| Literature DB >> 32650834 |
Susan Park1,2, Manali Vora2, Annemieke van Zante3, Joseph Humtsoe2, Hyun-Su Kim2, Sue Yom4, Shweta Agarwal5, Patrick Ha6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is the second most common malignancy of the salivary glands, accounting for ~ 1% of malignant tumors of the head and neck region and 10% of salivary gland neoplasms. Predicting the long-term outcomes of patients with ACC is still challenging, as reliable prognostic biomarkers are not available. Among salivary gland tumors, Myb overexpression is highly specific for ACC. In addition, the MYB-NF1B fusion translocation is a hallmark of ACC, and although the detection of this translocation does not appear to impact prognosis, the MYB-NF1B fusion is also implicated in MYB upregulation. Myb has recently been identified as an activator of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, and aberrant cytoplasmic expression of β-catenin has been observed in many salivary gland malignancies. In this study, we aim to analyze the impact of Myb and β-catenin expression on prognosis in ACC.Entities:
Keywords: Adenoid cystic carcinoma; Beta-catenin; Myb; Prognostic indicator
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32650834 PMCID: PMC7350736 DOI: 10.1186/s40463-020-00446-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ISSN: 1916-0208
Patient and tumor sample characteristics
| Variable | Overall | |
|---|---|---|
| Age at diagnosis (in years) | 55 (+/−15.1) | 0.3 |
| Sex | 0.6 | |
| Male | 25 (39%) | |
| Female | 39 (61%) | |
| Race a | 0.7 | |
| White | 40 (62.5%) | |
| Asian/PI | 17 (26.6%) | |
| African American and Other | 07 (10.9%) | |
| Smoking history b | 0.1 | |
| No | 37 (57.8%) | |
| Yes | 20 (31.3%) | |
| Missing | 07 (11.0%) | |
| Tumor stage c | 0.005 | |
| Early (Stage 2 or earlier) | 22 (31.3%) | |
| Late (Stage 3 or later) | 36 (56.3%) | |
| Missing | 08 (12.5%) | |
| Tumor location | 0.04 | |
| Major salivary gland | 19 (29.7%) | |
| Minor salivary gland | 45 (70.3%) | |
| Perineural invasion d | 0.1 | |
| Yes | 41 (64.1%) | |
| No | 11 (17.9%) | |
| Missing | 12 (18.8%) | |
| Margin status e | 0.2 | |
| Negative | 06 (09.4%) | |
| Positive | 45 (70.3%) | |
| Missing | 13 (20.3%) | |
| Dominant pattern | 0.3 | |
| Tubular/Cribriform | 43 (67.2%) | |
| Solid | 15 (20.3%) | |
| Missing | 08 (12.5%) | |
| Tumor necrosis | 13 (20.3%) | 0.3 |
| Treatment f | 0.3 | |
| Surgery | 17 (26.6%) | |
| Surgery +RT/C or RT/C alone | 47 (73.4%) | |
| Missing | 01 (1.34%) |
aThere were very few African American patients in our sample; thus, we combined them with people who disclosed their race as other, who were also few.
bPatients were categorized as smokers if they reported current or formerly smoking.
cTumor stages were determined clinically using TNM tumor classification.
dPerineural invasion was determined histologically.
eAll patients in our study received some treatment. We dichotomized them in two categories: those patients who received surgical treatment and those who underwent radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy (C) in addition to surgery or independent of surgical treatment.
Univariate Analysis: Outcomes of patients with ACC based on prognostic factors
| Overall survival a | N | HR* | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myb Staining (high vs. low) | 63 | 1.05 | 0.45–2.44 | 0.9 |
| Myb staining (present vs. absent) | 63 | 1.57 | 0.63–3.8 | 0.4 |
| Myb % tumor average (continuous) | 64 | 0.99 | 0.98–1.01 | 0.6 |
| Myb % tumor average (high vs. low) | 64 | 1.05 | 0.45–2.44 | 0.9 |
| ß-catenin cytoplasmic staining | 62 | 2.45 | 0.9–6.7 | 0.08 |
| Age at diagnosis | 64 | 1.03 | 1.0–1.1 | 0.03 |
| Race | 63 | 0.92 | 0.5–1.9 | 0.8 |
| Sex | 64 | 1.06 | 0.4–2.6 | 0.8 |
| Smoking history | 57 | 2.9 | 1.1–8.2 | 0.03 |
| Stage at diagnosis | 56 | 2.21 | 1.2–4.2 | 0.02 |
| Margin status | 51 | 1.62 | 0.21–12.5 | 0.6 |
| Dominant pattern | 56 | 1.64 | 0.6–4.4 | 0.3 |
| Treatment | 64 | 1.31 | 0.6–3.1 | 0.5 |
| Myb Staining (high vs. low) | 58 | 2.40 | 0.62–9.36 | 0.17 |
| Myb staining (present vs. absent) | 58 | 4.06 | 1.02–14.96 | 0.03 |
| Myb % tumor average (continuous) | 59 | 0.98 | 0.96–1.01 | 0.2 |
| Myb % tumor average (high vs. low) | 59 | 2.27 | 0.58–8.90 | 0.2 |
| ß-cat cytoplasmic staining | 57 | 1.35 | 0.39–4.67 | 0.64 |
| Age at diagnosis | 59 | 1.01 | 0.97–1.06 | 0.52 |
| Race | 58 | 0.36 | 0.08–1.57 | 0.18 |
| Sex | 59 | 0.46 | 0.09–2.22 | 0.34 |
| Smoking history | 54 | 0.72 | 0.15–3.59 | 0.69 |
| Stage at diagnosis | 51 | 1.62 | 0.79–3.32 | 0.19 |
| Margin status | 46 | – | – | – |
| Dominant pattern | 51 | – | – | – |
| Treatment | 59 | 1.22 | 0.34–4.37 | 0.76 |
| Myb Staining (high vs. low) a | 58 | 1.61 | 0.61–4.25 | 0.33 |
| Myb staining (present vs. absent) b | 58 | 1.05 | 0.36–3.05 | 0.91 |
| Myb % tumor average (continuous) | 59 | 1.01 | 0.19–1.02 | 0.23 |
| Myb % tumor average (high vs. low) | 59 | 0.50 | 0.18–1.36 | 0.16 |
| ß-cat cytoplasmic staining c | 57 | 1.88 | 0.64–5.54 | 0.25 |
| Age at diagnosis | 59 | 1.03 | 0.99–1.07 | 0.13 |
| Race | 58 | 1.22 | 0.55–2.74 | 0.62 |
| Sex | 59 | 0.43 | 0.14–1.35 | 0.15 |
| Smoking history | 54 | 1.99 | 0.67–5.95 | 0.22 |
| Stage at diagnosis | 51 | 3.31 | 1.02–10.69 | 0.04 |
| Margin status | 46 | – | – | – |
| Dominant pattern | 51 | 1.56 | 0.32,7.54 | 0.58 |
| Treatment | 59 | 1.08 | 0.33–3.54 | 0.89 |
The N in the table is presented as a separate column because each predictor had a differential amount of missing, and thus the sample size is not consistent among models fit to assess the different associations.
*: Hazard Ratios
** Follow-up information regarding overall survival, metastasis, and recurrence was missing for 9 patients, 11 patients, and 12 patients, respectively. Additionally, ß-cat staining information was unavailable for 2 patients, and Myb staining information was unavailable for 1 patient.
No estimates have been presented for margin status and dominant histologic pattern. All cases of recurrence and metastasis had a positive margin status. Given the small sample size and missing patient information for dominant histologic pattern, a survival model could not be fit to accurately analyze the data to provide conclusive results.
aThe average follow-up time for patients in whom overall survival was evaluated was 58.3 months, ranging from 0 to 303.1 months
bThe average follow-up time for patients in whom metastasis was evaluated was 51.5 months, ranging from 0 to 262.5 months
cThe average follow-up time for patients in whom overall recurrence was evaluated was 50 months, ranging from 0.07–244.5 months