Literature DB >> 32674931

Year 1: Experiences of a tertiary cancer centre following implementation of reflex BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumor testing for all high-grade serous ovarian cancers in a universal healthcare system.

Jeanna M McCuaig1, Melanie Care2, Sarah E Ferguson3, Raymond H Kim4, Tracy L Stockley5, Kelly A Metcalfe6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study compares the rate and time to genetic referral, and patient uptake of germline genetic services, before and after implementation of reflex BRCA1/2 tumor testing for high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) in a universal healthcare system.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review of HSGOC patients diagnosed in the year before (PRE) and after (POST) implementation of reflex BRCA1/2 tumor testing was conducted. Clinical information (date/age at diagnosis, personal/family history of breast/ovarian cancer, cancer stage, primary treatment, tumor results) and dates of genetics referral, counseling, and germline testing were obtained. Incident rate ratios (IRR) and 95% CI were calculated using negative binomial regression. Time to referral was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Fisher Exact tests were used to evaluate uptake of genetic services.
RESULTS: 175 HGSOC patients were identified (81 PRE; 94 POST). Post-implementation of tumor testing, there was a higher rate of genetics referral (12.88 versus 7.10/1000 person-days; IRR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.07-2.42) and a shorter median time from diagnosis to referral (59 days PRE, 33 days POST; p = .04). In the POST cohort, most patients were referred prior to receiving their tumor results (n = 63/77; 81.8%). Once referred, most patients attended genetic counseling (94.5% PRE, 97.6% POST; p = .418) and pursue germline testing (98.6% PRE; 100% POST; p = .455).
CONCLUSIONS: Following implementation of reflex BRCA1/2 tumor testing for HGSOC, significant improvements to the rate and time to genetics referral were identified. Additional studies are needed to evaluate physician referral practices and the long-term impact of reflex tumor testing.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA; Genetic counseling; Genetic testing; Ovarian cancer; Service delivery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32674931     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.06.507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  8 in total

1.  Healthcare professionals' perspectives on implementation of universal tumor DNA testing in ovarian cancer patients: multidisciplinary focus groups.

Authors:  Margreet G E M Ausems; Joanne A de Hullu; Vera M Witjes; Jozé C C Braspenning; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Yvonne H C M Smolders; Dorien M A Hermkens; Marian J E Mourits; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Leveraging an Informatics Approach to Identify an Unmet Clinical Need for BRCA1/2 Testing Among Patients With Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Stacy W Gray; Rebecca A Ottesen; Madeline Currey; Mihaela Cristea; Janet Nikowitz; Susan Shehayeb; Vanessa Lozano; Julie Hom; Julie Kilburn; Lisa N Lopez; Sam Wing; Ernesto Sosa; Jenny Shen; Michael Morris; Bedros Dilsizian; Thomas Joseph; James Shen; Camille Adeimy; Tanyanika Phillips; Bahareh Bahadini; Joyce C Niland
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2022-09

Review 3.  Implementation of preventive and predictive BRCA testing in patients with breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer: a position paper of Italian Scientific Societies.

Authors:  A Russo; L Incorvaia; E Capoluongo; P Tagliaferri; S Gori; L Cortesi; M Genuardi; D Turchetti; U De Giorgi; M Di Maio; M Barberis; M Dessena; M Del Re; A Lapini; C Luchini; B A Jereczek-Fossa; A Sapino; S Cinieri
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2022-05-19

4.  Achieving universal genetic assessment for women with ovarian cancer: Are we there yet? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jenny Lin; Ravi N Sharaf; Rachel Saganty; Danyal Ahsan; Julia Feit; Andrea Khoury; Hannah Bergeron; Eloise Chapman-Davis; Evelyn Cantillo; Kevin Holcomb; Stephanie V Blank; Ying Liu; Charlene Thomas; Paul J Christos; Drew N Wright; Steven Lipkin; Kenneth Offit; Melissa K Frey
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  Universal genetic assessment for women with ovarian cancer not yet achieved: The promises of universal tumor DNA testing.

Authors:  Vera M Witjes; Janet R Vos; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-06-30

Review 6.  Analyzing Precision Medicine Utilization with Real-World Data: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Michael P Douglas; Anika Kumar
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-04-01

7.  Examining the Diagnostic Yield of Tumour Testing and Qualifying Germline Concordance for Hereditary Cancer Variants in Patients with High-Grade Serous Carcinoma.

Authors:  Emily A Goebel; Jennifer Kerkhof; Oleksandra Dzyubak; C Meg McLachlin; Jacob McGee; Bekim Sadikovic
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 4.141

8.  Tumour Versus Germline BRCA Testing in Ovarian Cancer: A Single-Site Institution Experience in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Iolia Akaev; Siavash Rahimi; Olubukola Onifade; Francis John Edward Gardner; David Castells-Rufas; Eleanor Jones; Shyamika Acharige; Chit Cheng Yeoh
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.