Literature DB >> 33762904

Word Detection in Individual Subjects Is Difficult to Probe With Fast Periodic Visual Stimulation.

Lydia Barnes1, Selene Petit1, Nicholas A Badcock2,3,4, Christopher J Whyte1, Alexandra Woolgar1,2.   

Abstract

Measuring cognition in single subjects presents unique challenges. On the other hand, individually sensitive measurements offer extraordinary opportunities, from informing theoretical models to enabling truly individualised clinical assessment. Here, we test the robustness of fast, periodic, and visual stimulation (FPVS), an emerging method proposed to elicit detectable responses to written words in the electroencephalogram (EEG) of individual subjects. The method is non-invasive, passive, and requires only a few minutes of testing, making it a potentially powerful tool to test comprehension in those who do not speak or who struggle with long testing procedures. In an initial study, Lochy et al. (2015) used FPVS to detect word processing in eight out of 10 fluent French readers. Here, we attempted to replicate their study in a new sample of 10 fluent English readers. Participants viewed rapid streams of pseudo-words with words embedded at regular intervals, while we recorded their EEG. Based on Lochy et al. (2015) we expected that words would elicit a steady-state response at the word-presentation frequency (2 Hz) over parieto-occipital electrode sites. However, across 40 datasets (10 participants, two conditions, and two regions of interest-ROIs), only four datasets met the criteria for a unique response to words. This corresponds to a 10% detection rate. We conclude that FPVS should be developed further before it can serve as an individually-sensitive measure of written word processing.
Copyright © 2021 Barnes, Petit, Badcock, Whyte and Woolgar.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; fast periodic visual stimulation; language; reading; steady state evoked response; word detection

Year:  2021        PMID: 33762904      PMCID: PMC7982886          DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.602798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Neurosci        ISSN: 1662-453X            Impact factor:   4.677


  32 in total

1.  ERP manifestations of processing printed words at different psycholinguistic levels: time course and scalp distribution.

Authors:  S Bentin; Y Mouchetant-Rostaing; M H Giard; J F Echallier; J Pernier
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex.

Authors:  Bruno Rossion; Carrie A Joyce; Garrison W Cottrell; Michael J Tarr
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Eva Rosa; Consolación Gómez
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-02

Review 4.  Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping.

Authors:  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; W Kyle Simmons; Patrick S F Bellgowan; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink.

Authors:  S J Luck; E K Vogel; K L Shapiro
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-10-17       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Left cortical specialization for visual letter strings predicts rudimentary knowledge of letter-sound association in preschoolers.

Authors:  Aliette Lochy; Marie Van Reybroeck; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The time course of the lowercase advantage in visual word recognition: An ERP investigation.

Authors:  Marta Vergara-Martínez; Manuel Perea; Barbara Leone-Fernandez
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  How interindividual differences in brain anatomy shape reading accuracy.

Authors:  Arnaud Cachia; Margot Roell; Jean-François Mangin; Zhong Yi Sun; Antoinette Jobert; Lucia Braga; Olivier Houde; Stanislas Dehaene; Grégoire Borst
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.270

9.  Word recognition in the human inferior temporal lobe.

Authors:  A C Nobre; T Allison; G McCarthy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-11-17       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Unconstrained multivariate EEG decoding can help detect lexical-semantic processing in individual children.

Authors:  Selene Petit; Nicholas A Badcock; Tijl Grootswagers; Alexandra Woolgar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Distinct neural sources underlying visual word form processing as revealed by steady state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP).

Authors:  Fang Wang; Blair Kaneshiro; C Benjamin Strauber; Lindsey Hasak; Quynh Trang H Nguyen; Alexandra Yakovleva; Vladimir Y Vildavski; Anthony M Norcia; Bruce D McCandliss
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.