Literature DB >> 26115796

Pembrolizumab versus investigator-choice chemotherapy for ipilimumab-refractory melanoma (KEYNOTE-002): a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial.

Antoni Ribas1, Igor Puzanov2, Reinhard Dummer3, Dirk Schadendorf4, Omid Hamid5, Caroline Robert6, F Stephen Hodi7, Jacob Schachter8, Anna C Pavlick9, Karl D Lewis10, Lee D Cranmer11, Christian U Blank12, Steven J O'Day13, Paolo A Ascierto14, April K S Salama15, Kim A Margolin16, Carmen Loquai17, Thomas K Eigentler18, Tara C Gangadhar19, Matteo S Carlino20, Sanjiv S Agarwala21, Stergios J Moschos22, Jeffrey A Sosman2, Simone M Goldinger3, Ronnie Shapira-Frommer8, Rene Gonzalez10, John M Kirkwood23, Jedd D Wolchok24, Alexander Eggermont6, Xiaoyun Nicole Li25, Wei Zhou25, Adriane M Zernhelt25, Joy Lis25, Scot Ebbinghaus25, S Peter Kang25, Adil Daud26.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with melanoma that progresses on ipilimumab and, if BRAF(V600) mutant-positive, a BRAF or MEK inhibitor or both, have few treatment options. We assessed the efficacy and safety of two pembrolizumab doses versus investigator-choice chemotherapy in patients with ipilimumab-refractory melanoma.
METHODS: We carried out a randomised phase 2 trial of patients aged 18 years or older from 73 hospitals, clinics, and academic medical centres in 12 countries who had confirmed progressive disease within 24 weeks after two or more ipilimumab doses and, if BRAF(V600) mutant-positive, previous treatment with a BRAF or MEK inhibitor or both. Patients had to have resolution of all ipilimumab-related adverse events to grade 0-1 and prednisone 10 mg/day or less for at least 2 weeks, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and at least one measurable lesion to be eligible. Using a centralised interactive voice response system, we randomly assigned (1:1:1) patients in a block size of six to receive intravenous pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks or investigator-choice chemotherapy (paclitaxel plus carboplatin, paclitaxel, carboplatin, dacarbazine, or oral temozolomide). Randomisation was stratified by ECOG performance status, lactate dehydrogenase concentration, and BRAF(V600) mutation status. Individual treatment assignment between pembrolizumab and chemotherapy was open label, but investigators and patients were masked to assignment of the dose of pembrolizumab. We present the primary endpoint at the prespecified second interim analysis of progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01704287. The study is closed to enrolment but continues to follow up and treat patients.
FINDINGS: Between Nov 30, 2012, and Nov 13, 2013, we enrolled 540 patients: 180 patients were randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg, 181 to receive pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg, and 179 to receive chemotherapy. Based on 410 progression-free survival events, progression-free survival was improved in patients assigned to pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg (HR 0·57, 95% CI 0·45-0·73; p<0·0001) and those assigned to pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg (0·50, 0·39-0·64; p<0·0001) compared with those assigned to chemotherapy. 6-month progression-free survival was 34% (95% CI 27-41) in the pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg group, 38% (31-45) in the 10 mg/kg group, and 16% (10-22) in the chemotherapy group. Treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 20 (11%) patients in the pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg group, 25 (14%) in the pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg group, and 45 (26%) in the chemotherapy group. The most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse event in the pembrolizumab groups was fatigue (two [1%] of 178 patients in the 2 mg/kg group and one [<1%] of 179 patients in the 10 mg/kg group, compared with eight [5%] of 171 in the chemotherapy group). Other treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events include generalised oedema and myalgia (each in two [1%] patients) in those given pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg; hypopituitarism, colitis, diarrhoea, decreased appetite, hyponatremia, and pneumonitis (each in two [1%]) in those given pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg; and anaemia (nine [5%]), fatigue (eight [5%]), neutropenia (six [4%]), and leucopenia (six [4%]) in those assigned to chemotherapy.
INTERPRETATION: These findings establish pembrolizumab as a new standard of care for the treatment of ipilimumab-refractory melanoma. FUNDING: Merck Sharp & Dohme.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26115796      PMCID: PMC9004487          DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00083-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  27 in total

1.  Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  F Stephen Hodi; Steven J O'Day; David F McDermott; Robert W Weber; Jeffrey A Sosman; John B Haanen; Rene Gonzalez; Caroline Robert; Dirk Schadendorf; Jessica C Hassel; Wallace Akerley; Alfons J M van den Eertwegh; Jose Lutzky; Paul Lorigan; Julia M Vaubel; Gerald P Linette; David Hogg; Christian H Ottensmeier; Celeste Lebbé; Christian Peschel; Ian Quirt; Joseph I Clark; Jedd D Wolchok; Jeffrey S Weber; Jason Tian; Michael J Yellin; Geoffrey M Nichol; Axel Hoos; Walter J Urba
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Anti-CTLA-4 therapy broadens the melanoma-reactive CD8+ T cell response.

Authors:  Pia Kvistborg; Daisy Philips; Sander Kelderman; Lois Hageman; Christian Ottensmeier; Deborah Joseph-Pietras; Marij J P Welters; Sjoerd van der Burg; Ellen Kapiteijn; Olivier Michielin; Emanuela Romano; Carsten Linnemann; Daniel Speiser; Christian Blank; John B Haanen; Ton N Schumacher
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  CTLA4 blockade induces frequent tumor infiltration by activated lymphocytes regardless of clinical responses in humans.

Authors:  Rong Rong Huang; Jason Jalil; James S Economou; Bartosz Chmielowski; Richard C Koya; Stephen Mok; Hooman Sazegar; Elizabeth Seja; Arturo Villanueva; Jesus Gomez-Navarro; John A Glaspy; Alistair J Cochran; Antoni Ribas
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Guidelines for the evaluation of immune therapy activity in solid tumors: immune-related response criteria.

Authors:  Jedd D Wolchok; Axel Hoos; Steven O'Day; Jeffrey S Weber; Omid Hamid; Celeste Lebbé; Michele Maio; Michael Binder; Oliver Bohnsack; Geoffrey Nichol; Rachel Humphrey; F Stephen Hodi
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  PD-L1/B7H-1 inhibits the effector phase of tumor rejection by T cell receptor (TCR) transgenic CD8+ T cells.

Authors:  Christian Blank; Ian Brown; Amy C Peterson; Mike Spiotto; Yoshiko Iwai; Tasuku Honjo; Thomas F Gajewski
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Improved survival with T cell clonotype stability after anti-CTLA-4 treatment in cancer patients.

Authors:  Edward Cha; Mark Klinger; Yafei Hou; Craig Cummings; Antoni Ribas; Malek Faham; Lawrence Fong
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  Up-regulation of PD-L1, IDO, and T(regs) in the melanoma tumor microenvironment is driven by CD8(+) T cells.

Authors:  Stefani Spranger; Robbert M Spaapen; Yuanyuan Zha; Jason Williams; Yuru Meng; Thanh T Ha; Thomas F Gajewski
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 17.956

8.  Safety and tumor responses with lambrolizumab (anti-PD-1) in melanoma.

Authors:  Omid Hamid; Caroline Robert; Adil Daud; F Stephen Hodi; Wen-Jen Hwu; Richard Kefford; Jedd D Wolchok; Peter Hersey; Richard W Joseph; Jeffrey S Weber; Roxana Dronca; Tara C Gangadhar; Amita Patnaik; Hassane Zarour; Anthony M Joshua; Kevin Gergich; Jeroen Elassaiss-Schaap; Alain Algazi; Christine Mateus; Peter Boasberg; Paul C Tumeh; Bartosz Chmielowski; Scot W Ebbinghaus; Xiaoyun Nicole Li; S Peter Kang; Antoni Ribas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-06-02       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  PD-1 and PD-1 ligands: from discovery to clinical application.

Authors:  Taku Okazaki; Tasuku Honjo
Journal:  Int Immunol       Date:  2007-07-02       Impact factor: 4.823

10.  PD-1 blockade induces responses by inhibiting adaptive immune resistance.

Authors:  Paul C Tumeh; Christina L Harview; Jennifer H Yearley; I Peter Shintaku; Emma J M Taylor; Lidia Robert; Bartosz Chmielowski; Marko Spasic; Gina Henry; Voicu Ciobanu; Alisha N West; Manuel Carmona; Christine Kivork; Elizabeth Seja; Grace Cherry; Antonio J Gutierrez; Tristan R Grogan; Christine Mateus; Gorana Tomasic; John A Glaspy; Ryan O Emerson; Harlan Robins; Robert H Pierce; David A Elashoff; Caroline Robert; Antoni Ribas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  558 in total

Review 1.  Current progress in immunotherapy for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Kelly Foley; Victoria Kim; Elizabeth Jaffee; Lei Zheng
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 8.679

2.  Anti-PD-1 Inhibitor-Related Pneumonitis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Mizuki Nishino; Emily S Chambers; Curtis R Chong; Nikhil H Ramaiya; Stacy W Gray; J Paul Marcoux; Hiroto Hatabu; Pasi A Jänne; F Stephen Hodi; Mark M Awad
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 11.151

3.  CD137-CRDI is not necessary in the role of contacting its natural ligand.

Authors:  Ling Yi; Zhuohong Yan; Hongyan Jia; Xiaojue Wang; Yanlin Zhao; Hongtao Zhang
Journal:  Immunol Cell Biol       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 5.126

4.  Anti-tumor efficacy of plasmid encoding emm55 in a murine melanoma model.

Authors:  Brittany L Bunch; Krithika N Kodumudi; Ellen Scott; Jennifer Morse; Amy Mackay Weber; Anders E Berglund; Shari Pilon-Thomas; Joseph Markowitz
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 6.968

Review 5.  Pembrolizumab (Keytruda).

Authors:  Gerry Kwok; Thomas C C Yau; Joanne W Chiu; Eric Tse; Yok-Lam Kwong
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Neurotoxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Authors:  Sophie L Duong; Frank J Barbiero; Richard J Nowak; Joachim M Baehring
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-01-17       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 7.  RAS-targeted therapies: is the undruggable drugged?

Authors:  Amanda R Moore; Scott C Rosenberg; Frank McCormick; Shiva Malek
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 84.694

8.  Tumour radiosensitivity is associated with immune activation in solid tumours.

Authors:  Tobin Strom; Louis B Harrison; Anna R Giuliano; Michael J Schell; Steven A Eschrich; Anders Berglund; William Fulp; Ram Thapa; Domenico Coppola; Sungjune Kim; Jessica Frakes; John Foekens; James J Mulé; Javier F Torres-Roca
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Activity and safety of radiotherapy with anti-PD-1 drug therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  E Liniker; A M Menzies; B Y Kong; A Cooper; S Ramanujam; S Lo; R F Kefford; G B Fogarty; A Guminski; T W Wang; M S Carlino; A Hong; G V Long
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 8.110

10.  Safety and Efficacy of Pembrolizumab Monotherapy in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: Phase 2 Clinical KEYNOTE-059 Trial.

Authors:  Charles S Fuchs; Toshihiko Doi; Raymond W Jang; Kei Muro; Taroh Satoh; Manuela Machado; Weijing Sun; Shadia I Jalal; Manish A Shah; Jean-Phillipe Metges; Marcelo Garrido; Talia Golan; Mario Mandala; Zev A Wainberg; Daniel V Catenacci; Atsushi Ohtsu; Kohei Shitara; Ravit Geva; Jonathan Bleeker; Andrew H Ko; Geoffrey Ku; Philip Philip; Peter C Enzinger; Yung-Jue Bang; Diane Levitan; Jiangdian Wang; Minori Rosales; Rita P Dalal; Harry H Yoon
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 31.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.