date:  2015-12-02
  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  What's in a name?

Authors:  Avinash Aujayeb
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.659

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.