Edward Lim1, Gerald Humphris1,2. 1. Medical School, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK. 2. Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fears of cancer recurrence (FCR) is one of the most prevalent concerns and a common unmet need reported by cancer patients. Patient age is a demographic variable that has been linked to FCR, among others. Although it is recognised by researchers that age and FCR may be negatively correlated, the strength of this correlation has yet to be established. AIM: The aims of this study were to (a) conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the overall association of patient age in years with FCR across studies from 2009 to February 2019 and (b) scrutinise for patterns of these effect sizes across studies. METHODS AND RESULTS: Peer-reviewed papers were gathered from the literature via online databases (PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO). Systematic review guidelines including a quality assessment were applied to the 31 selected studies (pooled participant N size = 19 777). The meta-analysis demonstrated a significant negative association between age and FCR (ES = -0.12; 95% CI, -0.17, -0.07). Meta-regression revealed the association of patient age and FCR significantly reduced over the last decade. A significant effect (β = -0.17, P = 0.005) of breast cancer versus other cancers on this age by FCR association was also identified. CONCLUSION: The reliable and readily accessible personal information of age of patient can be utilised as a weak indicator of FCR level especially in the breast cancer field, where the majority of studies were drawn. The suggestion that age and FCR association may be attenuated in recent years requires confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Fears of cancer recurrence (FCR) is one of the most prevalent concerns and a common unmet need reported by cancerpatients. Patient age is a demographic variable that has been linked to FCR, among others. Although it is recognised by researchers that age and FCR may be negatively correlated, the strength of this correlation has yet to be established. AIM: The aims of this study were to (a) conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the overall association of patient age in years with FCR across studies from 2009 to February 2019 and (b) scrutinise for patterns of these effect sizes across studies. METHODS AND RESULTS: Peer-reviewed papers were gathered from the literature via online databases (PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO). Systematic review guidelines including a quality assessment were applied to the 31 selected studies (pooled participant N size = 19 777). The meta-analysis demonstrated a significant negative association between age and FCR (ES = -0.12; 95% CI, -0.17, -0.07). Meta-regression revealed the association of patient age and FCR significantly reduced over the last decade. A significant effect (β = -0.17, P = 0.005) of breast cancer versus other cancers on this age by FCR association was also identified. CONCLUSION: The reliable and readily accessible personal information of age of patient can be utilised as a weak indicator of FCR level especially in the breast cancer field, where the majority of studies were drawn. The suggestion that age and FCR association may be attenuated in recent years requires confirmation.
Authors: Mbathio Dieng; Phyllis N Butow; Daniel S J Costa; Rachael L Morton; Scott W Menzies; Shab Mireskandari; Stephanie Tesson; Graham J Mann; Anne E Cust; Nadine A Kasparian Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-10-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kim Wagler Ziner; George W Sledge; Cynthia J Bell; Shelley Johns; Kathy D Miller; Victoria L Champion Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: José A E Custers; Sanne W van den Berg; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Eveline M A Bleiker; Marieke F M Gielissen; Judith B Prins Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2014 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.592
Authors: Sara Macdonald; Yvonne Cunningham; Chris Patterson; Katie Robb; Una Macleod; Thomas Anker; Shona Hilton Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-04-26 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Yvonne L Luigjes-Huizer; Nina M Tauber; Gerry Humphris; Nadine A Kasparian; Wendy W T Lam; Sophie Lebel; Sébastien Simard; Allan Ben Smith; Robert Zachariae; Yati Afiyanti; Katy J L Bell; José A E Custers; Niek J de Wit; Peter L Fisher; Jacqueline Galica; Sheila N Garland; Charles W Helsper; Mette M Jeppesen; Jianlin Liu; Roxana Mititelu; Evelyn M Monninkhof; Lahiru Russell; Josée Savard; Anne E M Speckens; Sanne J van Helmondt; Sina Vatandoust; Nicholas Zdenkowski; Marije L van der Lee Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2022-04-07 Impact factor: 3.955