| Literature DB >> 32640759 |
Bartłomiej Pochwat1, Helena Domin2, Anna Rafało-Ulińska1, Bernadeta Szewczyk1, Gabriel Nowak1,3.
Abstract
Clinical and preclinical studies indicate that zinc (Zn) is an essential factor in the development and treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). Conventional monoamine-based antidepressants mobilize zinc in the blood and brain of depressed patients as well as rodents. N-methyl-D-aspartate acid receptor (NMDAR) antagonists exhibit antidepressant-like activity. However, not much is known about the antidepressant efficacy of NMDAR antagonists in zinc-deficient (ZnD) animals. We evaluated the antidepressant-like activity of two NMDAR antagonists (ketamine; global NMDAR antagonist and Ro 25-6981 (Ro); selective antagonist of the GluN2B NMDAR subunit) in ZnD rats using the forced swim test (FST) and sucrose intake test (SIT). A single dose of either Ro 25-6981 or ketamine normalized depressive-like behaviors in ZnD rats; however, Ro was effective in both tests, while ketamine was only effective in the FST. Additionally, we investigated the mechanism of antidepressant action of Ro at the molecular (analysis of protein expression by Western blotting) and anatomical (density of dendritic spines by Golgi Cox-staining) levels. ZnD rats exhibited decreased phosphorylation of the p70S6K protein, and enhanced density of dendritic spines in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) compared to control rats. The antidepressant-like activity of Ro was associated with the increased phosphorylation of p70S6K and ERK in the PFC. In summary, single doses of the NMDAR antagonists ketamine and Ro exhibited antidepressant-like activity in the ZnD animal model of depression. Animals were only deprived of Zn for 4 weeks and the biochemical effects of Zn deprivation and Ro were investigated in the PFC and hippocampus. The shorter duration of dietary Zn restriction may be a limitation of the study. However, future studies with longer durations of dietary Zn restriction, as well as the investigation of multiple brain structures, are encouraged as a supplement to this study.Entities:
Keywords: Ro 25-6981; depression; ketamine; zinc deficiency
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32640759 PMCID: PMC7369754 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21134791
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1The effect of a single dose of ketamine (Ket) and Ro 25-6981 in the forced swim test (FST) in rats subjected to zinc deficiency. (A) Experimental schedule of drug treatments and behavioral test. Ketamine (10 mg/kg; i.p.), n = 8–10 (B) and Ro 25-6981 (10 mg/kg; i.p.), n = 8–9 (C) were administered 60 min before the FST. All data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Newman–Keuls multiple comparisons test. Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. Two way ANOVA for ketamine showed non-significant interaction [F (1, 32) = 1.794, p = 0.1899], the significant effect of ZnD [F (1, 32) = 35.4, p < 0.0001], and the non-significant effect of ketamine [F (1, 32) = 0.6554, p = 0.4242]. Two way ANOVA for Ro 25-6981 showed non-significant interaction [F (1, 31) = 0.1005, p = 0.7534], the significant effect of ZnD [F (1, 31) = 15.38, p = 0.0005], and the significant effect of Ro 25–6981 [F (1, 31) = 15.94, p = 0.0004]. * p < 0.05 vs. ZnA + Veh; *** p < 0.001 vs ZnA + Veh; #### p < 0.0001 vs. ZnD + Veh; ## p < 0.01 vs. ZnD + Veh. ZnA—zinc adequate diet; ZnD—zinc deficient diet.
Effect of zinc deficient diet (ZnD) and Ro 25–6981 and ketamine treatment on the locomotor activity of rats.
|
|
|
|
| ZnA + NaCl | 100 ± 9.28 | |
| ZnA + Ro 25–6981 | 137.8 ± 39.01 | |
| ZnD + NaCl | 70.76 ± 5.03 | |
| ZnD + Ro 25–6981 | 124.56 ± 12.3 |
Figure 2The effect of a single dose of ketamine (Ket) and Ro 25–6981 on sucrose intake in rats subjected to zinc deficiency. (A) Experimental schedule of drug treatments and behavioral test; (B) ketamine (10 mg/kg; i.p.) and Ro 25–6981 (10 mg/kg; i.p.) were administered 60 min before the test. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and the Newman–Keuls multiple comparisons test. Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. Two-way ANOVA showed significant interaction [F (2, 44) = 5.555; p = 0.0071], the significant effect of ZnD [F (2, 44) = 7.268; p = 0.0019] and the non-significant effect of treatment [F (1, 44) = 0.6351, p = 0.4298]. * p < 0.05 vs. ZnA + Veh; ### p < 0.001 vs. ZnD + Veh (n = 8–9).
Figure 3The effect of the administration of single dose of Ro 25–6981 on the expression of pS6K/S6K, p-ERK/ERK, synapsin I and GluA1 subunit of AMPA receptors in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and hippocampus (Hp) of rats subjected to ZnD, n = 8–10; (A) experimental schedule; (B) representative blots for PFC; (C–F) protein expression in PFC; (G) representative blots for Hp, * images from the same part of the membrane; (H–K) protein expression in Hp. All data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and the Newman–Keuls multiple comparisons test. All values are expressed as mean ±S.E.M. PFC: (B) pS6K/S6K: interaction [F(1,31) = 17.18, p = 0.0002]; effect of Ro 25–6981 [F (1, 31) = 6.335, p = 0.0172]; effect of ZnD [F (1, 31) = 0.3069, p = 0.5836]; * p < 0.05 vs. ZnA, ### p < 0.001; (C) p-ERK/ERK: interaction [(1, 32) = 0.0063, p = 0.9372]; effect of Ro 25–6981 [F (1, 32) = 14.76, p = 0.0005]; effect of ZnD [F (1, 32) = 0.09003, p = 0.7661]; * p < 0.05 vs. ZnA, # p < 0.05 vs. ZnD; (D) Synapsin I: interaction [F (1, 31) = 1.981, p = 0.1692]; effect of Ro 25–6981: [F (1, 31) = 1.411, p = 0.2439], effect of ZnD [F (1, 31) = 0.3487, p = 0.5591]; (E) GluA1: Interaction [F (1, 36) = 0.07359, p = 0.7877]; effect of Ro 25–6981 [F (1, 36) = 0.2268, p = 0.6368], effect of ZnD [F (1, 36) = 0.01161, p = 0.9148]; Hp: (H) pS6K/S6K: interaction [F (1, 32) = 1.979 × 10−6, p = 0.9989]; effect of Ro 25–6981 [F (1, 32) = 0.05986, p = 0.8083]; effect of ZnD [F (1, 32) = 0.0851, p = 0.7724]; (I) p-ERK/ERK: interaction [F (1, 32) = 0.2892, p = 0.5944]; effect of Ro 25–6981 [F (1, 32) = 0.5073, p = 0.4815]; effect of ZnD [F (1, 32) = 0.8807, p = 0.3550]; (J) Synapsin I: interaction [F (1, 32) = 2.334, p = 0.1364]; effect of Ro 25–6981: [F (1, 32) = 0.899, p = 0.3502], effect of ZnD [F (1, 32) = 0.2022, p = 0.6560]; (K) GluA1: Interaction [F (1, 32) = 0.003627, p = 0.9523]; effect of Ro 25–6981 [F (1, 32) = 0.09773, p = 0.7566], effect of ZnD [F (1, 32) = 0.02311, p = 0.8801].
Figure 4The effect of a single dose of Ro 25-6981 on density of dendritic spines in the Cg3 cortex (A) and IL cortex (B). Ro 25-6981 (10 mg/kg; i.p.) was administered 180 min before the decapitation, n = 5–6. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and the Newman–Keuls multiple comparisons test. Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M.; (A) two way ANOVA for Cg3 showed non-significant interaction [F (1, 17) = 0.2588, p = 0.6175], the significant effect of ZnD [F (1, 17) = 11.29, p = 0.0037], and the significant effect of Ro 25–6981 [F (1, 17) = 6.498, p = 0.0207]; (B) Two way ANOVA for IL showed non-significant interaction [F (1, 16) = 1.178, p = 0.2938, the significant effect of ZnD [F (1, 16) = 13.07, p = 0.0023] and the significant effect of Ro 25–6981 [F (1, 16) = 4.692, p = 0.0457]. *p < 0.05 vs. ZnA + Veh.