| Literature DB >> 32660555 |
Tian Qian1,2, Haitao Zhu3, Li Zhu1, Chao Chen1, Chun Shen4, Rong Zhang5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Studies of microbiota composition of infants with small intestinal ostomy due to various etiologies are limited. Here, we characterized the intestinal microbiota of neonates with ileostomy resulting from distinct primary diseases.Entities:
Keywords: Ileostomy; Infant; Microbiota; Necrotizing enterocolitis; Nutrition
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32660555 PMCID: PMC7359560 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-020-01366-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Gastroenterol ISSN: 1471-230X Impact factor: 3.067
Clinical information for patients with different primary diseases (data were presented as median)
| Infant characteristic | All patients with ileostomy ( | Primary diagnosis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hirschsprung’s disease (HD, | Meconium peritonitis(MP, | Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC, | ||
| Male sex, n | 20 | 4 | 3 | 13 |
| Gestational age (week) | 34 (25–40) | 36.8 (30–40) | 36.3 (34–40) | 31.4 (25–39) |
| The operation day age (day) | 19.8 (0–77) | 24.1 (1–50) | 4.7 (0–17) | 24.5 (3–77) |
| Operative weight (kg, range) | 2.2 (1.0–3.5) | 2.6 (1.3–3.5) | 2.7 (1.6–3.3) | 1.7 (1.0–3.5) |
| Remaining small bowel length (cm) | 86.9 (40–160) | 96.9 (80–110) | 79.8 (40–160) | 84.8 (72–100) |
| Breast feeding, n | 8 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Parenteral nutrition duration (day) | 38.3 (11–91) | 33.5 (11–91) | 48.3 (17–85) | 36.1 (20–74) |
| Colitis, n | 12 | 6 | 3 | 3 |
| Septicemia, n | 22 | 7 | 4 | 11 |
| Shannon index | 1.17 (0.2–1.83) | 1.37 (0.78–1.8) | 1.14 (1.01–1.55) | 1.07 (0.2–1.83) |
Fig. 1Microbial communities in infants with ileostomy. Panel a shows the proportion of family within the microbiota in patients with HD (H01-H08), MP (M01-M07), and NEC (N01-N15). Panel b shows the proportion of genus within the microbiota in patients with HD (H01-H08), MP (M01-M07), and NEC (N01-N15). HD: Hirschsprung’s disease; MP: meconium peritonitis; NEC: necrotizing enterocolitis
Fig. 2Heatmap of the relative abundance of the signature genera in infants with ileostomy. Each parallel lane corresponds to one sample. Relative abundance percentage of each genus in the corresponding whole community is indicated by the color scale. Blue: 0, white: 0.01 (1%), and yellow: 0.5 (50%)
Influence of breastfeeding on ileostomy patients
| No BF (22/30) | BF (8/30) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Growth rate of body mass (g/d) | 21.2 | 27.4 | 0.091 # |
| Colitis (n) | 11 | 1 | 0.152※ |
| Sepsis (n) | 18 | 4 | 0.202※ |
| 0.34 | 4.90 | 0.180# | |
| 9.30 | 18.40 | 0.429# |
# T-Test; ※ Chi-square test
Fig. 3Canonical correspondence analysis (Canoco 4.5 CCA) of the effects of different factors. a Ordination diagram of canonical correspondence analysis exhibits bacterial species and environmental variables and primary diseases (arrows). b Influence of environmental variables and primary diseases on samples, which plotted on the same axes as the first panel. Axis 1 explains 42.9% of the variation, whereas axis 2 explains an additional 19.3%. HD: Hirschsprung’s disease; MP: meconium peritonitis; NEC: necrotizing enterocolitis; DAW: duration of antibiotic withdrawal, BF: breastfeeding; PN: parenteral nutrition; RIL: residual intestinal length