Literature DB >> 32666265

Acquisition of landmark, route, and survey knowledge in a wayfinding task: in stages or in parallel?

Kyungwan Kim1, Otmar Bock2.   

Abstract

According to an influential concept, humans acquire spatial knowledge about their environment in three distinct stages: landmark knowledge is acquired first, then route knowledge, and finally survey knowledge. The stage concept has been challenged by studies which observed that in a wayfinding paradigm, route, and survey knowledge emerge at the same time and; therefore, were seemingly acquired in parallel. However, this experimental evidence is not conclusive because the above studies suffered from a ceiling effect. The present study was designed to overcome the ceiling effect by increasing the complexity of the wayfinding task. We asked 60 young participants to find their way through an urban environment rendered in virtual reality, and assessed their landmark, route, and survey knowledge after each of ten trials. We found that all three types of knowledge gradually increased from the first to the last trial. We further found that correlations between the three types of knowledge increased from trial to trial. This outcome disagrees profoundly with the stage concept, but is compatible with the parallel concept. Specifically, it is in accordance with the view that landmark, route, and survey knowledge are acquired by multiple overlapping and interacting processes: those processes may start out more or less independently in the first trial but, due to common constraints or synergies, may gradually increase their cooperation during subsequent trials.
© 2020. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32666265     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-020-01384-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  11 in total

1.  The development of relational landmark use in six- to twelve-month-old infants in a spatial orientation task.

Authors:  A R Lew; J G Bremner; L P Lefkovitch
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct

Review 2.  The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments.

Authors:  A W Siegel; S H White
Journal:  Adv Child Dev Behav       Date:  1975

3.  Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places.

Authors:  Toru Ishikawa; Daniel R Montello
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Knowing where things are in the second year of life: implications for hippocampal development.

Authors:  Julia Sluzenski; Nora S Newcombe; Eric Satlow
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Cognitive maps in rats and men.

Authors:  E C TOLMAN
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1948-07       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Variations in cognitive maps: understanding individual differences in navigation.

Authors:  Steven M Weisberg; Victor R Schinazi; Nora S Newcombe; Thomas F Shipley; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Spatial knowledge acquisition in younger and elderly adults: a study in a virtual environment.

Authors:  Petra Jansen; Andrea Schmelter; Martin Heil
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2010

8.  Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation.

Authors:  P W Thorndyke; B Hayes-Roth
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Wayfinding behavior and spatial knowledge of adults and children in a virtual environment: The role of landmarks.

Authors:  Petra Jansen-Osmann; Petra Fuchs
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2006

10.  A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children.

Authors:  L Hermer; E S Spelke
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-07-07       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.