Literature DB >> 10355672

Development of a multiple sclerosis functional composite as a clinical trial outcome measure.

G R Cutter1, M L Baier, R A Rudick, D L Cookfair, J S Fischer, J Petkau, K Syndulko, B G Weinshenker, J P Antel, C Confavreux, G W Ellison, F Lublin, A E Miller, S M Rao, S Reingold, A Thompson, E Willoughby.   

Abstract

The primary clinical outcome measure for evaluating multiple sclerosis in clinical trials has been Kurtzke's expanded disability status scale (EDSS). New therapies appear to favourably impact the course of multiple sclerosis and render continued use of placebo control groups more difficult. Consequently, future trials are likely to compare active treatment groups which will most probably require increased sample sizes in order to detect therapeutic efficacy. Because more responsive outcome measures will be needed for active arm comparison studies, the National Multiple Sclerosis Society's Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis appointed a Task Force that was charged with developing improved clinical outcome measures. This Task Force acquired contemporary clinical trial and historical multiple sclerosis data for meta-analyses of primary and secondary outcome assessments to provide a basis for recommending a new outcome measure. A composite measure encompassing the major clinical dimensions of arm, leg and cognitive function was identified and termed the multiple sclerosis functional composite (MSFC). The MSFC consists of three objective quantitative tests of neurological function which are easy to administer. Change in this MSFC over the first year of observation predicted subsequent change in the EDSS, suggesting that the MSFC is more sensitive to change than the EDSS. This paper provides details concerning the development and testing of the MSFC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10355672     DOI: 10.1093/brain/122.5.871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  309 in total

1.  Crowdsourced analysis of clinical trial data to predict amyotrophic lateral sclerosis progression.

Authors:  Robert Küffner; Neta Zach; Raquel Norel; Johann Hawe; David Schoenfeld; Liuxia Wang; Guang Li; Lilly Fang; Lester Mackey; Orla Hardiman; Merit Cudkowicz; Alexander Sherman; Gokhan Ertaylan; Moritz Grosse-Wentrup; Torsten Hothorn; Jules van Ligtenberg; Jakob H Macke; Timm Meyer; Bernhard Schölkopf; Linh Tran; Rubio Vaughan; Gustavo Stolovitzky; Melanie L Leitner
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Intrathecal effects of daclizumab treatment of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  B Bielekova; N Richert; M L Herman; J Ohayon; T A Waldmann; H McFarland; R Martin; G Blevins
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Compensatory cortical activation observed by fMRI during a cognitive task at the earliest stage of MS.

Authors:  Bertrand Audoin; Danielle Ibarrola; Jean-Philippe Ranjeva; Sylviane Confort-Gouny; Irina Malikova; André Ali-Chérif; Jean Pelletier; Patrick Cozzone
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  Evaluation of therapy of X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy.

Authors:  Hugo W Moser; Ali Fatemi; Kathleen Zackowski; Seth Smith; Xavier Golay; Larry Muenz; Gerald Raymond
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 5.  Management of secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Gavin Giovannoni
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.749

6.  Magnetic resonance study of the influence of tissue damage and cortical reorganization on PASAT performance at the earliest stage of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Bertrand Audoin; My Van Au Duong; Jean-Philippe Ranjeva; Danielle Ibarrola; Irina Malikova; Sylviane Confort-Gouny; Elisabeth Soulier; Patrick Viout; André Ali-Chérif; Jean Pelletier; Patrick J Cozzone
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Overcoming the clinical-MR imaging paradox of multiple sclerosis: MR imaging data assessed with a random forest approach.

Authors:  K Kacar; M A Rocca; M Copetti; S Sala; S Mesaros; T Stosic Opincal; D Caputo; M Absinta; J Drulovic; V S Kostic; G Comi; M Filippi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 8.  4-Aminopyridine for symptomatic treatment of multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Henrik Boye Jensen; Mads Ravnborg; Ulrik Dalgas; Egon Stenager
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.570

9.  Plantarflexor weakness negatively impacts walking in persons with multiple sclerosis more than plantarflexor spasticity.

Authors:  Joanne M Wagner; Theodore R Kremer; Linda R Van Dillen; Robert T Naismith
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Validity of the Verbal Concept Attainment Test in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Ryan Mulligan; Michael R Basso; Lily Lau; Bradley Reynolds; Douglas M Whiteside; Dennis Combs; Robert A Bornstein
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 2.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.