| Literature DB >> 32643104 |
Robbert Ramak1, Gian-Battista Chierchia2, Gaetano Paparella1, Cinzia Monaco1, Vincenzo Miraglia1, Federico Cecchini1, Antonio Bisignani1, Joerelle Mojica1, Maysam Al Housari1, Dimitrios Sofianos1, Shuichiro Kazawa1, Ingrid Overeinder1, Gezim Bala1, Erwin Ströker1, Juan Sieira1, Thiago Guimaraes Osorio1, Pedro Brugada1, Carlo de Asmundis1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the new high-resolution mapping algorithm SuperMap (Acutus Medical, CA, USA) in identifying and guiding ablation in the setting of regular atrial tachycardias following index atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation.Entities:
Keywords: Atrial tachycardia; Contact force ablation; Dipole density noncontact mapping; LSI; SuperMap algorithm; Unipolar signals
Year: 2020 PMID: 32643104 PMCID: PMC8195776 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-020-00808-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol ISSN: 1383-875X Impact factor: 1.900
Fig. 1Anatomy reconstruction panels (a), (b), and (c) represent the build out of the LA anatomy with the ultrasound enabled AcQMap catheter. The green vectors on the map are originating from the 48 ultrasound transducers on the AcQMap catheter. The vectors are proportional to the distances travelled from the transducers towards the endocardial surface. Panel (d) represents the completed LA anatomy which will serve to project upon the electrical activation of the LA
Fig. 2Overview workflow SuperMap. Step 1: AcQMap catheter hovering across the chamber of interest based on visual data acquisition workflow. Step 2: Automatic Beat Grouping based on uni- and bipolar reference signals that share similar morphology. Step 3: Automatic map creation associated with different beat groups are visualized for conduction wave front analysis
Baseline characteristics of the study population
| Age (years) | 67.6 ± 7.6 |
| Gender (male) | 6 (85.7%) |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 25.5 ± 2.2 |
| Hypertension (%) | 4 (57.1%) |
| Diabetes (%) | 2 (28.6%) |
| Dyslipidemia (%) | 4 (57.1%) |
| Antiarrhythmic drugs (%) | 7 (100%) |
| Left ventricular ejection fraction (%) | 52.9% ± 4.7 |
Main procedural characteristics of the study population
| Mean Anatomy acquisition (s) | 166.0 ± 26.9 |
| Mean Mapping time (s) | 326.6 ± 54.8 |
| Mean total mapping time (m) | 8.02 ± 1.0 |
| Mean EGM points | 5859.7 ± 4348.5 |
| Mean Fluoroscopy time (min) | 13.6 ± 9.4 |
| Mean application/ablation points | 30.0 ± 25.0 |
| Mean ablation time (min) | 18.2 ± 12.5 |
| Mean procedural duration time (min) | 56.4 ± 12.1 |
| Time to Redo (months) | 25.8 ± 14.4 |
Fig. 3Focal AT: Panels (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f) represent the electrical activation projected on the LA anatomy in different time steps throughout the full CL of the focal AT origination form underneath the RSPV (yellow arrow is starting point). All panels show a RAO view of the LA
Fig. 4Mitral isthmus dependent atypical flutter: Panels (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f) represent the electrical activation projected on the LA anatomy in different time steps throughout the full CL of the counter clock wise mitral isthmus dependent AFL. Yellow arrow is indicating the wave front. All panels show a LAO view of the LA
Tachycardia characteristics
| Type of arrhythmia | Localization | CL (ms) | Ablation target site |
|---|---|---|---|
| AFL | LA | 420 | Mitral isthmus line |
| AT | LA | 270 | Anteroseptal RSPV |
| AFL | LA | 240 | Mitral isthmus line + epicardial CS |
| AT | LA | 400 | Posterior in proximity LIPV |
| AFL | RA | 320 | Critical isthmus between crista terminalis and atriostomy. |
| AFL | LA | 270 | Mitral isthmus line |
| AT | LA | 235 | Interatrial septum in proximity of fossa ovalis |