Angélique Brunot1, Jean-Jacques Grob2, Geraldine Jeudy3, Florent Grange4, Bernard Guillot5, Nora Kramkimel6, Laurent Mortier7, Yannick Le Corre8, François F Aubin9, Sandrine Mansard10, Céleste Lebbé11, Astrid Blom12, Henri Montaudie13, Damien Giacchero14, Sorilla Prey15, Delphine Legoupil16, Alexis Guyot17, Mona Amini-Adle18, Florence Granel-Brocard19, Nicolas Meyer20, Monica Dinulescu21, Julien Edeline1, Boris Campillo-Gimenez1, Thierry Lesimple1. 1. Department of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France. 2. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Marseille, France. 3. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Dijon, France. 4. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Reims, France. 5. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Montpellier, France. 6. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, APHP Cochin, France. 7. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Lille, France. 8. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Angers, France. 9. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Besancon, France. 10. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France. 11. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Assistance Publique Hopitaux Parsiens, Saint-Louis, France. 12. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, A. Paré Hospital, France. 13. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Nice, France. 14. Department of Dermatology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Lacassagne, Nice, France. 15. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Bordeaux, France. 16. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Brest, France. 17. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Avicenne, France. 18. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Lyon, France. 19. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Nancy, France. 20. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Toulouse, France. 21. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Abstract
Importance: Since 2011, many patients with metastatic melanoma have been treated with ipilimumab therapy and have developed severe immune-related adverse events (AEs). Because several immune therapies are now available to treat metastatic melanoma, a better knowledge of mechanisms and recurrence risks of immune-related AEs is needed before reintroduction of immunotherapies. Objectives: To evaluate the risk of a recurrence of immune toxic effects associated with anti-programmed cell death 1 antibody (anti-PD-1) therapy after discontinuation of ipilimumab monotherapy because of severe AEs. Design, Settings, and Participants: This cohort study conducted at 19 French melanoma referral centers included patients with metastatic melanoma who experienced severe immune-related AEs after ipilimumab therapy and then were treated with anti-PD-1 therapy between February 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016. The study cutoff was June 1, 2017. Statistical analysis was performed from June 1, 2016, to August 31, 2017. Exposures: Monotherapy with at least 1 cycle of ipilimumab that was associated with a grade 3 or 4 immune-related AE and subsequent treatment with at least 1 cycle of an anti-PD-1 (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the rate of immune-related AEs associated with anti-PD-1 therapy. Secondary outcomes were characteristics of ipilimumab-related and anti-PD-1 immune-related AEs and overall response rate and overall survival associated with anti-PD-1 therapy. Results: Of 56 patients with metastatic melanoma included in the study, all of whom experienced severe immune-related AEs after ipilimumab therapy (31 [55%] male; mean [SD] age, 64 [14.9] years), 20 (36%) experienced at least 1 immune-related AE associated with pembrolizumab (6 of 20 [30%]) or nivolumab (14 of 20 [70%]) therapy. A total of 12 patients (21%) experienced grade 3 or 4 immune-related AEs, and among these patients, 4 (33%) presented with the same immune-related AE as with ipilimumab therapy. Severe immune-related AEs were resolved with use of systemic corticosteroids (7 [58%]) and/or anti-tumor necrosis factor (1 [8%]), and no grade 5 toxic effects were reported. Five patients discontinued anti-PD-1 therapy because of immune-related AEs. The overall response rate was 43%, with a median overall survival of 21 months (interquartile range, 18 to ongoing). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that anti-PD-1 therapy may be associated with reduced risk of toxic effects and improved survival among patients who have experienced severe toxic effects after ipilimumab therapy.
Importance: Since 2011, many patients with metastatic melanoma have been treated with ipilimumab therapy and have developed severe immune-related adverse events (AEs). Because several immune therapies are now available to treat metastatic melanoma, a better knowledge of mechanisms and recurrence risks of immune-related AEs is needed before reintroduction of immunotherapies. Objectives: To evaluate the risk of a recurrence of immune toxic effects associated with anti-programmed cell death 1 antibody (anti-PD-1) therapy after discontinuation of ipilimumab monotherapy because of severe AEs. Design, Settings, and Participants: This cohort study conducted at 19 French melanoma referral centers included patients with metastatic melanoma who experienced severe immune-related AEs after ipilimumab therapy and then were treated with anti-PD-1 therapy between February 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016. The study cutoff was June 1, 2017. Statistical analysis was performed from June 1, 2016, to August 31, 2017. Exposures: Monotherapy with at least 1 cycle of ipilimumab that was associated with a grade 3 or 4 immune-related AE and subsequent treatment with at least 1 cycle of an anti-PD-1 (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the rate of immune-related AEs associated with anti-PD-1 therapy. Secondary outcomes were characteristics of ipilimumab-related and anti-PD-1 immune-related AEs and overall response rate and overall survival associated with anti-PD-1 therapy. Results: Of 56 patients with metastatic melanoma included in the study, all of whom experienced severe immune-related AEs after ipilimumab therapy (31 [55%] male; mean [SD] age, 64 [14.9] years), 20 (36%) experienced at least 1 immune-related AE associated with pembrolizumab (6 of 20 [30%]) or nivolumab (14 of 20 [70%]) therapy. A total of 12 patients (21%) experienced grade 3 or 4 immune-related AEs, and among these patients, 4 (33%) presented with the same immune-related AE as with ipilimumab therapy. Severe immune-related AEs were resolved with use of systemic corticosteroids (7 [58%]) and/or anti-tumor necrosis factor (1 [8%]), and no grade 5 toxic effects were reported. Five patients discontinued anti-PD-1 therapy because of immune-related AEs. The overall response rate was 43%, with a median overall survival of 21 months (interquartile range, 18 to ongoing). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that anti-PD-1 therapy may be associated with reduced risk of toxic effects and improved survival among patients who have experienced severe toxic effects after ipilimumab therapy.
Authors: Caroline Robert; Georgina V Long; Benjamin Brady; Caroline Dutriaux; Michele Maio; Laurent Mortier; Jessica C Hassel; Piotr Rutkowski; Catriona McNeil; Ewa Kalinka-Warzocha; Kerry J Savage; Micaela M Hernberg; Celeste Lebbé; Julie Charles; Catalin Mihalcioiu; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Cornelia Mauch; Francesco Cognetti; Ana Arance; Henrik Schmidt; Dirk Schadendorf; Helen Gogas; Lotta Lundgren-Eriksson; Christine Horak; Brian Sharkey; Ian M Waxman; Victoria Atkinson; Paolo A Ascierto Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-11-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: F Stephen Hodi; Steven J O'Day; David F McDermott; Robert W Weber; Jeffrey A Sosman; John B Haanen; Rene Gonzalez; Caroline Robert; Dirk Schadendorf; Jessica C Hassel; Wallace Akerley; Alfons J M van den Eertwegh; Jose Lutzky; Paul Lorigan; Julia M Vaubel; Gerald P Linette; David Hogg; Christian H Ottensmeier; Celeste Lebbé; Christian Peschel; Ian Quirt; Joseph I Clark; Jedd D Wolchok; Jeffrey S Weber; Jason Tian; Michael J Yellin; Geoffrey M Nichol; Axel Hoos; Walter J Urba Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-06-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Elisa A Rozeman; Alexander M Menzies; Alexander C J van Akkooi; Chandra Adhikari; Carolien Bierman; Bart A van de Wiel; Richard A Scolyer; Oscar Krijgsman; Karolina Sikorska; Hanna Eriksson; Annegien Broeks; Johannes V van Thienen; Alexander D Guminski; Alex Torres Acosta; Sylvia Ter Meulen; Anne Miek Koenen; Linda J W Bosch; Kerwin Shannon; Loes M Pronk; Maria Gonzalez; Sydney Ch'ng; Lindsay G Grijpink-Ongering; Jonathan Stretch; Stijn Heijmink; Harm van Tinteren; John B A G Haanen; Omgo E Nieweg; Willem M C Klop; Charlotte L Zuur; Robyn P M Saw; Winan J van Houdt; Daniel S Peeper; Andrew J Spillane; Johan Hansson; Ton N Schumacher; Georgina V Long; Christian U Blank Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2019-05-31 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Jeffrey S Weber; Sandra P D'Angelo; David Minor; F Stephen Hodi; Ralf Gutzmer; Bart Neyns; Christoph Hoeller; Nikhil I Khushalani; Wilson H Miller; Christopher D Lao; Gerald P Linette; Luc Thomas; Paul Lorigan; Kenneth F Grossmann; Jessica C Hassel; Michele Maio; Mario Sznol; Paolo A Ascierto; Peter Mohr; Bartosz Chmielowski; Alan Bryce; Inge M Svane; Jean-Jacques Grob; Angela M Krackhardt; Christine Horak; Alexandre Lambert; Arvin S Yang; James Larkin Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: A M Menzies; D B Johnson; S Ramanujam; V G Atkinson; A N M Wong; J J Park; J L McQuade; A N Shoushtari; K K Tsai; Z Eroglu; O Klein; J C Hassel; J A Sosman; A Guminski; R J Sullivan; A Ribas; M S Carlino; M A Davies; S K Sandhu; G V Long Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Jeffrey S Weber; Ragini Reiney Kudchadkar; Bin Yu; Donna Gallenstein; Christine E Horak; H David Inzunza; Xiuhua Zhao; Alberto J Martinez; Wenshi Wang; Geoffrey Gibney; Jodi Kroeger; Cabell Eysmans; Amod A Sarnaik; Y Ann Chen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-10-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jedd D Wolchok; Harriet Kluger; Margaret K Callahan; Michael A Postow; Naiyer A Rizvi; Alexander M Lesokhin; Neil H Segal; Charlotte E Ariyan; Ruth-Ann Gordon; Kathleen Reed; Matthew M Burke; Anne Caldwell; Stephanie A Kronenberg; Blessing U Agunwamba; Xiaoling Zhang; Israel Lowy; Hector David Inzunza; William Feely; Christine E Horak; Quan Hong; Alan J Korman; Jon M Wigginton; Ashok Gupta; Mario Sznol Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-06-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: James Larkin; David Minor; Sandra D'Angelo; Bart Neyns; Michael Smylie; Wilson H Miller; Ralf Gutzmer; Gerald Linette; Bartosz Chmielowski; Christopher D Lao; Paul Lorigan; Kenneth Grossmann; Jessica C Hassel; Mario Sznol; Adil Daud; Jeffrey Sosman; Nikhil Khushalani; Dirk Schadendorf; Christoph Hoeller; Dana Walker; George Kong; Christine Horak; Jeffrey Weber Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-07-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Antoni Ribas; Igor Puzanov; Reinhard Dummer; Dirk Schadendorf; Omid Hamid; Caroline Robert; F Stephen Hodi; Jacob Schachter; Anna C Pavlick; Karl D Lewis; Lee D Cranmer; Christian U Blank; Steven J O'Day; Paolo A Ascierto; April K S Salama; Kim A Margolin; Carmen Loquai; Thomas K Eigentler; Tara C Gangadhar; Matteo S Carlino; Sanjiv S Agarwala; Stergios J Moschos; Jeffrey A Sosman; Simone M Goldinger; Ronnie Shapira-Frommer; Rene Gonzalez; John M Kirkwood; Jedd D Wolchok; Alexander Eggermont; Xiaoyun Nicole Li; Wei Zhou; Adriane M Zernhelt; Joy Lis; Scot Ebbinghaus; S Peter Kang; Adil Daud Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2015-06-23 Impact factor: 41.316