Literature DB >> 19442535

Male breast cancer. Evolution of treatment and prognostic factors. Analysis of 489 cases.

B Cutuli1, C Cohen-Solal Le-Nir, D Serin, Y Kirova, Z Gaci, C Lemanski, B De Lafontan, M Zoubir, P Maingon, H Mignotte, C Tunon de Lara, J Edeline, F Penault-Llorca, P Romestaing, C Delva, B Comet, Y Belkacemi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infiltrating MBC represents less than 1% of all male cancers. Our study details clinico-pathological features, treatments and prognostic factors in a large French cohort.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four hundred and eighty-nine patients were collected from 1990 to 2005. Median age was 66 years (34% over 70 years) and median follow-up 58 months.
RESULTS: According to TN classification, we found T(1): 39%, T(2): 41%, T(3)T(4): 9%, T(x): 11% and N(1)N(2): 27%. Lumpectomy (L) and mastectomy (M) were performed in 8.6% and 91.4% of the cases. Axillary dissection (AD), sentinel node biopsy or both were performed in 90%, 2% and 5% of the cases, respectively. Ninety-five percent of tumours were ductal carcinomas; 47% were pT(1), 20% pT(2) and 33% pT(3)-T(4). Axillary nodal involvement was present in 52.8% cases. ER and PgR were positive in 92% and 89% cases. Radiotherapy (RT) was performed in 85% of the patients. Hormonal treatment (HT) was delivered in 72% of the cases. Tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors were used in 85% and 12% of the cases; 34% of the patients received chemotherapy (CT). Local recurrence (LR), nodal recurrences (NR) and metastases occurred in 2%, 5% and 22% of the cases; 2% and 10% developed contralateral BC and second cancer. The 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates were 81% and 59%; disease-specific survivals (DSS) were 89% and 72%. Death causes were BC 56%, second cancer 8%, complications 3%, intercurrent disease 15% and unknown 18%. In a univariate analysis, metastatic risk factors were T stage (T1: 19%, T(2): 26%, T(3)T(4): 40%; p=0.013), pN status (pN(0): 12% pN(1-3): 26% pN(>3): 44%; p<0.0001) and presence of locoregional recurrence (62% versus 18% p<0.0001). In a multivariate analysis, axillary nodal involvement and high SBR remain prognostic factors.
CONCLUSION: Earlier diagnosis and wide use of adjuvant treatments (RT/HT/CT) widely decreased LR and increased survival rates in MBC, reaching female ones. Prognostic factors were also very similar to female ones. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19442535     DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2009.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol        ISSN: 1040-8428            Impact factor:   6.312


  30 in total

1.  Outcome of non-metastatic male breast cancer: 118 patients.

Authors:  Ulkü Yalçıntaş Arslan; Berna Oksüzoğlu; Nuriye Ozdemir; Sercan Aksoy; Necati Alkış; Ayşe Gök; Mehmet Ali Kaplan; Mahmut Gümüş; Veli Berk; Doğan Uncu; Meltem Baykara; Dilşen Colak; Ummügül Uyetürk; Ibrahim Türker; Abdurrahman Işıkdoğan
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Metastatic male breast cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  Robert Foerster; Lars Schroeder; Frank Foerster; Volker Wulff; Birgit Schubotz; Dieter Baaske; Christian Rudlowski
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 3.  Male Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Metin Yalaza; Aydın İnan; Mikdat Bozer
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2016-01-01

Review 4.  Mammography Findings of Male Breast Diseases.

Authors:  Kadihan Yalçın Şafak
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2015-07-01

5.  Multidisciplinary meeting on male breast cancer: summary and research recommendations.

Authors:  Larissa A Korde; Jo Anne Zujewski; Leah Kamin; Sharon Giordano; Susan Domchek; William F Anderson; John M S Bartlett; Karen Gelmon; Zeina Nahleh; Jonas Bergh; Bruno Cutuli; Giancarlo Pruneri; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Julie Gralow; Gabriel Hortobagyi; Fatima Cardoso
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Breast-conserving surgery should not be recommended to men with early-stage breast cancer simply because we can perform these operations.

Authors:  Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  HemOnc Today       Date:  2016-06-25

7.  Intratumoral estrogen concentration and expression of estrogen-induced genes in male breast carcinoma: comparison with female breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Takagi; Takuya Moriya; Masafumi Kurosumi; Kimako Oka; Yasuhiro Miki; Akiko Ebata; Takashi Toshima; Shoji Tsunekawa; Hiroyuki Takei; Hisashi Hirakawa; Takanori Ishida; Shin-Ichi Hayashi; Junichi Kurebayashi; Hironobu Sasano; Takashi Suzuki
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 3.869

8.  Are there biologic differences between male and female breast cancer explaining inferior outcome of men despite equal stage and treatment?!

Authors:  A-C Müller; C Gani; H M E Rehm; F Eckert; M Bamberg; T Hehr; M Weinmann
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Men and women show similar survival rates after breast cancer.

Authors:  Paulo Franscisco Mascarenhas Bender; Letícia Lima de Oliveira; Célia Regina Costa; Suzana Sales de Aguiar; Anke Bergmann; Luiz Claudio Santos Thuler
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  Influence of Age on the Clinical Outcome of Breast Cancer for Men and the Development of Second Primary Cancers.

Authors:  Patricia A Cronin; Anya Romanoff; Emily C Zabor; Michelle Stempel; Anne Eaton; Lillian M Smyth; Alice Y Ho; Monica Morrow; Mahmoud El-Tamer; Mary L Gemignani
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.