Literature DB >> 32653969

Diagnostic value of preoperative ultrasonography, cervical length measurement, and POP-Q examination in cervical elongation estimation.

Ismail Alay1, Cihan Kaya2, Ibrahim Karaca3, Sukru Yildiz2, Huseyin Cengiz4, Murat Ekin2, Levent Yasar2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Cervical elongation (CE) has not been clearly defined and has similar symptoms to pelvic organ prolapse. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of preoperative POP-Q examinations, ultrasonographic measurements, and direct cervical length measurement with a Foley catheter in predicting CE on postoperative hysterectomy specimens.
METHODS: Fifty-six patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy for apical pelvic organ prolapse were included. The patients were divided into two groups based on the hysterectomy specimens' corpus/cervix ratio (CCR) as follows: the non-CE group, CCR > 1; the CE group, CCR < 1. The preoperative direct cervical length measurement was performed using 10-French Foley catheters. The recommended cutoff values and sensitivity/specificity analysis of the cervical measurements with Foley, ultrasound, and C-D measurements according to POP-Q were determined by the receiver-operating characteristic analysis.
RESULTS: There were 13 patients (23%) in the non-CE group and 43 patients (76%) in the CE group. The mean cervical measurements with Foley catheter and ultrasound, C-D diameter, and postoperative cervix measurements were 49.4 ± 12.6 mm, 42.14 ± 9.4 mm, 41.4 ± 17.2 mm, and 49.5 ± 13 mm, respectively. Cervical measurement with a Foley catheter had 65% sensitivity and 62.5% specificity with a 47.5-mm cutoff value. Among these preoperative measurements, Foley catheter measurements were the most compatible with postoperative cervical measurements. There was no significant association between CE and age, body mass index, menopause duration, point C, and point D.
CONCLUSION: Cervical length measurement with a Foley catheter may be preferred for estimation of CE.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical elongation; Cervical length; Foley catheter; Pelvic organ prolapse; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32653969     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-020-04426-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  13 in total

Review 1.  Uterine preservation during surgery for uterovaginal prolapse: a review.

Authors:  Aparna Diwan; Charles R Rardin; Neeraj Kohli
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug

2.  Comparison of the POP-Q examination, transvaginal ultrasound, and direct anatomic measurement of cervical length.

Authors:  Christina E Dancz; Lisa Werth; Vanessa Sun; Sandy Lee; Daphne Walker; Begüm Özel
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  A comparison of long-term outcome between Manchester Fothergill and vaginal hysterectomy as treatment for uterine descent.

Authors:  Susanne D Thys; Anne- Lotte Coolen; Ingrid R Martens; Herman P Oosterbaan; Jan- Paul W R Roovers; Ben- Willem Mol; Marlies Y Bongers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Extreme cervical elongation after sacrohysteropexy.

Authors:  Mark E Vierhout; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Systematic classification of uterine cervical elongation in patients with pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Anke R Mothes; Henning Mothes; Rosemarie Fröber; Marc P Radosa; Ingo B Runnebaum
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 2.435

6.  Risk factors for failure of transvaginal sacrospinous uterine suspension in the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse.

Authors:  Tzu-Yin Lin; Tsung-Hsien Su; Yeou-Lih Wang; Mei-Yu Lee; Ching-Hung Hsieh; Kuo-Gon Wang; Gin-Den Chen
Journal:  J Formos Med Assoc       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Is cervical elongation associated with pelvic organ prolapse?

Authors:  Mitchell B Berger; Rajeev Ramanah; Kenneth E Guire; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Defining Cervical Elongation: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Patrick A Nosti; Robert E Gutman; Cheryl B Iglesia; Amy J Park; Eshetu Tefera; Andrew I Sokol
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2017-04

9.  Cervical elongation following sacrospinous hysteropexy: a case series.

Authors:  Momoe Tina Hyakutake; Geoffrey William Cundiff; Roxana Geoffrion
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Incidence of pelvic organ prolapse in Nigerian women.

Authors:  J E N Okonkwo; N J A Obiechina; C N Obionu
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.798

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cervical Elongation - The Search for a Definition.

Authors:  Ofer Shemer; Yana Vinikov; Michal Shaubi-Rosen; Gil Levy
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2022-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.