Literature DB >> 32651769

Training novice robot surgeons: Proctoring provides same results as simulator-generated guidance.

A J W Beulens1,2, Y A F Hashish3, W M Brinkman4, P Umari5, S Puliatti6,7,8, E L Koldewijn3, A J M Hendrikx9, J P van Basten10, J J G van Merriënboer11, H G Van der Poel12, C H Bangma13, C Wagner14,15.   

Abstract

To understand the influence of proctored guidance versus simulator generated guidance (SGG) on the acquisition dexterity skills in novice surgeons learning RAS (robot assisted surgery). Prospective non-blinded 3-arm randomised controlled trial (RTC). Exclusion criteria: previous experience in RAS or robotic surgery simulation. The participants were assigned to three different intervention groups and received a different form of guidance: (1) proctored guidance, (2) simulator generated guidance, (3) no guidance, during training on virtual reality (VR) simulator. All participants were asked to complete multiple questionnaires. The training was the same in all groups with the exception of the intervention part. Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, The Netherlands. A total of 70 Dutch medical students, PhD-students, and surgical residents were included in the study. The participants were randomly assigned to one of the three groups. Overall, all the participants showed a significant improvement in their dexterity skills after the training. There was no significant difference in the improvement of surgical skills between the three different intervention groups. The proctored guidance group reported a higher participant satisfaction compared to the simulator-generated guidance group, which could indicate a higher motivation to continue the training. This study showed that novice surgeons. Significantly increase their dexterity skills in RAS after a short time of practicing on simulator. The lack of difference in results between the intervention groups could indicate there is a limited impact of "human proctoring" on dexterity skills during surgical simulation training. Since there is no difference between the intervention groups the exposure alone of novice surgeons to the robotic surgery simulator could possibly be sufficient to achieve a significant improvement of dexterity skills during the initial steps of RAS learning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; Education; Robot assisted surgery; Robotics; Training

Year:  2020        PMID: 32651769     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01118-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  3 in total

1.  Establishing objective benchmarks in robotic virtual reality simulation at the level of a competent surgeon using the RobotiX Mentor simulator.

Authors:  William Watkinson; Nicholas Raison; Takashige Abe; Patrick Harrison; Shamim Khan; Henk Van der Poel; Prokar Dasgupta; Kamran Ahmed
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Implementing assessments of robot-assisted technical skill in urological education: a systematic review and synthesis of the validity evidence.

Authors:  Mitchell G Goldenberg; Jason Y Lee; Jethro C C Kwong; Teodor P Grantcharov; Anthony Costello
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Learning Curves of Virtual Mastoidectomy in Distributed and Massed Practice.

Authors:  Steven Arild Wuyts Andersen; Lars Konge; Per Cayé-Thomasen; Mads Sølvsten Sørensen
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 6.223

  3 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Virtual Simulation in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Scoping Review of Recent Practice.

Authors:  Qingming Wu; Yubin Wang; Lili Lu; Yong Chen; Hui Long; Jun Wang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.