| Literature DB >> 32646455 |
David W Russ1,2, Kalina Dimova3,4, Emily Morris4, Marguerite Pacheco4, Sean M Garvey5,6, Stylianos P Scordilis3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dietary fish oil (DFO) has been identified as a micronutrient supplement with the potential to improve musculoskeletal health in old age. Few data are available for effects of DFO on muscle contractility, despite the significant negative impact of muscle weakness on age-related health outcomes. Accordingly, the effects of a DFO intervention on the contractile function and proteomic profile of adult and aged in an animal model of aging were investigated.Entities:
Keywords: Aging; Diet; Omega-3; Proteomics; Sarcopenia; Skeletal muscle
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32646455 PMCID: PMC7350698 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-020-01333-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Antibodies used in immunoblots
| Protein | Supplier and Catalog Number | Primary Dilution | Secondary Dilution | Uniprot Accession Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creatine Kinase - M | PT1 15,891–1-AP | 1:10000 | 1:100004 | P00563 |
| Triosephosphate Isomerase - 1 | PT1 10,713–1-AP | 1:4000 | 1:50004 | P00939 |
| Beta-Enolase | AB2 ab96334 | 1:2500 | 1:50004 | P13929 |
| Pyruvate Kinase – M2 | PT1 60,268–1-Ig | 1:10000 | 1:100005 | P52480 |
| NADH Dehydrogenase | PT1 15,301–1-AP | 1:2000 | 1:50004 | P19404 |
| PARK7/DJ1 | AB2 ab18257 | 1:2000 | 1:50004 | Q99497 |
| Parvalbumin | AB2 ab11427 | 1:2500 | 1:50004 | P02625 |
| GAPDH | MS3 MAB374 | 1:25000 | 1:250005 | P46406 |
1Proteintech
2Abcam
3Millipore-Sigma
4Millipore-Sigma 401,393 [goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP]
5SantaCruz sc-2005 [goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP]
Body Mass and Food Consumption
| Adult | Aged | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ctl ( | DFO ( | Ctl ( | DFO ( | |
| Week 1 Body mass (g) | 491.0 ± 18.0 | 500.8 ± 14.5 | 544.5 ± 19.2 | 553.0 ± 23.3 |
| Week 8 Body mass (g) | 517.0 ± 19.4 | 535.0 ± 16.8 | 567.5 ± 19.0 | 578.0 ± 19.9 |
| Week 1 Food disappearance (g/week) | 125.1 ± 6.8 | 132.3 ± 14.4 | 136.7 ± 10.7 | 138.3 ± 6.8 |
| Week 8 Food disappearance (g/week) | 116.7 ± 4.1‡ | 120.4 ± 4.7† | 110.8 ± 8.3† | 114.3 ± 4.8† |
| Week 1 Food disappearance/body mass | 0.264 ± 0.006 | 0.254 ± 0.006 | 0.251 ± 0.019 | 0.251 ± 0.012 |
| Week 8 Food disappearance/body mass | 0.227 ± 0.013 | 0.230 ± 0.010 | 0.195 ± 0.011 | 0.199 ± 0.009 |
Data represent means ± SE
T significant effect of time, A significant effect of age, X significant age X time interaction
† = significantly different from week 1 P < 0.050
‡ = significantly different from Week 1, P < 0.010
Muscle Function and Morphology
| Adult | Aged | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ctl ( | DFO ( | Ctl ( | DFO ( | |
| Twitch Force (N) | 4.36 ± 0.32 | 5.53 ± 0.38 | 3.78 ± 0.40 | 4.04 ± 0.35 |
| Tetanic Force (N) | 12.76 ± 0.44 | 14.87 ± 0.88 | 10.02 ± 0.86 | 11.65 ± 0.79 |
| Twitch Muscle Quality (N/cm2) | 5.01 ± 0.26 | 6.42 ± 0.51 | 5.35 ± 0.49 | 5.30 ± 0.40 |
| Tetanic Muscle Quality (N/cm2) | 14.68 ± 0.47 | 17.25 ± 1.14 | 13.82 ± 0.60 | 15.28 ± 0.76 |
| Muscle Mass (g) | 1.33 ± 0.05 | 1.35 ± 0.05 | 1.15 ± 0.07 | 1.19 ± 0.04 |
| Muscle CSA (cm2) | 0.87 ± 0.03 | 0.87 ± 0.03 | 0.71 ± 0.04 | 0.76 ± 0.03 |
| TPT (ms) | 31.8 ± 1.7 | 35.6 ± 2.5 | 35.5 ± 2.8 | 30.8 ± 1.3 |
| 1/2 RT (ms) | 24.3 ± 2.1 | 30.3 ± 3.5 | 40.3 ± 9.6 | 21.0 ± 0.8 |
| RFD (mN/ms) | 311.7 ± 26.4 | 340.4 ± 70.9 | 252.0 ± 27.9 | 327.8 ± 30.8 |
| RFR (mN/ms) | 271.3 ± 19.1 | 270.2 ± 31.5 | 149.1 ± 37.2 | 236.9 ± 9.2 |
| norm RFD (%/ms) | 2.5 ± 0.2 | 2.3 ± 0.2 | 2.7 ± 0.3 | 2.9 ± 0.4 |
| norm RFR (%/ms) | 2.2 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 2.0 ± 0.2 |
| Twitch:Tetanus | 0.34 ± 0.01 | 0.37 ± 0.04 | 0.39 ± 0.03 | 0.34 ± 0.02 |
| 32.5 ± 0.1a | 32.8 ± 0.3 | 34.5 ± 0.1 | 33.0 ± 0.3 | |
Data represent means ± SE
asignificantly different from Aged Ctl
A significant effect of age, D significant effect of diet, X significant interaction
CSA cross-sectional area, TPT time to peak twitch force; ½ RT half-relaxation time of twitch force, RFD rate of tetanic force development, RFR rate of tetanic force relaxation; norm, RFD rate of tetanic force development normalized to peak tetanic force, RFR rate of tetanic force relaxation normalized to peak tetanic force, twitch:tetanus ratio of peak twitch to peak tetanic force, lopt optimal length for twitch force production
Fig. 1Mean (Ad, n = 14 (7 Ctl, 7 FO); Ag, n = 12 (6 Ctl, 6 FO), ±SE) bilateral forepaw grip strength normalized to body mass. Pre = prior to initiating dietary intervention; Post = at completion of 8-wk dietary intervention
Fig. 2Differential protein expression as a result of aging and DFO. Proteins that differed in expression by greater than or equal to two-fold from the respective control based on quantitative digital 2D gel analyses were identified by nanoLC mass spectrometry and grouped by general function. Red indicates a 2-fold or more reduction, green indicates a 2-fold or more increase. NC = 2-fold change was not observed
Fig. 3a) Mean (Ad, n = 14 (7 Ctl, 7 FO); Ag, n = 12 (6 Ctl, 6 FO), ± SE) protein abundance (arbitrary units, A.U.), normalized to Adult Ctl diet group, by Western blot for CK, TPI, Beta Enolase, PK, NADHD, DJ1 and Parvalbumin. Solid line = Significant main effect of age; Dashed line = Significant main effect of diet; Dotted Line = Significant age X diet interaction; * = significantly different from Ad Ctl group; ^ = Significantly different from Ag FO group; † = Significantly different from Ag Ctl Group. b) Representative immunoblots with the identical standard for corresponding proteins in A along with the corresponding GAPDH loading blots
Fig. 4Scatterplots showing relationships between NADHD abundance (arbitrary units, A.U.) and muscle functional and morphological parameters, with lines of best fit. a) Ag group NADHD vs. Tetanic Force (rs = − 0.648, P = 0.043). b) Ad group, NADHD vs. Muscle Mass (rs = 0.503, P = 0.067)