Nrusheel Kattar1, Triet M Do2, Graham D Unis3, Matthew R Migneron2, Andrew J Thomas3, Edward D McCoul1,2,3. 1. Ochsner Clinical School, University of Queensland School of Medicine, Queensland, USA. 2. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. 3. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Olfactory dysfunction is a common problem that is most frequently attributed to upper respiratory infection. Postviral olfactory dysfunction (PVOD) can be prolonged and clinically challenging to treat. Olfactory training (OT) has demonstrated potential benefit for patients with nonspecific olfactory dysfunction. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of OT specifically for PVOD by pooled analysis of the existing evidence. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. REVIEW METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were queried and abstracts screened independently by 2 investigators. We included studies evaluating the efficacy of OT for PVOD and excluded studies evaluating pharmacologic interventions or olfactory loss from other causes. RESULTS: Of the initial 1981 abstracts reviewed, 16 full-text articles were included. Sniffin' Sticks olfactory testing results were reported in 15 (93%) studies as threshold (T), discrimination (D), and identification (I) subscores and TDI total scores. All studies reported clinically significant results after OT, defined as a score improvement of TDI >5.5. Four studies were included in the meta-analysis, in which pooled estimates revealed that patients with PVOD who received OT had a 2.77 (95% confidence interval, 1.67-4.58) higher odds of achieving a clinically important difference in TDI scores compared to controls. CONCLUSION: Meta-analysis of existing data demonstrates clinically significant improvements in PVOD associated with OT. Variability exists among OT protocols and may benefit from further optimization. Existing data supports the use of OT for the treatment of existing and newly emerging cases of PVOD.
OBJECTIVE:Olfactory dysfunction is a common problem that is most frequently attributed to upper respiratory infection. Postviral olfactory dysfunction (PVOD) can be prolonged and clinically challenging to treat. Olfactory training (OT) has demonstrated potential benefit for patients with nonspecific olfactory dysfunction. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of OT specifically for PVOD by pooled analysis of the existing evidence. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. REVIEW METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were queried and abstracts screened independently by 2 investigators. We included studies evaluating the efficacy of OT for PVOD and excluded studies evaluating pharmacologic interventions or olfactory loss from other causes. RESULTS: Of the initial 1981 abstracts reviewed, 16 full-text articles were included. Sniffin' Sticks olfactory testing results were reported in 15 (93%) studies as threshold (T), discrimination (D), and identification (I) subscores and TDI total scores. All studies reported clinically significant results after OT, defined as a score improvement of TDI >5.5. Four studies were included in the meta-analysis, in which pooled estimates revealed that patients with PVOD who received OT had a 2.77 (95% confidence interval, 1.67-4.58) higher odds of achieving a clinically important difference in TDI scores compared to controls. CONCLUSION: Meta-analysis of existing data demonstrates clinically significant improvements in PVOD associated with OT. Variability exists among OT protocols and may benefit from further optimization. Existing data supports the use of OT for the treatment of existing and newly emerging cases of PVOD.
Authors: Samuel N Helman; Jonah Adler; Aria Jafari; Sasha Bennett; Jackson R Vuncannon; Ashley C Cozart; Sarah K Wise; Merin E Kuruvilla; Joshua M Levy Journal: Allergy Asthma Proc Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 2.587
Authors: Richard Byaruhanga; Fiona Kabagenyi; Douglas Ssenyonjo Kagga; Christopher Ndoleriire; Adriane Kamulegeya; Lamech Ssemwogerere; Ronald Kiguba; Bruce Kirenga; Emily Kakande Journal: OTO Open Date: 2022-06-30
Authors: Jake J Lee; Andrew M Peterson; Dorina Kallogjeri; Pawina Jiramongkolchai; Sara Kukuljan; John S Schneider; Cristine N Klatt-Cromwell; Andrew J Drescher; Joseph D Brunworth; Jay F Piccirillo Journal: Am J Otolaryngol Date: 2021-12-03 Impact factor: 2.873
Authors: Heike Rebholz; Ralf J Braun; Dennis Ladage; Wolfgang Knoll; Christoph Kleber; Achim W Hassel Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2020-10-26 Impact factor: 4.003