Literature DB >> 32660504

Voxel-level biological optimisation of prostate IMRT using patient-specific tumour location and clonogen density derived from mpMRI.

E J Her1, A Haworth2, H M Reynolds3,4, Y Sun3,4, A Kennedy5, V Panettieri6, M Bangert7,8, S Williams3,9, M A Ebert10,5,11.   

Abstract

AIMS: This study aimed to develop a framework for optimising prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) based on patient-specific tumour biology, derived from multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). The framework included a probabilistic treatment planning technique in the effort to yield dose distributions with an improved expected treatment outcome compared with uniform-dose planning approaches.
METHODS: IMRT plans were generated for five prostate cancer patients using two inverse planning methods: uniform-dose to the planning target volume and probabilistic biological optimisation for clinical target volume tumour control probability (TCP) maximisation. Patient-specific tumour location and clonogen density information were derived from mpMRI and geometric uncertainties were incorporated in the TCP calculation. Potential reduction in dose to sensitive structures was assessed by comparing dose metrics of uniform-dose plans with biologically-optimised plans of an equivalent level of expected tumour control.
RESULTS: The planning study demonstrated biological optimisation has the potential to reduce expected normal tissue toxicity without sacrificing local control by shaping the dose distribution to the spatial distribution of tumour characteristics. On average, biologically-optimised plans achieved 38.6% (p-value: < 0.01) and 51.2% (p-value: < 0.01) reduction in expected rectum and bladder equivalent uniform dose, respectively, when compared with uniform-dose planning.
CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that varying the dose distribution within the prostate to take account for each patient's clonogen distribution was feasible. Lower doses to normal structures compared to uniform-dose plans was possible whilst providing robust plans against geometric uncertainties. Further validation in a larger cohort is warranted along with considerations for adaptive therapy and limiting urethral dose.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dose-painting; IMRT; Multiparametric MRI; Probabilistic treatment planning; Tumour control probability

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32660504      PMCID: PMC7805066          DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01568-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1748-717X            Impact factor:   3.481


  60 in total

1.  The probability of correct target dosage: dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy.

Authors:  M van Herk; P Remeijer; C Rasch; J V Lebesque
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  A radiobiology-based inverse treatment planning method for optimisation of permanent l-125 prostate implants in focal brachytherapy.

Authors:  Annette Haworth; Christopher Mears; John M Betts; Hayley M Reynolds; Guido Tack; Kevin Leo; Scott Williams; Martin A Ebert
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Development of the open-source dose calculation and optimization toolkit matRad.

Authors:  Hans-Peter Wieser; Eduardo Cisternas; Niklas Wahl; Silke Ulrich; Alexander Stadler; Henning Mescher; Lucas-Raphael Müller; Thomas Klinge; Hubert Gabrys; Lucas Burigo; Andrea Mairani; Swantje Ecker; Benjamin Ackermann; Malte Ellerbrock; Katia Parodi; Oliver Jäkel; Mark Bangert
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Dose painting by numbers based on retrospectively determined recurrence probabilities.

Authors:  Eric Grönlund; Silvia Johansson; Anders Montelius; Anders Ahnesjö
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Hypoxic prostate/muscle pO2 ratio predicts for biochemical failure in patients with prostate cancer: preliminary findings.

Authors:  Benjamin Movsas; J Donald Chapman; Alexandra L Hanlon; Eric M Horwitz; Richard E Greenberg; Corinne Stobbe; Gerald E Hanks; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Repeatability of dose painting by numbers treatment planning in prostate cancer radiotherapy based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Marcel A van Schie; Peter Steenbergen; Cuong Viet Dinh; Ghazaleh Ghobadi; Petra J van Houdt; Floris J Pos; Stijn W T J P Heijmink; Henk G van der Poel; Steffen Renisch; Torbjørn Vik; Uulke A van der Heide
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Heterogeneity of prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  M Aihara; T M Wheeler; M Ohori; P T Scardino
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Voxel Level Radiologic-Pathologic Validation of Restriction Spectrum Imaging Cellularity Index with Gleason Grade in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Ghiam Yamin; Natalie M Schenker-Ahmed; Ahmed Shabaik; Dennis Adams; Hauke Bartsch; Joshua Kuperman; Nathan S White; Rebecca A Rakow-Penner; Kevin McCammack; J Kellogg Parsons; Christopher J Kane; Anders M Dale; David S Karow
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Association analysis between quantitative MRI features and hypoxia-related genetic profiles in prostate cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Yu Sun; Scott Williams; David Byrne; Simon Keam; Hayley M Reynolds; Catherine Mitchell; Darren Wraith; Declan Murphy; Annette Haworth
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Radiation dose escalation based on FDG-PET driven dose painting by numbers in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison between TomoTherapy-HA and RapidArc.

Authors:  Sarah Differding; Edmond Sterpin; Nicolas Hermand; Bianca Vanstraelen; Sandra Nuyts; Nathalie de Patoul; Jean-Marc Denis; John Aldo Lee; Vincent Grégoire
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.481

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Radiomic assessment of oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a critical review of 18F-FDG PET/CT, PET/MRI and CT.

Authors:  Robert J O'Shea; Chris Rookyard; Sam Withey; Gary J R Cook; Sophia Tsoka; Vicky Goh
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-06-17

2.  A statistical, voxelised model of prostate cancer for biologically optimised radiotherapy.

Authors:  Robert N Finnegan; Hayley M Reynolds; Martin A Ebert; Yu Sun; Lois Holloway; Jonathan R Sykes; Jason Dowling; Catherine Mitchell; Scott G Williams; Declan G Murphy; Annette Haworth
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-03-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.