Janina Krell-Roesch1, Jeremy A Syrjanen2, Maria Vassilaki2, Val J Lowe3, Prashanthi Vemuri3, Michelle M Mielke4, Mary M Machulda5, Gorazd B Stokin6, Teresa J Christianson2, Walter K Kremers2, Clifford R Jack3, David S Knopman7, Ronald C Petersen4, Yonas E Geda8. 1. Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN; Institute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany. 2. Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN. 3. Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN. 4. Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN. 5. Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN; Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN. 6. International Clinical Research Center/St. Anne Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic. 7. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN. 8. Department of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ. Electronic address: jonasgeda@gmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The authors conducted a prospective cohort study to examine the risk of incident mild cognitive impairment (MCI) as predicted by baseline neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) and brain regional glucose metabolic dysfunction. METHODS: About 1,363 cognitively unimpaired individuals (52.8% males) aged ≥50 years were followed for a median of 4.8 years to the outcome of incident MCI. NPS were assessed using Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories and Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire. Glucose hypometabolism was measured by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and defined as standardized uptake value ratio ≤ 1.47 in regions typically affected in Alzheimer disease. Cox proportional hazards models were adjusted for age, sex, education, and APOE ε4 status. RESULTS: Participants with regional glucose hypometabolism and depression (Beck Depression Inventory-II ≥13) had a more than threefold increased risk of incident MCI (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 3.66 [1.75, 7.65], p <0.001, χ2 = 11.83, degree of freedom [df] = 1) as compared to the reference group (normal regional glucose metabolism and no depression), and the risk was also significantly elevated (7.21 [3.54, 14.7], p <0.001, χ2 = 29.68, df = 1) for participants with glucose hypometabolism and anxiety (Beck Anxiety Inventory ≥10). Having glucose hypometabolism and ≥1 NPS (3.74 [2.40, 5.82], p <0.001, χ2 = 34.13, df = 1) or ≥2 NPS (3.89 [2.20, 6.86], p <0.001, χ2 = 21.92, df = 1) increased the risk of incident MCI by more than three times, and having ≥3 NPS increased the risk by more than four times (4.12 [2.03, 8.37], p <0.001, χ2 = 15.39, df = 1). CONCLUSION: Combined presence of NPS with regional glucose hypometabolism is associated with an increased risk of incident MCI, with fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography appearing to be a stronger driving force of cognitive decline than NPS.
OBJECTIVE: The authors conducted a prospective cohort study to examine the risk of incident mild cognitive impairment (MCI) as predicted by baseline neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) and brain regional glucose metabolic dysfunction. METHODS: About 1,363 cognitively unimpaired individuals (52.8% males) aged ≥50 years were followed for a median of 4.8 years to the outcome of incident MCI. NPS were assessed using Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories and Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire. Glucose hypometabolism was measured by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and defined as standardized uptake value ratio ≤ 1.47 in regions typically affected in Alzheimer disease. Cox proportional hazards models were adjusted for age, sex, education, and APOE ε4 status. RESULTS: Participants with regional glucose hypometabolism and depression (Beck Depression Inventory-II ≥13) had a more than threefold increased risk of incident MCI (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 3.66 [1.75, 7.65], p <0.001, χ2 = 11.83, degree of freedom [df] = 1) as compared to the reference group (normal regional glucose metabolism and no depression), and the risk was also significantly elevated (7.21 [3.54, 14.7], p <0.001, χ2 = 29.68, df = 1) for participants with glucose hypometabolism and anxiety (Beck Anxiety Inventory ≥10). Having glucose hypometabolism and ≥1 NPS (3.74 [2.40, 5.82], p <0.001, χ2 = 34.13, df = 1) or ≥2 NPS (3.89 [2.20, 6.86], p <0.001, χ2 = 21.92, df = 1) increased the risk of incident MCI by more than three times, and having ≥3 NPS increased the risk by more than four times (4.12 [2.03, 8.37], p <0.001, χ2 = 15.39, df = 1). CONCLUSION: Combined presence of NPS with regional glucose hypometabolism is associated with an increased risk of incident MCI, with fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography appearing to be a stronger driving force of cognitive decline than NPS.
Authors: N Tzourio-Mazoyer; B Landeau; D Papathanassiou; F Crivello; O Etard; N Delcroix; B Mazoyer; M Joliot Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: K Herholz; E Salmon; D Perani; J C Baron; V Holthoff; L Frölich; P Schönknecht; K Ito; R Mielke; E Kalbe; G Zündorf; X Delbeuck; O Pelati; D Anchisi; F Fazio; N Kerrouche; B Desgranges; F Eustache; B Beuthien-Baumann; C Menzel; J Schröder; T Kato; Y Arahata; M Henze; W D Heiss Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Jennifer L St Sauver; Brandon R Grossardt; Cynthia L Leibson; Barbara P Yawn; L Joseph Melton; Walter A Rocca Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Jennifer R Gatchel; Nancy J Donovan; Joseph J Locascio; J Alex Becker; Dorene M Rentz; Reisa A Sperling; Keith A Johnson; Gad A Marshall Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2017-01-04 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Clifford R Jack; Heather J Wiste; Stephen D Weigand; Terry M Therneau; Val J Lowe; David S Knopman; Jeffrey L Gunter; Matthew L Senjem; David T Jones; Kejal Kantarci; Mary M Machulda; Michelle M Mielke; Rosebud O Roberts; Prashanthi Vemuri; Denise A Reyes; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2016-09-30 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Edo Richard; Christiane Reitz; Lawrence H Honig; Nicole Schupf; Ming X Tang; Jennifer J Manly; Richard Mayeux; Devangere Devanand; José A Luchsinger Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Clifford R Jack; Val J Lowe; Matthew L Senjem; Stephen D Weigand; Bradley J Kemp; Maria M Shiung; David S Knopman; Bradley F Boeve; William E Klunk; Chester A Mathis; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Brain Date: 2008-02-07 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Rosebud O Roberts; Yonas E Geda; David S Knopman; Ruth H Cha; V Shane Pankratz; Bradley F Boeve; Robert J Ivnik; Eric G Tangalos; Ronald C Petersen; Walter A Rocca Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2008-02-07 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Antoine Hone-Blanchet; Botond Antal; Liam McMahon; Andrew Lithen; Nathan A Smith; Steven Stufflebeam; Yi-Fen Yen; Alexander Lin; Bruce G Jenkins; Lilianne R Mujica-Parodi; Eva-Maria Ratai Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2022-08-22 Impact factor: 8.294
Authors: Amelia Strom; Leonardo Iaccarino; Lauren Edwards; Orit H Lesman-Segev; David N Soleimani-Meigooni; Julie Pham; Suzanne L Baker; Susan M Landau; William J Jagust; Bruce L Miller; Howard J Rosen; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini; Gil D Rabinovici; Renaud La Joie Journal: Brain Date: 2022-04-18 Impact factor: 15.255