Antoni Ribas1, Igor Puzanov2, Reinhard Dummer3, Dirk Schadendorf4, Omid Hamid5, Caroline Robert6, F Stephen Hodi7, Jacob Schachter8, Anna C Pavlick9, Karl D Lewis10, Lee D Cranmer11, Christian U Blank12, Steven J O'Day13, Paolo A Ascierto14, April K S Salama15, Kim A Margolin16, Carmen Loquai17, Thomas K Eigentler18, Tara C Gangadhar19, Matteo S Carlino20, Sanjiv S Agarwala21, Stergios J Moschos22, Jeffrey A Sosman2, Simone M Goldinger3, Ronnie Shapira-Frommer8, Rene Gonzalez10, John M Kirkwood23, Jedd D Wolchok24, Alexander Eggermont6, Xiaoyun Nicole Li25, Wei Zhou25, Adriane M Zernhelt25, Joy Lis25, Scot Ebbinghaus25, S Peter Kang25, Adil Daud26. 1. University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: aribas@mednet.ucla.edu. 2. Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA. 3. University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland. 4. University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. 5. The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 6. Gustave Roussy and Paris-Sud University, Villejuif, France. 7. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. 8. Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel. 9. New York University Cancer Institute, New York, NY, USA. 10. University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, USA. 11. University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, USA. 12. Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 13. Beverly Hills Cancer Center, Beverly Hills, CA, USA. 14. Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy. 15. Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA. 16. Seattle Cancer Care Alliance/University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 17. University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany. 18. Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. 19. Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 20. Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, and Melanoma Institute Australia, Westmead, NSW, Australia. 21. St Luke's Cancer Center, Bethlehem, PA, USA; Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 22. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 23. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 24. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 25. Merck & Co, Kenilworth, NJ, USA. 26. University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with melanoma that progresses on ipilimumab and, if BRAF(V600) mutant-positive, a BRAF or MEK inhibitor or both, have few treatment options. We assessed the efficacy and safety of two pembrolizumab doses versus investigator-choice chemotherapy in patients with ipilimumab-refractory melanoma. METHODS: We carried out a randomised phase 2 trial of patients aged 18 years or older from 73 hospitals, clinics, and academic medical centres in 12 countries who had confirmed progressive disease within 24 weeks after two or more ipilimumab doses and, if BRAF(V600) mutant-positive, previous treatment with a BRAF or MEK inhibitor or both. Patients had to have resolution of all ipilimumab-related adverse events to grade 0-1 and prednisone 10 mg/day or less for at least 2 weeks, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and at least one measurable lesion to be eligible. Using a centralised interactive voice response system, we randomly assigned (1:1:1) patients in a block size of six to receive intravenous pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks or investigator-choice chemotherapy (paclitaxel plus carboplatin, paclitaxel, carboplatin, dacarbazine, or oral temozolomide). Randomisation was stratified by ECOG performance status, lactate dehydrogenase concentration, and BRAF(V600) mutation status. Individual treatment assignment between pembrolizumab and chemotherapy was open label, but investigators and patients were masked to assignment of the dose of pembrolizumab. We present the primary endpoint at the prespecified second interim analysis of progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01704287. The study is closed to enrolment but continues to follow up and treat patients. FINDINGS: Between Nov 30, 2012, and Nov 13, 2013, we enrolled 540 patients: 180 patients were randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg, 181 to receive pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg, and 179 to receive chemotherapy. Based on 410 progression-free survival events, progression-free survival was improved in patients assigned to pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg (HR 0·57, 95% CI 0·45-0·73; p<0·0001) and those assigned to pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg (0·50, 0·39-0·64; p<0·0001) compared with those assigned to chemotherapy. 6-month progression-free survival was 34% (95% CI 27-41) in the pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg group, 38% (31-45) in the 10 mg/kg group, and 16% (10-22) in the chemotherapy group. Treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 20 (11%) patients in the pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg group, 25 (14%) in the pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg group, and 45 (26%) in the chemotherapy group. The most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse event in the pembrolizumab groups was fatigue (two [1%] of 178 patients in the 2 mg/kg group and one [<1%] of 179 patients in the 10 mg/kg group, compared with eight [5%] of 171 in the chemotherapy group). Other treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events include generalised oedema and myalgia (each in two [1%] patients) in those given pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg; hypopituitarism, colitis, diarrhoea, decreased appetite, hyponatremia, and pneumonitis (each in two [1%]) in those given pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg; and anaemia (nine [5%]), fatigue (eight [5%]), neutropenia (six [4%]), and leucopenia (six [4%]) in those assigned to chemotherapy. INTERPRETATION: These findings establish pembrolizumab as a new standard of care for the treatment of ipilimumab-refractory melanoma. FUNDING: Merck Sharp & Dohme.
BACKGROUND: Patients with melanoma that progresses on ipilimumab and, if BRAF(V600) mutant-positive, a BRAF or MEK inhibitor or both, have few treatment options. We assessed the efficacy and safety of two pembrolizumab doses versus investigator-choice chemotherapy in patients with ipilimumab-refractory melanoma. METHODS: We carried out a randomised phase 2 trial of patients aged 18 years or older from 73 hospitals, clinics, and academic medical centres in 12 countries who had confirmed progressive disease within 24 weeks after two or more ipilimumab doses and, if BRAF(V600) mutant-positive, previous treatment with a BRAF or MEK inhibitor or both. Patients had to have resolution of all ipilimumab-related adverse events to grade 0-1 and prednisone 10 mg/day or less for at least 2 weeks, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and at least one measurable lesion to be eligible. Using a centralised interactive voice response system, we randomly assigned (1:1:1) patients in a block size of six to receive intravenous pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks or investigator-choice chemotherapy (paclitaxel plus carboplatin, paclitaxel, carboplatin, dacarbazine, or oral temozolomide). Randomisation was stratified by ECOG performance status, lactate dehydrogenase concentration, and BRAF(V600) mutation status. Individual treatment assignment between pembrolizumab and chemotherapy was open label, but investigators and patients were masked to assignment of the dose of pembrolizumab. We present the primary endpoint at the prespecified second interim analysis of progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01704287. The study is closed to enrolment but continues to follow up and treat patients. FINDINGS: Between Nov 30, 2012, and Nov 13, 2013, we enrolled 540 patients: 180 patients were randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg, 181 to receive pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg, and 179 to receive chemotherapy. Based on 410 progression-free survival events, progression-free survival was improved in patients assigned to pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg (HR 0·57, 95% CI 0·45-0·73; p<0·0001) and those assigned to pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg (0·50, 0·39-0·64; p<0·0001) compared with those assigned to chemotherapy. 6-month progression-free survival was 34% (95% CI 27-41) in the pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg group, 38% (31-45) in the 10 mg/kg group, and 16% (10-22) in the chemotherapy group. Treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 20 (11%) patients in the pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg group, 25 (14%) in the pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg group, and 45 (26%) in the chemotherapy group. The most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse event in the pembrolizumab groups was fatigue (two [1%] of 178 patients in the 2 mg/kg group and one [<1%] of 179 patients in the 10 mg/kg group, compared with eight [5%] of 171 in the chemotherapy group). Other treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events include generalised oedema and myalgia (each in two [1%] patients) in those given pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg; hypopituitarism, colitis, diarrhoea, decreased appetite, hyponatremia, and pneumonitis (each in two [1%]) in those given pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg; and anaemia (nine [5%]), fatigue (eight [5%]), neutropenia (six [4%]), and leucopenia (six [4%]) in those assigned to chemotherapy. INTERPRETATION: These findings establish pembrolizumab as a new standard of care for the treatment of ipilimumab-refractory melanoma. FUNDING: Merck Sharp & Dohme.
Authors: F Stephen Hodi; Steven J O'Day; David F McDermott; Robert W Weber; Jeffrey A Sosman; John B Haanen; Rene Gonzalez; Caroline Robert; Dirk Schadendorf; Jessica C Hassel; Wallace Akerley; Alfons J M van den Eertwegh; Jose Lutzky; Paul Lorigan; Julia M Vaubel; Gerald P Linette; David Hogg; Christian H Ottensmeier; Celeste Lebbé; Christian Peschel; Ian Quirt; Joseph I Clark; Jedd D Wolchok; Jeffrey S Weber; Jason Tian; Michael J Yellin; Geoffrey M Nichol; Axel Hoos; Walter J Urba Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-06-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Pia Kvistborg; Daisy Philips; Sander Kelderman; Lois Hageman; Christian Ottensmeier; Deborah Joseph-Pietras; Marij J P Welters; Sjoerd van der Burg; Ellen Kapiteijn; Olivier Michielin; Emanuela Romano; Carsten Linnemann; Daniel Speiser; Christian Blank; John B Haanen; Ton N Schumacher Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2014-09-17 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Rong Rong Huang; Jason Jalil; James S Economou; Bartosz Chmielowski; Richard C Koya; Stephen Mok; Hooman Sazegar; Elizabeth Seja; Arturo Villanueva; Jesus Gomez-Navarro; John A Glaspy; Alistair J Cochran; Antoni Ribas Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-05-10 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Jedd D Wolchok; Axel Hoos; Steven O'Day; Jeffrey S Weber; Omid Hamid; Celeste Lebbé; Michele Maio; Michael Binder; Oliver Bohnsack; Geoffrey Nichol; Rachel Humphrey; F Stephen Hodi Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-11-24 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Christian Blank; Ian Brown; Amy C Peterson; Mike Spiotto; Yoshiko Iwai; Tasuku Honjo; Thomas F Gajewski Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-02-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Edward Cha; Mark Klinger; Yafei Hou; Craig Cummings; Antoni Ribas; Malek Faham; Lawrence Fong Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2014-05-28 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Stefani Spranger; Robbert M Spaapen; Yuanyuan Zha; Jason Williams; Yuru Meng; Thanh T Ha; Thomas F Gajewski Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2013-08-28 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Omid Hamid; Caroline Robert; Adil Daud; F Stephen Hodi; Wen-Jen Hwu; Richard Kefford; Jedd D Wolchok; Peter Hersey; Richard W Joseph; Jeffrey S Weber; Roxana Dronca; Tara C Gangadhar; Amita Patnaik; Hassane Zarour; Anthony M Joshua; Kevin Gergich; Jeroen Elassaiss-Schaap; Alain Algazi; Christine Mateus; Peter Boasberg; Paul C Tumeh; Bartosz Chmielowski; Scot W Ebbinghaus; Xiaoyun Nicole Li; S Peter Kang; Antoni Ribas Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-06-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Paul C Tumeh; Christina L Harview; Jennifer H Yearley; I Peter Shintaku; Emma J M Taylor; Lidia Robert; Bartosz Chmielowski; Marko Spasic; Gina Henry; Voicu Ciobanu; Alisha N West; Manuel Carmona; Christine Kivork; Elizabeth Seja; Grace Cherry; Antonio J Gutierrez; Tristan R Grogan; Christine Mateus; Gorana Tomasic; John A Glaspy; Ryan O Emerson; Harlan Robins; Robert H Pierce; David A Elashoff; Caroline Robert; Antoni Ribas Journal: Nature Date: 2014-11-27 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Mizuki Nishino; Emily S Chambers; Curtis R Chong; Nikhil H Ramaiya; Stacy W Gray; J Paul Marcoux; Hiroto Hatabu; Pasi A Jänne; F Stephen Hodi; Mark M Awad Journal: Cancer Immunol Res Date: 2016-02-10 Impact factor: 11.151
Authors: Brittany L Bunch; Krithika N Kodumudi; Ellen Scott; Jennifer Morse; Amy Mackay Weber; Anders E Berglund; Shari Pilon-Thomas; Joseph Markowitz Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother Date: 2020-06-18 Impact factor: 6.968
Authors: Tobin Strom; Louis B Harrison; Anna R Giuliano; Michael J Schell; Steven A Eschrich; Anders Berglund; William Fulp; Ram Thapa; Domenico Coppola; Sungjune Kim; Jessica Frakes; John Foekens; James J Mulé; Javier F Torres-Roca Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: E Liniker; A M Menzies; B Y Kong; A Cooper; S Ramanujam; S Lo; R F Kefford; G B Fogarty; A Guminski; T W Wang; M S Carlino; A Hong; G V Long Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2016-08-19 Impact factor: 8.110
Authors: Charles S Fuchs; Toshihiko Doi; Raymond W Jang; Kei Muro; Taroh Satoh; Manuela Machado; Weijing Sun; Shadia I Jalal; Manish A Shah; Jean-Phillipe Metges; Marcelo Garrido; Talia Golan; Mario Mandala; Zev A Wainberg; Daniel V Catenacci; Atsushi Ohtsu; Kohei Shitara; Ravit Geva; Jonathan Bleeker; Andrew H Ko; Geoffrey Ku; Philip Philip; Peter C Enzinger; Yung-Jue Bang; Diane Levitan; Jiangdian Wang; Minori Rosales; Rita P Dalal; Harry H Yoon Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 31.777