Literature DB >> 15909062

Risk factors for failure of transvaginal sacrospinous uterine suspension in the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse.

Tzu-Yin Lin1, Tsung-Hsien Su, Yeou-Lih Wang, Mei-Yu Lee, Ching-Hung Hsieh, Kuo-Gon Wang, Gin-Den Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to elucidate the risk factors for failure of transvaginal sacrospinous uterine suspension (SSUS) in the treatment of uterine prolapse and to examine methods for controlling these risk factors.
METHODS: Sixty patients with second degree uterine prolapse or greater were included in this 2-stage study, with 33 in the risk factor assessment and 27 in the clinical study of a modified treatment to eliminate identified risk factors. Patients were followed for at least 5 years. The first part of the study evaluated the risk factors for operative failure and the efficacy of the operative procedure. The second part of the study evaluated a modified treatment plan to eliminate risk factors identified in the first part of the study.
RESULTS: The failure rate for those with an elongated cervix (3 of 4, 75%) and those with third degree uterine prolapse (3 of 4, 75%) was significantly higher than for patients without either of these risk factors (6.9%, 2/29) [p = 0.007]. Concomitant partial trachelectomy for those with elongated cervix significantly reduced the failure rate from 75% to 0% (0/7) [p = 0.024]. In the risk factor study, SSUS was successful in 84.8% (28/33) of patients. In the clinical study of modified therapy to prevent significant risk factors, the success rate was 96.3% (26/27).
CONCLUSIONS: This study found that an elongated cervix and third degree uterine prolapse were the 2 main risk factors for recurrent uterine prolapse after SSUS. Concomitant partial trachelectomy as an adjuvant treatment of SSUS for treatment of uterovaginal prolapse in patients with an elongated cervix significantly reduces the rate of failure in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15909062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Formos Med Assoc        ISSN: 0929-6646            Impact factor:   3.282


  16 in total

Review 1.  Vaginal surgery for uterine descent; which options do we have? A review of the literature.

Authors:  Viviane Dietz; Steven E Schraffordt Koops; Steven E Schraffordt Koops; C Huub van der Vaart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-12-16

Review 2.  Uterine-preserving POP surgery.

Authors:  Robert Gutman; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Uterine-preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Kate V Meriwether; Ethan M Balk; Danielle D Antosh; Cedric K Olivera; Shunaha Kim-Fine; Miles Murphy; Cara L Grimes; Ambereen Sleemi; Ruchira Singh; Alexis A Dieter; Catrina C Crisp; David D Rahn
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Sacrospinous hysteropexy: review and meta-analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  Shveta Kapoor; Kanapathippillai Sivanesan; Jessica Amy Robertson; Mayooran Veerasingham; Vishal Kapoor
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs.

Authors:  Christine Hemming; Lynda Constable; Beatriz Goulao; Mary Kilonzo; Dwayne Boyers; Andrew Elders; Kevin Cooper; Anthony Smith; Robert Freeman; Suzanne Breeman; Alison McDonald; Suzanne Hagen; Isobel Montgomery; John Norrie; Cathryn Glazener
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 6.  The Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of uterine prolapse: a review.

Authors:  Cæcilie Krogsgaard Tolstrup; Gunnar Lose; Niels Klarskov
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Diagnostic value of preoperative ultrasonography, cervical length measurement, and POP-Q examination in cervical elongation estimation.

Authors:  Ismail Alay; Cihan Kaya; Ibrahim Karaca; Sukru Yildiz; Huseyin Cengiz; Murat Ekin; Levent Yasar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Outcome of transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery with Prolift after a median of 2 years' follow-up.

Authors:  Wen-Chu Huang; Tzu-Yin Lin; Hui-Hsuan Lau; Shwu-Shiuang Chen; Ching-Hung Hsieh; Tsung-Hsien Su
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Analysis of risk factors associated with surgical failure of sacrospinous suspension for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  Huey-Yi Chen; Tsan-Hung Chiu; Ming Ho; Yao-Ching Hung
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-12-16

10.  Change over time in the surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse between 2008 and 2014 in France: patient profiles, surgical approaches, and outcomes.

Authors:  Mathilde Hendriks; Stéphanie Bartolo; Géraldine Giraudet; Michel Cosson; Emmanuel Chazard
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.