Literature DB >> 32666392

What is semantic diversity and why does it facilitate visual word recognition?

Benedetta Cevoli1, Chris Watkins2, Kathleen Rastle3.   

Abstract

Previous research has speculated that semantic diversity and lexical ambiguity may be closely related constructs. Our research sought to test this claim in respect of the semantic diversity measure proposed by Hoffman et al. (2013). To this end, we replicated the procedure described by Hoffman et al., Behavior Research Methods, 45(3), 718-730 (2013) for computing multidimensional representations of contextual information using Latent Semantic Analysis, and from these we derived semantic diversity values for 28,555 words. We then replicated the facilitatory effect of semantic diversity on word recognition using existing data resources and observed this effect to be greater for low-frequency words. Yet, we found no relationship between this measure and lexical ambiguity effects in word recognition. Further analysis of the LSA-based contextual representations used to compute Hoffman et al. (2013) measure of semantic diversity revealed that they do not capture the distinct meanings of ambiguous words. Instead, these contextual representations appear to capture general information about the topics and types of written material in which words occur. These analyses suggest that the semantic diversity metric previously proposed by Hoffman et al. (2013) facilitates word recognition because high-diversity words are likely to have been encountered no matter what one has read, whereas many participants may not have encountered lower-diversity words simply because the topics and types of written material in which they occur are more restricted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Latent semantic analysis; Lexical ambiguity; Semantic diversity; Word frequency

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32666392      PMCID: PMC7880980          DOI: 10.3758/s13428-020-01440-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  15 in total

1.  Rethinking the word frequency effect: the neglected role of distributional information in lexical processing.

Authors:  S A McDonald; R C Shillcock
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.500

2.  Extracting semantic representations from word co-occurrence statistics: stop-lists, stemming, and SVD.

Authors:  John A Bullinaria; Joseph P Levy
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2012-09

3.  Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times.

Authors:  James S Adelman; Gordon D A Brown; José F Quesada
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-09

4.  Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words.

Authors:  Victor Kuperman; Hans Stadthagen-Gonzalez; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2012-12

5.  Effects of word frequency, contextual diversity, and semantic distinctiveness on spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Brendan T Johns; Thomas M Gruenenfelder; David B Pisoni; Michael N Jones
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Learning about things that never happened: A critique and refinement of the Rescorla-Wagner update rule when many outcomes are possible.

Authors:  Geoff Hollis
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-10

7.  Semantic diversity: a measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words.

Authors:  Paul Hoffman; Matthew A Lambon Ralph; Timothy T Rogers
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2013-09

8.  The English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Michael J Cortese; Keith A Hutchison; Brett Kessler; Bjorn Loftis; James H Neely; Douglas L Nelson; Greg B Simpson; Rebecca Treiman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08

9.  The British Lexicon Project: lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words.

Authors:  Emmanuel Keuleers; Paula Lacey; Kathleen Rastle; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2012-03

10.  Opposing effects of semantic diversity in lexical and semantic relatedness decisions.

Authors:  Paul Hoffman; Anna M Woollams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  4 in total

1.  Divergent semantic integration (DSI): Extracting creativity from narratives with distributional semantic modeling.

Authors:  Dan R Johnson; James C Kaufman; Brendan S Baker; John D Patterson; Baptiste Barbot; Adam E Green; Janet van Hell; Evan Kennedy; Grace F Sullivan; Christa L Taylor; Thomas Ward; Roger E Beaty
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-10-17

2.  Shabd: A psycholinguistic database for Hindi.

Authors:  Ark Verma; Vivek Sikarwar; Himanshu Yadav; Ranjith Jaganathan; Pawan Kumar
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-08-06

3.  Context Availability and Sentence Availability Ratings for 3,000 English Words and their Association with Lexical Processing.

Authors:  Ellen Taylor; Kate Nation; Yaling Hsiao
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2022-03-09

4.  Semantic diversity is best measured with unscaled vectors: Reply to Cevoli, Watkins and Rastle (2020).

Authors:  Paul Hoffman; Matthew A Lambon Ralph; Timothy T Rogers
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-09-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.