Literature DB >> 29511043

Establishing objective benchmarks in robotic virtual reality simulation at the level of a competent surgeon using the RobotiX Mentor simulator.

William Watkinson1, Nicholas Raison2, Takashige Abe2, Patrick Harrison1, Shamim Khan2, Henk Van der Poel3, Prokar Dasgupta2, Kamran Ahmed2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To establish objective benchmarks at the level of a competent robotic surgeon across different exercises and metrics for the RobotiX Mentor virtual reality (VR) simulator suitable for use within a robotic surgical training curriculum.
METHODS: This retrospective observational study analysed results from multiple data sources, all of which used the RobotiX Mentor VR simulator. 123 participants with varying experience from novice to expert completed the exercises. Competency was established as the 25th centile of the mean advanced intermediate score. Three basic skill exercises and two advanced skill exercises were used.
SETTING: King's College London. PARTICIPANTS: 84 Novice, 26 beginner intermediates, 9 advanced intermediates and 4 experts were used in this retrospective observational study.
RESULTS: Objective benchmarks derived from the 25th centile of the mean scores of the advanced intermediates provided suitably challenging yet also achievable targets for training surgeons. The disparity in scores was greatest for the advanced exercises. Novice surgeons are able to achieve the benchmarks across all exercises in the majority of metrics.
CONCLUSION: We have successfully created this proof-of-concept study, which requires validation in a larger cohort. Objective benchmarks obtained from the 25th centile of the mean scores of advanced intermediates provide clinically relevant benchmarks at the standard of a competent robotic surgeon that are challenging yet also attainable. That can be used within a VR training curriculum allowing participants to track and monitor their progress in a structured and progressional manner through five exercises. Providing clearly defined targets, ensuring that a universal training standard has been achieved across training surgeons. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  benchmark; robotic; simulation; surgical education

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29511043     DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2017-135351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  5 in total

1.  Training novice robot surgeons: Proctoring provides same results as simulator-generated guidance.

Authors:  A J W Beulens; Y A F Hashish; W M Brinkman; P Umari; S Puliatti; E L Koldewijn; A J M Hendrikx; J P van Basten; J J G van Merriënboer; H G Van der Poel; C H Bangma; C Wagner
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-07-10

2.  A prospective study of the effect of video games on robotic surgery skills using the high-fidelity virtual reality RobotiX simulator.

Authors:  Andreas Pierre Hvolbek; Philip Mørkeberg Nilsson; Francesco Sanguedolce; Lars Lund
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2019-08-14

3.  Training benchmarks based on validated composite scores for the RobotiX robot-assisted surgery simulator on basic tasks.

Authors:  Erik Leijte; Linda Claassen; Elke Arts; Ivo de Blaauw; Camiel Rosman; Sanne M B I Botden
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-04-20

4.  Robot assisted versus laparoscopic suturing learning curve in a simulated setting.

Authors:  Erik Leijte; Ivo de Blaauw; Frans Van Workum; Camiel Rosman; Sanne Botden
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Assessment of validity evidence for the RobotiX robot assisted surgery simulator on advanced suturing tasks.

Authors:  Erik Leijte; Ivo de Blaauw; Camiel Rosman; Sanne M B I Botden
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.