| Literature DB >> 32639677 |
Jedrzej Hoffmann1,2, Silvia Mas-Peiro1,2, Alexander Berkowitsch1, Felicitas Boeckling1,2, Tina Rasper3, Konrad Pieszko4,5, Roberta De Rosa1, Jarosław Hiczkiewicz4,5, Paweł Burchardt6, Stephan Fichtlscherer1,2, Andreas M Zeiher1,2,7, Stefanie Dimmeler2,3,7, Mariuca Vasa Nicotera1,2,7.
Abstract
AIMS: Systemic inflammatory response, identified by increased total leucocyte counts, was shown to be a strong predictor of mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Yet the mechanisms of inflammation-associated poor outcome after TAVI are unclear. Therefore, the present study aimed at investigating individual inflammatory signatures and functional heterogeneity of circulating myeloid and T-lymphocyte subsets and their impact on 1 year survival in a single-centre cohort of patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Aortic stenosis; Inflammation; Monocytes; T cells; TAVI
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32639677 PMCID: PMC7524092 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.12837
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ESC Heart Fail ISSN: 2055-5822
Baseline clinical characteristics and comparison of the 12 month survival groups
| Total cohort ( | Survivors ( | Non‐survivors ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 83 [IQR 79–86] | 83 [IQR 79–86] | 82.5 [IQR 78–85] | 0.93 |
| Male gender, | 76 (58.9) | 61 (59.2) | 15 (57.7) | 1.0 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 27.0 [IQR 24.4–30.3] | 27.4 [IQR 24.8–31.1] | 26.7 [IQR 23.3–29.3] | 0.24 |
| Frailty, | 81 (62.8) | 60 (58.3) | 21 (80.8) | 0.04 |
| Advanced CKD (eGFR < 60), | 79 (61.2) | 59 (57.3) | 20 (76.9) | 0.11 |
| Carotid artery disease, | 27 (20.9) | 18 (17.5) | 9 (34.6) | 0.06 |
| Peripheral artery disease, | 18 (14) | 14 (13.6) | 4 (15.4) | 0.76 |
| Previous cardiac surgery | 18 (14) | 13 (12.6) | 5 (19.2) | 0.36 |
| Coronary artery disease (CAD) | ||||
| One‐vessel CAD, | 35 (27.1) | 30 (29.1) | 5 (19.2) | 0.037 |
| Two‐vessel CAD, | 16 (12.4) | 15 (14.6) | 1 (3.9) | |
| Three‐vessel CAD, | 29 (22.5) | 18 (17.5) | 11 (42.3) | |
| Previous MI, | 15 (11.6) | 10 (9.7) | 5 (19.2) | 0.18 |
| Previous PCI, | 58 (45) | 43 (41.8) | 15 (57.7) | 0.19 |
| Previous stroke, | 19 (14.7) | 16 (15.5) | 3 (11.5) | 0.76 |
| Porcelain aorta, | 18 (14) | 13 (12.6) | 5 (19.2) | 0.36 |
| COPD, | 18 (14) | 12 (11.7) | 6 (23.1) | 0.20 |
| Diabetes, | 48 (37.2) | 33 (32.0) | 15 (57.7) | 0.023 |
| Hypertension, | 121 (93.8) | 97 (94.2) | 24 (92.3) | 0.66 |
| Left ventricular EF (%) | 60 [IQR 45–60] | 60 [IQR 55–65] | 47.5 [IQR 35–60] | 0.007 |
| EuroSCORE II | 3.31 [IQR 2.31–6.04] | 3.13 [IQR 2.25–5.99] | 4.81 [IQR 3.30–13.58] | 0.001 |
| STS score | 3.41 [IQR 2.45–4.94] | 3.40 [IQR 2.32–4.50] | 4.88 [IQR 3.14–6.04] | <0.001 |
CAD, coronary artery disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.73 m2); MI, myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.
Figure 1Intraindividual time courses in circulating leucocyte subset counts. (A–C) Major leucocyte subsets of (A) neutrophils, (B) eosinophils, and (C) lymphocytes. (D–F) Kinetics of T‐cell counts including (D) total T cells, (E) CD4+ T cells, and (F) CD8+ T cells. Subset counts are shown as percentage change (median) during the prespecified time points after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), with the baseline value (pre‐TAVI) set to 0% (Friedman test, with Dunn's multiple‐comparisons test).
Figure 2Intraindividual time courses in circulating monocyte subset counts. (A) Representative flow cytometry plots showing changes in monocyte subset distribution after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). (B) Kinetics of monocyte counts including total monocytes, classical, intermediate, and non‐classical monocytes. Subset counts are shown as percentage change (median) during the prespecified time points after TAVI, with the baseline value (pre‐TAVI) set to 0% (Friedman test, with Dunn's multiple‐comparisons test).
Figure 3Intraindividual time courses in circulating CD4+ T‐cell subset counts. (A) CD4+ effector T‐cell subset flow gating strategy and immunophenotyped legend (box). (B) Kinetics of CD4+ effector T‐cell counts including Th1, Th2, Th9, TH17, Th17/Th1, and Th22 cells. (C) Gating strategy and representative flow plots showing changes in CD4+ T regulatory cells after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). (D) Kinetics of Treg counts following TAVI. Subset counts are shown as percentage change (median) during the prespecified time points after TAVI, with the baseline value (pre‐TAVI) set to 0% (Friedman test, with Dunn's multiple‐comparisons test).
Intra‐hospital complications and their association with 30 day mortality
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intra‐hospital complication |
| % | 30 day mortality | % |
|
| Pacemaker | 24 | 19 | 0 | 0 | |
| Stroke | 4 | 3 | 1 | 25 | 0.120 |
| Myocardial infarction | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Cardiac tamponade | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Major vascular complication | 9 | 7 | 2 | 22.2 | 0.024 |
| Major bleeding | 6 | 5 | 1 | 16.7 | 0.175 |
| Total 30 day mortality | 4 | 3.1 | |||
Inflammatory predictors of 12 month mortality (univariate analysis)
| Univariate HR (95% CI) |
| |
|---|---|---|
| hsCRP pre‐TAVI | 1.37 (1.151–1.631) | 0.000 |
| IL‐6 pre‐TAVI | 1.017 (1.006–1.028) | 0.003 |
| Non‐class monocytes (counts) post‐TAVI | 1.030 (1.010–1.050) | 0.003 |
| Th2 (counts) pre‐TAVI | 0.948 (0.912–0.987) | 0.009 |
| Treg (% CD4+ T cells) pre‐TAVI | 1.179 (1.025–1.357) | 0.021 |
| Gran/lymph ratio pre‐TAVI | 1.147 (1.019–1.292) | 0.023 |
| Th17 (% CD4+ T cells) pre‐TAVI | 1.189 (1.023–1.382) | 0.024 |
| Intermediate monocytes (count) pre‐TAVI | 1.028 (0.997–1.060) | 0.081 |
| Intermediate monocytes (count) post‐TAVI | 1.027 (0.995–1.059) | 0.094 |
| Classical monocytes (count) pre‐TAVI | 1.001 (0.998–1.004) | 0.514 |
| Classical monocytes (count) post‐TAVI | 1.002 (0.999–1.005) | 0.286 |
The hazard ratios of intermediate and classical monocytes shown for comparison of prognostic impact.
Univariate and multivariate analysis of dichotomized 12 month mortality predictors
| Univariate | Multivariate | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) |
| HR (95% CI) |
| |
| Diabetes | 2.463 (1.130–5.369) | 0.023 | 3.499 (1.420–8.623) | 0.006 |
| Low LVEF (<50%) | 3.406 (1.574–7.367) | 0.002 | 3.155 (1.347–7.393) | 0.008 |
| Anaemia (Hb < 11 g/dL) | 5.732 (2.405–13.661) | <0.001 | ||
| NT‐proBNP > 2430 pg/dL | 5.186 (2.176–12.359) | <0.001 | ||
| hsCRP > 0.52 mg/dL | 3.491 (1.554–7.841) | 0.002 | 5.217 (2.091–13.012) | <0.001 |
| IL‐6 > 8.95 pg/dL | 3.075 (1.412–6.696) | 0.005 | ||
| Th17 > 4.9 (% CD4+ T cells) | 3.237 (1.115–9.397) | 0.031 | ||
| Th2 < 24.3 cells/μL | 5.825 (2.159–15.716) | 0.001 | 8.828 (3.021–25.800) | <0.001 |
LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.
Figure 4Inflammatory predictors of 12 month mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). (A) Circos plots showing significant predictors of 12 month mortality (univariate analysis of dichotomized parameters). (B) The composite (linear predictor score) of diabetes, low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), increased C‐reactive protein (calculated optimal cut‐off 0.052 mg/dL), and decreased circulating Th2 cells (calculated cut‐off: 24.3 cells/μL) provided significantly higher area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) when compared with traditional Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score. (C) Survival rate in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and preserved Th2 cell counts (higher than or equal to the calculated optimal cut‐off of 24.3 cells/μL) was comparable with that of patients without DM, whereas diabetic patients with reduced Th2 cells (<24.3 cells/μL) showed significantly higher mortality within 12 months after TAVI. (D) Serum levels of high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein (hsCRP) did not show any significant impact on the prognosis of patients with DM.
Figure 5Pro‐inflammatory T‐cell polarization predicts adverse (LV) remodelling after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Low numbers of T regulatory cells (Tregs) (A) and increased TH17/Treg ratio (B) were associated with adverse (Group 4) remodelling. The Kruskal–Wallis H test was used for multi‐group analysis (framed P‐values shown in the upper left‐hand corner of the graph) and post‐hoc Mann–Whitney U test for two‐group comparison was also performed.