PURPOSE: Segmentation of organs-at-risk (OARs) is a weak link in radiotherapeutic treatment planning process because the manual contouring action is labor-intensive and time-consuming. This work aimed to develop a deep learning-based method for rapid and accurate pancreatic multi-organ segmentation that can expedite the treatment planning process. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated one hundred patients with computed tomography (CT) simulation scanned and contours delineated. Eight OARs including large bowel, small bowel, duodenum, left kidney, right kidney, liver, spinal cord and stomach were the target organs to be segmented. The proposed three-dimensional (3D) deep attention U-Net is featured with a deep attention strategy to effectively differentiate multiple organs. Performance of the proposed method was evaluated using six metrics, including Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), sensitivity, specificity, Hausdorff distance 95% (HD95), mean surface distance (MSD) and residual mean square distance (RMSD). RESULTS: The contours generated by the proposed method closely resemble the ground-truth manual contours, as evidenced by encouraging quantitative results in terms of DSC, sensitivity, specificity, HD95, MSD and RMSD. For DSC, mean values of 0.91 ± 0.03, 0.89 ± 0.06, 0.86 ± 0.06, 0.95 ± 0.02, 0.95 ± 0.02, 0.96 ± 0.01, 0.87 ± 0.05 and 0.93 ± 0.03 were achieved for large bowel, small bowel, duodenum, left kidney, right kidney, liver, spinal cord and stomach, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method could significantly expedite the treatment planning process by rapidly segmenting multiple OARs. The method could potentially be used in pancreatic adaptive radiotherapy to increase dose delivery accuracy and minimize gastrointestinal toxicity.
PURPOSE: Segmentation of organs-at-risk (OARs) is a weak link in radiotherapeutic treatment planning process because the manual contouring action is labor-intensive and time-consuming. This work aimed to develop a deep learning-based method for rapid and accurate pancreatic multi-organ segmentation that can expedite the treatment planning process. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated one hundred patients with computed tomography (CT) simulation scanned and contours delineated. Eight OARs including large bowel, small bowel, duodenum, left kidney, right kidney, liver, spinal cord and stomach were the target organs to be segmented. The proposed three-dimensional (3D) deep attention U-Net is featured with a deep attention strategy to effectively differentiate multiple organs. Performance of the proposed method was evaluated using six metrics, including Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), sensitivity, specificity, Hausdorff distance 95% (HD95), mean surface distance (MSD) and residual mean square distance (RMSD). RESULTS: The contours generated by the proposed method closely resemble the ground-truth manual contours, as evidenced by encouraging quantitative results in terms of DSC, sensitivity, specificity, HD95, MSD and RMSD. For DSC, mean values of 0.91 ± 0.03, 0.89 ± 0.06, 0.86 ± 0.06, 0.95 ± 0.02, 0.95 ± 0.02, 0.96 ± 0.01, 0.87 ± 0.05 and 0.93 ± 0.03 were achieved for large bowel, small bowel, duodenum, left kidney, right kidney, liver, spinal cord and stomach, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method could significantly expedite the treatment planning process by rapidly segmenting multiple OARs. The method could potentially be used in pancreatic adaptive radiotherapy to increase dose delivery accuracy and minimize gastrointestinal toxicity.
Authors: Toshiyuki Okada; Marius George Linguraru; Masatoshi Hori; Ronald M Summers; Noriyuki Tomiyama; Yoshinobu Sato Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2015-07-04 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Tonghe Wang; Yang Lei; Sibo Tian; Xiaojun Jiang; Jun Zhou; Tian Liu; Sean Dresser; Walter J Curran; Hui-Kuo Shu; Xiaofeng Yang Journal: Med Phys Date: 2019-05-21 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Sven Olberg; Olga Green; Bin Cai; Deshan Yang; Vivian Rodriguez; Hao Zhang; Jin Sung Kim; Parag J Parikh; Sasa Mutic; Justin C Park Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2018-03-24 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Luke A Matkovic; Tonghe Wang; Yang Lei; Oladunni O Akin-Akintayo; Olayinka A Abiodun Ojo; Akinyemi A Akintayo; Justin Roper; Jeffery D Bradley; Tian Liu; David M Schuster; Xiaofeng Yang Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2021-12-07 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Daniel T Huff; Peter Ferjancic; Mauro Namías; Hamid Emamekhoo; Scott B Perlman; Robert Jeraj Journal: Biomed Phys Eng Express Date: 2021-09-30
Authors: José S Enriquez; Yan Chu; Shivanand Pudakalakatti; Kang Lin Hsieh; Duncan Salmon; Prasanta Dutta; Niki Zacharias Millward; Eugene Lurie; Steven Millward; Florencia McAllister; Anirban Maitra; Subrata Sen; Ann Killary; Jian Zhang; Xiaoqian Jiang; Pratip K Bhattacharya; Shayan Shams Journal: JMIR Med Inform Date: 2021-06-17