Literature DB >> 32672802

Assessment of Pharmacologic Ingredients in Common Over-the-Counter Sinonasal Medications.

Edward D McCoul1,2.   

Abstract

Importance: Sinonasal remedies are the most frequently purchased category of over-the-counter (OTC) drugs in the United States. A variety of options for relief are available under proprietary names, although the actual number of available options may not be readily appreciated by the consumer or the clinician. Objective: To determine the prevalence of specific ingredients in OTC sinonasal products. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study took physical inventory of brand-name and generic OTC drugs marketed as sinus, cold, allergy, or nasal remedies. Retail pharmacies in New Orleans, Louisiana, commercial websites, and the Drugs, Herbs and Supplements section of MedlinePlus and drugs.com were searched. Data were collected and analyzed from July 1 to 31, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Frequency of active ingredients in OTC formulations.
Results: Five pharmacies were visited to identify 18 brands, for which the commercial websites were then searched. The 14 most common brands represented 211 unique products. Only 8 unique nonanalgesic ingredients were identified among these products, with many products sold under the same brand name and with the same active ingredient. Phenylephrine hydrochloride, dextromethorphan hydrobromide, pseudoephedrine hydrochloride, guaifenesin, chlorpheniramine maleate, brompheniramine maleate, diphenhydramine hydrochloride, and doxylamine succinate were the common active ingredients, with all available OTC sinonasal remedies consisting of 1 or more of these ingredients. The frequency of occurrence of each ingredient ranged from 10 to 261 different products. Combinations of 2, 3, or 4 active ingredients occurred frequently in OTC sinonasal products. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that proliferation of brand extension products under a common name is pervasive. Clinicians should be aware of the large array of redundant OTC formulations and lack of specificity when discussing brand-name sinonasal remedies with their patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32672802      PMCID: PMC7366276          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.1836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   6.223


  8 in total

1.  OTC cold, cough and allergy products: more choice or more confusion?

Authors:  M Agrawal
Journal:  J Hosp Mark       Date:  1999

2.  Direct-to-Consumer Pharmaceutical Advertising: Therapeutic or Toxic?

Authors:  C Lee Ventola
Journal:  P T       Date:  2011-10

3.  Direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising and the public.

Authors:  R A Bell; R L Kravitz; M S Wilkes
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Changing the status of drugs from prescription to over-the-counter availability.

Authors:  E P Brass
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-09-13       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Differences in the Intended Meaning of Congestion Between Patients and Clinicians.

Authors:  Edward D McCoul; Alaa E Mohammed; Peter M Debbaneh; Maria Carratola; Amit S Patel
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 6.223

6.  Nonprescription medications for respiratory symptoms: Facts and marketing fictions.

Authors:  Miles Weinberger; Leslie Hendeles
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Proc       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.587

7.  Difference between patients' and doctors' interpretation of some common medical terms.

Authors:  C M Boyle
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1970-05-02

8.  Direct-To-Consumer Advertising of Over-the-Counter Sinonasal Remedies: A History of Mixed Messages.

Authors:  Edward D McCoul
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 3.325

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Efficacy and Safety of Ganduqing Granules in Treating the Common Cold: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Yilan Wang; Piao Zhou; Yuxiao Wu; Huaqin Cao; Wenfeng Hao; Fei Wang; Jing Guo
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 2.650

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.