BACKGROUND: Comprehensive and efficient assessments are necessary for clinical care and research in chronic diseases. Our objective was to assess the implementation of a technology-enabled tool in MS practice. METHOD: We analyzed prospectively collected longitudinal data from routine multiple sclerosis (MS) visits between September 2015 and May 2018. The MS Performance Test, comprising patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and neuroperformance tests (NPTs) self-administered using a tablet, was integrated into routine care. Descriptive statistics, Spearman correlations, and linear mixed-effect models were used to examine the implementation process and relationship between patient characteristics and completion of assessments. RESULTS: A total of 8022 follow-up visits from 4199 patients (median age 49.9 [40.2-58.8] years, 32.1% progressive course, and median disease duration 13.6 [5.9-22.3] years) were analyzed. By the end of integration, the tablet version of the Timed 25-Foot Walk was obtained in 89.0% of patients and the 9-Hole Peg Test in 94.8% compared with 74.2% and 64.3%, respectively before implementation. The greatest increase in data capture occurred in processing speed and low-contrast acuity assessments (0% prior vs 78.4% and 36.7%, respectively, following implementation). Four PROMs were administered in 41%-98% of patients compared with a single depression questionnaire with a previous capture rate of 70.6%. Completion rates and time required to complete each NPT improved with subsequent visits. Younger age and lower disability scores were associated with shorter completion time and higher completion rates. CONCLUSIONS: Integration of technology-enabled data capture in routine clinical practice allows acquisition of comprehensive standardized data for use in patient care and clinical research.
BACKGROUND: Comprehensive and efficient assessments are necessary for clinical care and research in chronic diseases. Our objective was to assess the implementation of a technology-enabled tool in MS practice. METHOD: We analyzed prospectively collected longitudinal data from routine multiple sclerosis (MS) visits between September 2015 and May 2018. The MS Performance Test, comprising patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and neuroperformance tests (NPTs) self-administered using a tablet, was integrated into routine care. Descriptive statistics, Spearman correlations, and linear mixed-effect models were used to examine the implementation process and relationship between patient characteristics and completion of assessments. RESULTS: A total of 8022 follow-up visits from 4199 patients (median age 49.9 [40.2-58.8] years, 32.1% progressive course, and median disease duration 13.6 [5.9-22.3] years) were analyzed. By the end of integration, the tablet version of the Timed 25-Foot Walk was obtained in 89.0% of patients and the 9-Hole Peg Test in 94.8% compared with 74.2% and 64.3%, respectively before implementation. The greatest increase in data capture occurred in processing speed and low-contrast acuity assessments (0% prior vs 78.4% and 36.7%, respectively, following implementation). Four PROMs were administered in 41%-98% of patients compared with a single depression questionnaire with a previous capture rate of 70.6%. Completion rates and time required to complete each NPT improved with subsequent visits. Younger age and lower disability scores were associated with shorter completion time and higher completion rates. CONCLUSIONS: Integration of technology-enabled data capture in routine clinical practice allows acquisition of comprehensive standardized data for use in patient care and clinical research.
Authors: J A Cohen; G R Cutter; J S Fischer; A D Goodman; F R Heidenreich; M F Kooijmans; A W Sandrock; R A Rudick; J H Simon; N A Simonian; E C Tsao; J N Whitaker Journal: Neurology Date: 2002-09-10 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Stephen M Rao; Genna Losinski; Lyla Mourany; David Schindler; Bernadett Mamone; Christine Reece; Danielle Kemeny; Sridar Narayanan; Deborah M Miller; Francois Bethoux; Robert A Bermel; Richard Rudick; Jay Alberts Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2017-01-12 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Maria A Rocca; Maria P Amato; Nicola De Stefano; Christian Enzinger; Jeroen J Geurts; Iris-K Penner; Alex Rovira; James F Sumowski; Paola Valsasina; Massimo Filippi Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2015-02-04 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: J A Cohen; G R Cutter; J S Fischer; A D Goodman; F R Heidenreich; A J Jak; J E Kniker; M F Kooijmans; J M Lull; A W Sandrock; J H Simon; N A Simonian; J N Whitaker Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2001-06
Authors: David Cella; William Riley; Arthur Stone; Nan Rothrock; Bryce Reeve; Susan Yount; Dagmar Amtmann; Rita Bode; Daniel Buysse; Seung Choi; Karon Cook; Robert Devellis; Darren DeWalt; James F Fries; Richard Gershon; Elizabeth A Hahn; Jin-Shei Lai; Paul Pilkonis; Dennis Revicki; Matthias Rose; Kevin Weinfurt; Ron Hays Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2010-08-04 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: G R Cutter; M L Baier; R A Rudick; D L Cookfair; J S Fischer; J Petkau; K Syndulko; B G Weinshenker; J P Antel; C Confavreux; G W Ellison; F Lublin; A E Miller; S M Rao; S Reingold; A Thompson; E Willoughby Journal: Brain Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Carmen Tur; Marcello Moccia; Frederik Barkhof; Jeremy Chataway; Jaume Sastre-Garriga; Alan J Thompson; Olga Ciccarelli Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2018-01-12 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: R A Rudick; C H Polman; J A Cohen; M K Walton; A E Miller; C Confavreux; F D Lublin; M Hutchinson; P W O'Connor; S R Schwid; L J Balcer; F Lynn; M A Panzara; A W Sandrock Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: S A Gauthier; B I Glanz; M Mandel; Antonios Tsagkaropoulos; Mohit Neema; James Stankiewicz; Ashish Arora; Yang Duan; Zsuzsanna Liptak; Svetlana Egorova; Guy J Buckle; Rohit Bakshi; C R G Guttmann; S J Khoury; H L Weiner Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2009-05-09 Impact factor: 3.181
Authors: Richard A Rudick; Deborah Miller; Francois Bethoux; Stephen M Rao; Jar-Chi Lee; Darlene Stough; Christine Reece; David Schindler; Bernadett Mamone; Jay Alberts Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2014-06-30 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Mandy Miller Koop; Anson B Rosenfeldt; Kelsey Owen; Amanda L Penko; Matthew C Streicher; Alec Albright; Jay L Alberts Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2022-03-04 Impact factor: 3.576