| Literature DB >> 35722165 |
Yilan Wang1, Piao Zhou1, Yuxiao Wu1, Huaqin Cao2, Wenfeng Hao1, Fei Wang1, Jing Guo1.
Abstract
Background: There is no clear evidence-based medicine that points to the most effective drug treatments for the common cold. In view of its ability to relieve symptoms and shorten the disease course, as well as its minimal side effects, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has been widely used to treat the common cold. However, there is a lack of strong evidence to support the clinical efficacy of TCM. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ganduqing granules in the treatment of the common cold based on the network pharmacology analysis.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35722165 PMCID: PMC9203204 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5105503
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.650
Agents used in Western medicine to treat the common cold.
| Type of treatment | Therapeutic agent |
|---|---|
| Antipyretic analgesics [ | Acetaminophen [ |
| Antihistamines [ | Chlorpheniramine maleate [ |
| Decongestants [ | Pseudoephedrine [ |
| Antitussives | Ipratropium bromide [ |
| Expectorants | Bromhexine [ |
| Trace elements | Zinc [ |
| Others | Probiotics [ |
Multitarget mechanisms underlying pharmacological effects of Ganduqing granule components.
| Chinese name | Latin name | Amount (g) | Pharmacological effects relevant to the common cold |
|---|---|---|---|
| Huangqi | Radix Astragali | 20 | Anti-inflammatory [ |
| Shegan | Rhizoma Belamcandae | 10 | Anti-inflammatory [ |
Figure 1Network pharmacology of Ganduqing for the treatment of common cold. (a) Venn diagram shows intersection of gene sets. (b) The protein-protein interaction (PPI) network. (c) The drug-target-disease network. (d) The Gene Ontology (GO) analysis results. (e) The KEGG pathway analysis results.
Figure 2Flowchart of the study.
The baseline characteristics of participants.
| Group | Intervention group ( | Placebo group ( |
|---|---|---|
| Male (%) | 23 (74%) | 21 (72%) |
| Female (%) | 8 (26%) | 8 (28%) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.96 ± 3.096 | 21.85 ± 3.052 |
| Age (year) | 40.39 ± 17.16 | 37.69 ± 16.24 |
| Height (cm) | 163 ± 6.723 | 163.5 ± 6.780 |
| Weight (kg) | 61.05 ± 8.83 | 58.51 ± 9.542 |
| Body temperature (°C) | 37.34 ± 0.7051 | 37.49 ± 0.7040 |
| Breath (/min) | 17.16 ± 3.551 | 16.93 ± 2.975 |
| Heart rate (/min) | 81 ± 12.02 | 78.62 ± 9.796 |
| Diastolic pressure (mmHg) | 78.48 ± 9.825 | 79.86 ± 10.89 |
| Systolic pressure (mmHg) | 114 ± 13.43 | 110.7 ± 22.18 |
| Time from onset to enrollment ( | 35.61 ± 9.025 | 33 ± 11.62 |
| IL-6 | 15.69 ± 30.64 | 14.85 ± 10.42 |
| TNF- | 156.5 ± 118.0 | 153.3 ± 120 |
| SOD | 73.45 ± 89.64 | 68.79 ± 46.76 |
| MDA | 20.13 ± 20.36 | 19.56 ± 13.40 |
| TCM syndrome score | 20.65 ± 6.243 | 25.41 ± 7.023 |
The time to clearance of all symptoms (h).
| Group | Time to clearance of all symptoms (mean ± SD) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group ( | 46.06 ± 14.23 | <0.0001 |
| Placebo group ( | 78.62 ± 28.07 |
Levels of IL-6, TNF-α, SOD, and MDA in the peripheral blood.
| Indicators | Group | Means ± standard deviation (the difference between the values measured before and after treatment) | Least squares mean (the difference between the values measured before and after treatment) and 95% CI |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| IL-6 | Intervention group | 12.62 ± 30.04 | 6.88 (2.00–11.77) | 2.83 | 0.007 |
| Placebo group | 4.02 ± 10.20 | ||||
|
| |||||
| TNF- | Intervention group | 134.35 ± 100.59 | 7.85 (2.10–17.81) | 1.58 | 0.120 |
| Placebo group | 126.23 ± 104.11 | ||||
|
| |||||
| SOD | Intervention group | 36.18 ± 55.49 | 26.14 (2.14–50.14) | 2.19 | 0.033 |
| Placebo group | 11.68 ± 30.33 | ||||
|
| |||||
| MDA | Intervention group | 6.12 ± 16.19 | 3.51 (2.53–9.55) | 1.17 | 0.248 |
| Placebo group | 4.28 ± 9.13 | ||||
Figure 3Statistical chart of the time to disappearance of primary symptoms and secondary symptoms. Graphs represent mean ± SD. P < 0.05 and P < 0.0001 compared with the intervention group.
The clinical symptom remission rate.
| Group | Number of all symptom remission cases | Number of symptom nonremission cases | Clinical symptom remission rate (%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | 31 | 0 | 100 | 0.0157 |
| Placebo group | 25 | 4 | 82.7 |
Change in TCM syndrome score.
| Indicators | Group | Means ± standard deviation (the difference between the values measured before and after treatment) | Least squares mean (the difference between the values measured before and after treatment) and 95% CI |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| TCM syndrome score | Intervention group | 24.55 ± 5.23 | 0.87 (0.04–1.70) | 2.11 | 0.040 |
| Placebo group | 24.14 ± 5.70 | ||||