Literature DB >> 23239067

Semantic diversity: a measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words.

Paul Hoffman1, Matthew A Lambon Ralph, Timothy T Rogers.   

Abstract

Semantic ambiguity is typically measured by summing the number of senses or dictionary definitions that a word has. Such measures are somewhat subjective and may not adequately capture the full extent of variation in word meaning, particularly for polysemous words that can be used in many different ways, with subtle shifts in meaning. Here, we describe an alternative, computationally derived measure of ambiguity based on the proposal that the meanings of words vary continuously as a function of their contexts. On this view, words that appear in a wide range of contexts on diverse topics are more variable in meaning than those that appear in a restricted set of similar contexts. To quantify this variation, we performed latent semantic analysis on a large text corpus to estimate the semantic similarities of different linguistic contexts. From these estimates, we calculated the degree to which the different contexts associated with a given word vary in their meanings. We term this quantity a word's semantic diversity (SemD). We suggest that this approach provides an objective way of quantifying the subtle, context-dependent variations in word meaning that are often present in language. We demonstrate that SemD is correlated with other measures of ambiguity and contextual variability, as well as with frequency and imageability. We also show that SemD is a strong predictor of performance in semantic judgments in healthy individuals and in patients with semantic deficits, accounting for unique variance beyond that of other predictors. SemD values for over 30,000 English words are provided as supplementary materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23239067     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0278-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  72 in total

1.  The influence of contextual diversity on word learning.

Authors:  Brendan T Johns; Melody Dye; Michael N Jones
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

Review 2.  REBUS and the Anarchic Brain: Toward a Unified Model of the Brain Action of Psychedelics.

Authors:  R L Carhart-Harris; K J Friston
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 3.  What we talk about when we talk about access deficits.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; Allison E Britt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The influence of contextual diversity on eye movements in reading.

Authors:  Patrick Plummer; Manuel Perea; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Network Controllability in the Inferior Frontal Gyrus Relates to Controlled Language Variability and Susceptibility to TMS.

Authors:  John D Medaglia; Denise Y Harvey; Nicole White; Apoorva Kelkar; Jared Zimmerman; Danielle S Bassett; Roy H Hamilton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Abstract Conceptual Feature Ratings Predict Gaze Within Written Word Arrays: Evidence From a Visual Wor(l)d Paradigm.

Authors:  Silvia Primativo; Jamie Reilly; Sebastian J Crutch
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-02-22

7.  Polysemy Advantage with Abstract But Not Concrete Words.

Authors:  Bernadet Jager; Alexandra A Cleland
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-02

8.  Semantic richness effects in lexical decision: The role of feedback.

Authors:  Melvin J Yap; Gail Y Lim; Penny M Pexman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-11

9.  The ERP signature of the contextual diversity effect in visual word recognition.

Authors:  Marta Vergara-Martínez; Montserrat Comesaña; Manuel Perea
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  It's all in the delivery: Effects of context valence, arousal, and concreteness on visual word processing.

Authors:  Bryor Snefjella; Victor Kuperman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-08-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.