Literature DB >> 3267156

Ionic basis of receptor potential of frog taste cells induced by acid stimuli.

T Miyamoto1, Y Okada, T Sato.   

Abstract

1. The ionic mechanism underlying the receptor potential in frog taste cells induced by acid stimuli was studied with single microelectrodes by replacing superficial and interstitial fluids of the tongue with modified saline solutions. 2. The removal of Na+, Ca2+ and Cl- from the normal interstitial fluid did not affect the receptor potential induced by acid stimuli. Interstitial 100 mM-K+ saline did not affect the acid response. 3. The receptor potential was reduced greatly when Ca2+ was removed from the superficial saline, but was increased when the Ca2+ concentration was elevated. The removal of superficial Cl- did not affect the receptor potential. The receptor potential elicited by superficial Ca2+-free saline was partly due to Na+. Li+, K+, NH4+ or choline + substituted for Na+ in producing the receptor potential. The amiloride-sensitive Na+ channel on the receptor membrane did not contribute to the receptor potential. With pure water adaptation of the tongue surface, the mean magnitude of the acid response was 35% of the control. 4. The receptor potential was unaffected by superficial tetrodotoxin (TTX) but was blocked by superficial Ca2+ antagonists such as Co2+ and Cd2+. Sr2+ substituted for Ca2+ in generating the receptor potential. 5. The receptor potentials observed under various concentrations of superficial Ca2+ became smaller when Na+ was present in the superficial fluid, indicating a competition between Ca2+ and Na+. 6. It is concluded that a large portion of the receptor potential induced by acid stimuli is produced by cations passing through a tastant-gated Ca2+ channel on the taste receptor membrane. Both divalent (Ca2+, Sr2+) and monovalent (Na+, Li+, K+, NH4+, choline+) cations can pass through the Ca2+ channel. The other mechanism responsible for the remaining part of the receptor potential is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3267156      PMCID: PMC1190999          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  18 in total

1.  Role of anions and cations in frog taste cell stimulation.

Authors:  N Akaike; M Sato
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol       Date:  1976

2.  Contribution of the receptor and basolateral membranes to the resting potential of a frog taste cell.

Authors:  Y Okada; T Miyamoto; T Sato
Journal:  Jpn J Physiol       Date:  1986

Review 3.  Calcium channel.

Authors:  S Hagiwara; L Byerly
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 4.  Recent advances in the physiology of taste cells.

Authors:  T Sato
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 11.685

5.  Intracellular characteristics and responses of taste bud and lingual cells of the mudpuppy.

Authors:  C H West; R A Bernard
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 4.086

6.  Electrical responses to frog taste cells to chemical stimuli.

Authors:  N Akaike; A Noma; M Sato
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Ionic mechanism of generation of receptor potential in response to quinine in frog taste cell.

Authors:  Y Okada; T Miyamoto; T Sato
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1988-05-31       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Arterial perfusion of frog tongue for intracellular recording of taste cell receptor potential.

Authors:  Y Okada; T Miyamoto; T Sato
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol       Date:  1985

Review 9.  Membrane resistance change of the frog taste cells in response to water and Nacl.

Authors:  T Sato; L M Beidler
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  Conductance change associated with receptor potentials of gustatory cells in rat.

Authors:  M Ozeki
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Perspectives of taste reception.

Authors:  P Avenet; B Lindemann
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 1.843

2.  Differential distribution of two Ca(2+)-dependent and -independent K+ channels throughout receptive and basolateral membranes of bullfrog taste cells.

Authors:  R Fujiyama; T Miyamoto; T Sato
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.657

3.  Interaction between gustatory depolarizing receptor potential and efferent-induced slow depolarizing synaptic potential in frog taste cell.

Authors:  Toshihide Sato; Kazuhisa Nishishita; Yukio Okada; Kazuo Toda
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 5.046

4.  Enhancement of Gustatory Neural Responses by Parasympathetic Nerve in the Frog.

Authors:  Toshihide Sato; Yukio Okada
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 5.046

Review 5.  Sensing Senses: Optical Biosensors to Study Gustation.

Authors:  Elena von Molitor; Katja Riedel; Mathias Hafner; Rüdiger Rudolf; Tiziana Cesetti
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.