Literature DB >> 32656521

Features, Outcomes, and Management Strategies of Male Breast Cancer: A Single Institution Comparison to Well-Matched Female Controls.

Joseph Liu1,2, Anupama Suresh1,2, Marilly Palettas3, Julie Stephens3, Akaansha Ganju1,2, Evan Morgan1,2, Mahmoud Kassem1,2, Yanjun Hou4, Anil Parwani4, Anne Noonan1,2, Raquel Reinbolt1,2, Jeffrey VanDeusen1,2, Sagar Sardesai1,2, Nicole Williams1,2, Mathew Cherian1,2, Gary Tozbikian4, Daniel G Stover1,2, Maryam Lustberg1,2, Zaibo Li4, Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy1,2, Robert Wesolowski1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to delineate differences in management, overall and distant disease-free survival in males diagnosed with breast cancer and treated at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center as compared to comprehensively matched female subjects. Secondary objectives included assessment of clinical and histopathologic features and recurrence score, as measured by Oncotype DX and the modified Magee equation #2.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single institution retrospective study compared male and comprehensively matched female patients (1:2) with stage I-III breast cancer between 1994 and 2014. Recurrence risk was estimated using a modified Magee equation. Overall survival and distant disease-free survival were estimated and compared using Kaplan-Meier and Log-rank methods.
RESULTS: Forty-five male breast cancer patients were included (stage I: 26.7%; stage II: 53.3%; stage III: 20.0%; hormone receptor positive: 97.8%; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative: 84.4%) with a median age of 63.8 (43.0-79.4) years at diagnosis. Intermediate and low recurrence scores were most common in male and female patients respectively; mean score was similar between groups (20.3 vs. 19.8). The proportion of male breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and post-mastectomy radiation was lower compared to female patients (42.2% vs. 65.3%, p=0.013; 22.7% vs. 44.4%, p=0.030, respectively). Overall survival and distant disease-free survival between male and female patients were similar.
CONCLUSION: Male breast cancer patient outcomes were similar compared to well-matched female patients suggesting that breast cancer specific factors are more prognostic than gender.
Copyright © 2020 Turkish Federation of Breast Diseases Associations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Male breast cancer; matched-pair analysis; rare disease; recurrence score; survival analysis

Year:  2020        PMID: 32656521      PMCID: PMC7337913          DOI: 10.5152/ejbh.2020.5536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Breast Health


  32 in total

1.  The 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Male Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Gulisa Turashvili; Monica Gonzalez-Loperena; Edi Brogi; Maura Dickler; Larry Norton; Monica Morrow; Hannah Y Wen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Male breast cancer: a population-based comparison with female breast cancer.

Authors:  William F Anderson; Ismail Jatoi; Julia Tse; Philip S Rosenberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Prognostic significance of tumor subtypes in male breast cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  José Pablo Leone; Julieta Leone; Ariel Osvaldo Zwenger; Julián Iturbe; Carlos Teodoro Vallejo; Bernardo Amadeo Leone
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Survival benefit of tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitor in male and female breast cancer.

Authors:  Holm Eggemann; Udo Altmann; Serban-Dan Costa; Atanas Ignatov
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Male breast cancer. Evolution of treatment and prognostic factors. Analysis of 489 cases.

Authors:  B Cutuli; C Cohen-Solal Le-Nir; D Serin; Y Kirova; Z Gaci; C Lemanski; B De Lafontan; M Zoubir; P Maingon; H Mignotte; C Tunon de Lara; J Edeline; F Penault-Llorca; P Romestaing; C Delva; B Comet; Y Belkacemi
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 6.312

6.  Molecular markers in male breast carcinoma.

Authors:  D Rayson; C Erlichman; V J Suman; P C Roche; L E Wold; J N Ingle; J H Donohue
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Molecular Characterization and Mortality From Breast Cancer in Men.

Authors:  Suleiman Alfred Massarweh; George W Sledge; Dave P Miller; Debbie McCullough; Valentina I Petkov; Steven Shak
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Male breast cancer: results of the treatments and prognostic factors in 397 cases.

Authors:  B Cutuli; M Lacroze; J M Dilhuydy; M Velten; B De Lafontan; C Marchal; M Resbeut; Y Graic; F Campana; V Moncho-Bernier
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Current management of male breast cancer. A review of 104 cases.

Authors:  P I Borgen; G Y Wong; V Vlamis; C Potter; B Hoffmann; D W Kinne; M P Osborne; W M McKinnon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Dachshund 1 is Differentially Expressed Between Male and Female Breast Cancer: A Matched Case-Control Study of Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis.

Authors:  Qiuxia Cui; Deguang Kong; Zhihua Li; Philemon Ahiable; Kun Wang; Kongming Wu; Gaosong Wu
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  1 in total

1.  Relevance of the 21-gene expression assay in male breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matthew G Davey; Ciara M Davey; Luis Bouz; Eoin Kerin; Carson McFeetors; Aoife J Lowery; Michael J Kerin
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.254

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.