Literature DB >> 32653073

Integrated sports and respiratory medicine in the aftermath of COVID-19.

Mark A Faghy1, Ruth Em Ashton2, Tom M Maden-Wilkinson3, Robert J Copeland3, Thomas Bewick4, Andy Smith5, Mike Loosemore6.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32653073      PMCID: PMC7347343          DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30307-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Respir Med        ISSN: 2213-2600            Impact factor:   30.700


× No keyword cloud information.
COVID-19 has revealed inequalities in health, wellbeing, and economic status across communities and has exposed vulnerabilities in societal groups. While the pressure of the first peak abates, there is an urgent need to consider the long-term care needs of those affected by COVID-19 to ensure that it does not widen inequality. At the time of writing, the long-term effects on recovering patients remains unknown. Research on Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (SARS) and Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERS) infection are associated with persisting abnormal radiographic change, substantial impairment of exercise and functional capacity, and reduced quality of life following Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). More than 50% of patients hospitalised by COVID-19 could have profound musculoskeletal and neurological de-conditioning and require substantial care and support. Alongside those needing intense clinical support, additional resource is needed to provide support for patients recovering from COVID-19 with mild symptoms. Large numbers of patients are being discharged into community settings with substantial comorbidities and will require intermediate (3–6 months) and chronic (>12 months) support, placing unprecedented demand on health-care services. COVID-19 is a novel virus that presents two key challenges: first, there is little evidence to support the development of support strategies (ie, to improve physical and mental wellbeing) for patients and it is unclear how this overwhelming demand on health-care services will be met. A truly multidisciplinary and collaborative approach that brings together respiratory medicine and clinical services alongside sports medicine, exercise science, engineering, and software and digital technology will help to develop an increased evidence base and to deliver support, improving patient outcomes. Combined insight from respiratory and sports and exercise medicine can offer a unified approach to understand the complex and chronic nature of recovery from COVID-19. Interrogative procedures, such as cardiopulmonary exercise testing and body composition scanning, can evaluate individuals recovering from severe infection. These techniques can characterise cardiorespiratory fitness and the effects of de-conditioning due to COVID-19 that underpin functional impairment. They can, therefore, support the development of efficacious rehabilitation strategies. Rehabilitation resources are scarce in the NHS; without a solid understanding of the recovery trajectory of COVID-19, it is hard to plan a response to deal with the inevitable increase in demand for these resources. One way to partially address the issue of limited rehabilitation capacity is to use sports and exercise medicine expertise to design and deliver interventions and address patients' physical and mental health needs. The physical health of patients is the primary focus of rehabilitation programmes and yet previous epidemics have shown that the mental health and wellbeing of patients and health-care workers is also negatively affected. Lockdown and physical distancing implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic may lead to a greater negative effect on mental health than during the SARS pandemic. Evidence suggests that regular structured exercise and psychological interventions used in exercise science are effective in improving mental health and can address broader health and wellbeing issues, such as anxiety, depression, and social isolation, similar to those elicited by COVID-19. Interventions must extend beyond clinical settings to support individuals and communities, where an increase in depressive and anxiety symptoms have been reported. Sports medicine practitioners can help support patients in their recovery from COVID-19, but health and social care policy makers, commissioners, and managers first need to understand what resources are available from this sector. For example, the provision of specific knowledge from sport medicine personnel in academic and applied settings; use of exercise physiology laboratories, which can be repurposed to provide testing facilities for patients recovering from COVID-19 in the community; and use of sports centres across the UK as COVID-19 rehabilitation centres (especially university-based centres that specialise in sports and exercise medicine). With the risk of a second peak of infections, the need to provide support for patients recovering from COVID-19, and a potential outbreak of seasonal influenza, clinical services may well be overwhelmed once more. To effectively tackle current and future health-care emergencies, we must marshal our resources and develop strong collaborative approaches that combine clinical and sports medicine disciplines.
  4 in total

Review 1.  An Evolving Approach to Assessing Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Muscle Function and Bone and Joint Health in the COVID-19 Era.

Authors:  Ross Arena; Jonathan Myers; Cemal Ozemek; Grenita Hall; Richard Severin; Deepika Laddu; Leonard A Kaminsky; Lee Stoner; Ryan T Conners; Mark A Faghy
Journal:  Curr Probl Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 5.200

2.  Motor Simulation as an Adjunct to Patient Recovery Process Following Intensive Care Unit Admission.

Authors:  Claire Calmels; Sébastien Le Garrec; Franck Brocherie
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-17

Review 3.  Post pandemic research priorities: A consensus statement from the HL-PIVOT.

Authors:  Mark A Faghy; Ross Arena; Abraham Samuel Babu; Jeffrey W Christle; Susan Marzolini; Dejana Popovic; Amber Vermeesch; Nicolaas P Pronk; Lee Stoner; Andy Smith
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 11.278

4.  Long COVID and the role of physical activity: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Helen Humphreys; Laura Kilby; Nik Kudiersky; Robert Copeland
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.