Literature DB >> 32672822

Toxic Metal-Containing Particles in Aerosols from Pod-Type Electronic Cigarettes.

R Steven Pappas1, Naudia Gray1, Mary Halstead2, Liza Valentin-Blasini1, Clifford Watson1.   

Abstract

The popularity of electronic cigarettes (electronic nicotine delivery systems or ENDS) has grown rapidly over the past decade. With the continued evolution of ENDS, and the arrival of newer replaceable pod devices on the market, it is prudent to examine their emissions to help determine potential health risks to the user. Metal-containing particles were examined in aerosol from several pod-based devices from three manufacturers that offer flavored liquids in their respective products. Previous ENDS metal emissions studies focused on the total toxic metal concentrations in aerosols and have suggested that the principal sources are oxidized internal metal components that are in contact with the liquid. Most metal oxides have limited solubility, and it is likely that some metal content in ENDS aerosol may present as particles rather than dissolved forms. Examining the composition and number of particles in the ENDS aerosols is important because inhaled metal oxide particles cause pulmonary inflammation. Chronic inhalation of ENDS aerosol may lead to inflammatory cell activation in the lungs. Therefore, this study was designed to measure metal oxide particle concentrations and sizes in ENDS aerosols from select pod-based systems. Aerosol samples were generated with pod liquids (tobacco, mint or menthol) from devices produced by three manufacturers using CORESTA Recommended Method 81 parameters with a high-purity fluoropolymer aerosol trap. Particle sizes for chromium, iron, nickel, copper, zinc, tin and lead oxides were measured in triplicate using single particle inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry and dynamic light scattering. A novel aspect of these measurements included using dual element particle analysis to infer particle source component material. Particle concentrations in aerosols from the devices were variable between devices and from pod to pod, ranging from no detectable chromium- and zinc-containing particles in aerosol from some pods to 222,000 lead containing particles per 10 puffs from individual pods. Published by Oxford University Press 2020.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 32672822      PMCID: PMC7839233          DOI: 10.1093/jat/bkaa088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anal Toxicol        ISSN: 0146-4760            Impact factor:   3.367


  14 in total

1.  Determining transport efficiency for the purpose of counting and sizing nanoparticles via single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Heather E Pace; Nicola J Rogers; Chad Jarolimek; Victoria A Coleman; Christopher P Higgins; James F Ranville
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  CSP deposition to the alveolar region of the lung: implications of cigarette design.

Authors:  Stephanie Gower; David Hammond
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  Stability of metal oxide nanoparticles in aqueous solutions.

Authors:  Chih-ping Tso; Cheng-min Zhung; Yang-hsin Shih; Young-Ming Tseng; Shian-chee Wu; Ruey-an Doong
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.915

4.  Stainless steel leaches nickel and chromium into foods during cooking.

Authors:  Kristin L Kamerud; Kevin A Hobbie; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 5.279

5.  Analysis of Toxic Metals in Electronic Cigarette Aerosols Using a Novel Trap Design.

Authors:  Mary Halstead; Naudia Gray; Nathalie Gonzalez-Jimenez; Mark Fresquez; Liza Valentin-Blasini; Clifford Watson; R Steven Pappas
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2020-03-07       Impact factor: 3.367

6.  Toxic metal concentrations in mainstream smoke from cigarettes available in the USA.

Authors:  R Steven Pappas; Mark R Fresquez; Naudia Martone; Clifford H Watson
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2014-02-16       Impact factor: 3.367

7.  Are metals emitted from electronic cigarettes a reason for health concern? A risk-assessment analysis of currently available literature.

Authors:  Konstantinos E Farsalinos; Vassilis Voudris; Konstantinos Poulas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Tobacco use among middle and high school students - United States, 2011-2014.

Authors:  René A Arrazola; Tushar Singh; Catherine G Corey; Corinne G Husten; Linda J Neff; Benjamin J Apelberg; Rebecca E Bunnell; Conrad J Choiniere; Brian A King; Shanna Cox; Tim McAfee; Ralph S Caraballo
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 17.586

9.  Elements including metals in the atomizer and aerosol of disposable electronic cigarettes and electronic hookahs.

Authors:  Monique Williams; Krassimir Bozhilov; Sanjay Ghai; Prue Talbot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Vital Signs: Tobacco Product Use Among Middle and High School Students - United States, 2011-2018.

Authors:  Andrea S Gentzke; MeLisa Creamer; Karen A Cullen; Bridget K Ambrose; Gordon Willis; Ahmed Jamal; Brian A King
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  The Effects of E-Cigarette Aerosol on Oral Cavity Cells and Tissues: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Paweł Szumilas; Aleksandra Wilk; Kamila Szumilas; Beata Karakiewicz
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-02-06

2.  Passive exposure to e-cigarette emissions is associated with worsened mental health.

Authors:  Kayla Rae Farrell; Michael Weitzman; Emma Karey; Teresa K Y Lai; Terry Gordon; Shu Xu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 4.135

3.  Toxic Metals in Liquid and Aerosol from Pod-Type Electronic Cigarettes.

Authors:  Naudia Gray; Mary Halstead; Liza Valentin-Blasini; Clifford Watson; R Steven Pappas
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 3.220

Review 4.  Analytical methods for the identification of micro/nano metals in e-cigarette emission samples: a review.

Authors:  Wafaa Waleed Al-Qaysi; Fatma H Abdulla
Journal:  Chem Zvesti       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Transfer of Metals to the Aerosol Generated by an Electronic Cigarette: Influence of Number of Puffs and Power.

Authors:  Brian Rastian; Chase Wilbur; Daniel B Curtis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 6.  A Critical Review of Recent Literature on Metal Contents in E-Cigarette Aerosol.

Authors:  Sebastien Soulet; Roberto A Sussman
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-08-29

7.  The Impact of the Storage Conditions and Type of Clearomizers on the Increase of Heavy Metal Levels in Electronic Cigarette Liquids Retailed in Romania.

Authors:  Alexandra Jităreanu; Irina Gabriela Cara; Alexandru Sava; Ioana Mârțu; Ioana-Cezara Caba; Luminița Agoroaei
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-03-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.