Shahir Masri1, Alana LeBrón2, Michael Logue3, Enrique Valencia4, Abel Ruiz5, Abigail Reyes6, Jean M Lawrence7, Jun Wu8. 1. Program in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA. Electronic address: masris@uci.edu. 2. Program in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA; Department of Chicano/Latino Studies, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA. 3. Program in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA. 4. Orange County Environmental Justice, Santa Ana, CA 92705, USA. 5. Jóvenes Cultivando Cambios, Santa Ana, CA 92705, USA. 6. Community Resilience, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA. 7. Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA. 8. Program in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA; Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, University of California, Irvine 92617, CA, USA. Electronic address: junwu@uci.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lead (Pb) exposure is a problem that disproportionately impacts low-income communities and communities of color. We applied a community-based participatory research approach to assess the distribution of soil Pb concentrations and related social vulnerabilities across Census tracts in Santa Ana, CA. METHODS: Soil Pb samples (n = 1528) were collected by the ¡Plo-NO! Santa Ana! Lead-Free Santa Ana! partnership in 2018 across Santa Ana, CA, at a high spatial resolution and measured using XRF analysis. Pb concentrations were mapped and spatial interpolation was conducted to generate a continuous smoothed map of soil Pb concentrations across the city. American Community Survey data was used to examine Pb across Census tracts based on social and economic factors, and to allow for the development of a Cumulative Risk Index to identify areas at high risk of health impacts. RESULTS: Soil Pb concentrations varied by landuse type and socioeconomic factors. Census tracts with a median household income below $50,000 had over five times higher soil Pb concentrations than high-income Census tracts. Soil samples collected in tertiles with the highest percent children, residents without health insurance, renter-occupied housing units, and lowest percent college educated residents had 90.0%, 96.1%, 75.2%, and 87.0% higher Pb concentrations on average, respectively, compared to their counterparts. Overall, 52.7% of residential samples had Pb concentrations in excess of the 80 ppm California EPA recommendation, and 11 Census tracts were characterized as high risk according to our Cumulative Risk Index. DISCUSSION: This study underscores the need for precautionary measures relating to disturbances of the soil, particularly for areas where children play outside, given children's higher absorption of lead. It also informs environmental justice initiatives and identifies vulnerable subpopulations at greater risk of Pb exposure, thus warranting community-driven recommendations for policies and initiatives to remediate soil Pb and protect public health and health equity.
BACKGROUND: Lead (Pb) exposure is a problem that disproportionately impacts low-income communities and communities of color. We applied a community-based participatory research approach to assess the distribution of soil Pb concentrations and related social vulnerabilities across Census tracts in Santa Ana, CA. METHODS: Soil Pb samples (n = 1528) were collected by the ¡Plo-NO! Santa Ana! Lead-Free Santa Ana! partnership in 2018 across Santa Ana, CA, at a high spatial resolution and measured using XRF analysis. Pb concentrations were mapped and spatial interpolation was conducted to generate a continuous smoothed map of soil Pb concentrations across the city. American Community Survey data was used to examine Pb across Census tracts based on social and economic factors, and to allow for the development of a Cumulative Risk Index to identify areas at high risk of health impacts. RESULTS: Soil Pb concentrations varied by landuse type and socioeconomic factors. Census tracts with a median household income below $50,000 had over five times higher soil Pb concentrations than high-income Census tracts. Soil samples collected in tertiles with the highest percent children, residents without health insurance, renter-occupied housing units, and lowest percent college educated residents had 90.0%, 96.1%, 75.2%, and 87.0% higher Pb concentrations on average, respectively, compared to their counterparts. Overall, 52.7% of residential samples had Pb concentrations in excess of the 80 ppm California EPA recommendation, and 11 Census tracts were characterized as high risk according to our Cumulative Risk Index. DISCUSSION: This study underscores the need for precautionary measures relating to disturbances of the soil, particularly for areas where children play outside, given children's higher absorption of lead. It also informs environmental justice initiatives and identifies vulnerable subpopulations at greater risk of Pb exposure, thus warranting community-driven recommendations for policies and initiatives to remediate soil Pb and protect public health and health equity.
Authors: Richard L Canfield; Charles R Henderson; Deborah A Cory-Slechta; Christopher Cox; Todd A Jusko; Bruce P Lanphear Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-04-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Nanhua Zhang; Harolyn W Baker; Margaret Tufts; Randall E Raymond; Hamisu Salihu; Michael R Elliott Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-01-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Sammy Zahran; Mark A S Laidlaw; Shawn P McElmurry; Gabriel M Filippelli; Mark Taylor Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2013-03-04 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: James L Sadd; Manuel Pastor; Rachel Morello-Frosch; Justin Scoggins; Bill Jesdale Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2011-05-06 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Shahir Masri; Alana M W LeBrón; Michael D Logue; Patricia Flores; Abel Ruiz; Abigail Reyes; Juan Manuel Rubio; Jun Wu Journal: Toxics Date: 2022-06-03