Literature DB >> 32648192

Discrimination of Low-Energy Acetabular Fractures from Controls Using Computed Tomography-Based Bone Characteristics.

Robel K Gebre1, Jukka Hirvasniemi2, Iikka Lantto3,4, Simo Saarakkala5,4,6, Juhana Leppilahti3,4, Timo Jämsä5,4,6.   

Abstract

The incidence of low-energy acetabular fractures has increased. However, the structural factors for these fractures remain unclear. The objective of this study was to extract trabecular bone architecture and proximal femur geometry (PFG) measures from clinical computed tomography (CT) images to (1) identify possible structural risk factors of acetabular fractures, and (2) to discriminate fracture cases from controls using machine learning methods. CT images of 107 acetabular fracture subjects (25 females, 82 males) and 107 age-gender matched controls were examined. Three volumes of interest, one at the acetabulum and two at the femoral head, were extracted to calculate bone volume fraction (BV/TV), gray-level co-occurrence matrix and histogram of the gray values (GV). The PFG was defined by neck shaft angle and femoral neck axis length. Relationships between the variables were assessed by statistical mean comparisons and correlation analyses. Bayesian logistic regression and Elastic net machine learning models were implemented for classification. We found lower BV/TV at the femoral head (0.51 vs. 0.55, p = 0.012) and lower mean GV at both the acetabulum (98.81 vs. 115.33, p < 0.001) and femoral head (150.63 vs. 163.47, p = 0.005) of fracture subjects when compared to their matched controls. The trabeculae within the femoral heads of the acetabular fracture sides differed in structure, density and texture from the corresponding control sides of the fracture subjects. Moreover, the PFG and trabecular architectural variables, alone and in combination, were able to discriminate fracture cases from controls (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve 0.70 to 0.79). In conclusion, lower density in the acetabulum and femoral head with abnormal trabecular structure and texture at the femoral head, appear to be risk factors for low-energy acetabular fractures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetabular fracture; Computed tomography; Gray-level co-occurrence matrix; Machine learning; Trabecular structure

Year:  2020        PMID: 32648192     DOI: 10.1007/s10439-020-02563-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  30 in total

1.  A comparison of the texture of computed tomography and projection radiography images of vertebral trabecular bone using fractal signature and lacunarity.

Authors:  G Dougherty
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.242

2.  Age-related changes in femoral trabecular bone in arthrosis.

Authors:  G J Crane; N L Fazzalari; I H Parkinson; B Vernon-Roberts
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1990-10

3.  Analysis of trabecular bone structure with multidetector spiral computed tomography in a simulated soft-tissue environment.

Authors:  Jan S Bauer; Thomas M Link; Andrew Burghardt; Tobias D Henning; Dirk Mueller; Sharmila Majumdar; Sven Prevrhal
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Lacunarity analysis of spatial pattern in CT images of vertebral trabecular bone for assessing osteoporosis.

Authors:  Geoffrey Dougherty; Geoffrey M Henebry
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  Functional architecture of the nasopharyngeal tonsil.

Authors:  T Fujiyoshi; T Watanabe; I Ichimiya; G Mogi
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  1989 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.808

6.  Structural risk factors for low-energy acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Robel K Gebre; Jukka Hirvasniemi; Iikka Lantto; Simo Saarakkala; Juhana Leppilahti; Timo Jämsä
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Acetabular Fractures in the Senior Population- Epidemiology, Mortality and Treatments.

Authors:  Reza Firoozabadi; William W Cross; James C Krieg; Milton L Chip Routt
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2017-03

8.  Opportunistic CT Screening for Osteoporosis in Patients With Pelvic and Acetabular Trauma: Technique and Potential Clinical Impact.

Authors:  David Donohue; Summer Decker; Jonathan Ford; Robert Foley; Kirstin Dunbar; Todd Kumm; Kyle Achors; Hassan Mir
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Heterogeneity of bone microstructure in the femoral head in patients with osteoporosis: an ex vivo HR-pQCT study.

Authors:  Ko Chiba; Andrew J Burghardt; Makoto Osaki; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Long-term functional outcome after a low-energy hip fracture in elderly patients.

Authors:  Stijn G C J de Joode; Pishtiwan H S Kalmet; Audrey A A Fiddelers; Martijn Poeze; Taco J Blokhuis
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2019-04-11
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Applications of Machine Learning in Bone and Mineral Research.

Authors:  Sung Hye Kong; Chan Soo Shin
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab (Seoul)       Date:  2021-10-21

2.  Detecting hip osteoarthritis on clinical CT: a deep learning application based on 2-D summation images derived from CT.

Authors:  R K Gebre; J Hirvasniemi; R A van der Heijden; I Lantto; S Saarakkala; J Leppilahti; T Jämsä
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 5.071

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.